I don't see anything wrong with the screening as long as it's billed as XXX and is used as a tool to open up discourse on gender issues and the pornography industry itself. I think that aim might be more (posted to Porn? In my University?)
I think censorship is much, much more dangerous than porn and cigarettes. Why anyone would want to watch porn in public, though, is beyond me. (posted to Porn? In my University?)
i saw my first porn as a freshman in college. it was a 3-D john hughs film from the 70s that was being shown at a special midnight screening. i went with a female friend and we squirmed and giggled (posted to Porn? In my University?)
I think the senator was going too far to cut funding. It was being shown for free. Why in a student union, I don't understand. I could see it being used for human sexuality, gender studies, or philosophy courses. I (posted to Porn? In my University?)
I live in Baltimore, so I've been somewhat following this story. While it can certainly "open discussion" on gender roles and sexuality, I certainly don't think that was the original intent of those who planned to show it. I think (posted to Porn? In my University?)
I do think that an open screening is a little bit sketchy but it serves its purpose. They are being straight up about what it is. The government has not right to do anything about it. (Actually I don't think (posted to Porn? In my University?)
