You just said it made no sense for her to have tits so WHY MAKE HER HAVE TITS?! *headdesk!* I'm waiting for the next computer generated movie in which the birds, fish, even the tress have boobs. Because, you know, (posted to Asshat Interview of the Day, with Director James Cameron)
I saw the same sort of shit when I worked at Gamestop. Working there as a woman was definitely trying. The only thing that made me LOVE working there was the truly awesome people at my store. If it wasn't (posted to I can see how you are seeing me)
That is absolutely terrible that that happened. I would say I hope she got seriously reprimanded for pulling that kinda bullshit, but (I assume, and correct me if I'm wrong) in the US people LOVE to come up with stupid (posted to The messed-up case for religious discrimination)
I guess the biggest difference between those two things is that PETA actively works to end animal research and things like that while hospitals don't actively work to do anti-christian things. Yeah? Some jobs, yeah sure, like abortion clinics or (posted to The messed-up case for religious discrimination)
I think there is literally some evil doer (an 80s style evil doer dressed in mostly purple and being HORRIBLY OBVIOUS about his evil doing) sitting up somewhere working to reduce the population of women. There is no freakin' way (posted to *sigh* First mammograms, now this)
I agree that this kind of behavior ABSOLUTELY should not be tolerated, but I think freedom of expression is too important to discriminate based on beliefs/affiliation. Not only would it absolutely NOT hold water in court, but I just don't (posted to The messed-up case for religious discrimination)
My thought is actually that this is great-I've never had an abnormal pap, have no family history of cervical cancer and am young enough that abnormalities generally clear themselves up. why then should I have to get a pap every (posted to *sigh* First mammograms, now this)
This was even more important than changing the mammogram recommendations, as the treatment for suspected cervical cancer is quite hazardous to long-term function. What's more, they don't even mention anxiety here; it's all about potential damage to the uterus or (posted to *sigh* First mammograms, now this)
i think it makes a lot of sense... as long as we keep educating girls and boys about safe sex, and vaccinate both girls and boys against the HPV. the first step to reducing cervical cancer is practicing safe sex (posted to *sigh* First mammograms, now this)
I'm not big on conspiracy theories...but any one find it funny that now that it looks like we might have a government funded national healthcare plan all these "preventative" procedures are getting advice to cut back? HUH? In all seriousness (posted to *sigh* First mammograms, now this)
