http://web.blogads.com/advertise/liberal_blog_advertising_network
Liberal Prose BlogAds Network
Sometimes, you don't have to read the article...

To know it's gonna make you angry. Sigh.

h/t The Frisky

Posted by Jessica - November 09, 2009, at 01:15PM | in Feminism , Media , Sexism

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Sometimes, you don't have to read the article....

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.feministing.com/cgi-bin/movabletype/mt-tb.fcgi/17050

51 Comments

[0+] Author Profile Page kahri said:

Personally, neither, I prefer "femi-nazi"

sigh.

[0+] Author Profile Page SociologicalMe replied to kahri :

Um, I'm ok with being a "not the fun kind" feminist and embracing that, but I don't really see a way to reclaim the term "nazi" without it being seriously problematic.

[0+] Author Profile Page littlefox replied to SociologicalMe :

I think the commenter was making a joke ...

What was up with the "India personified as a country" thing? There is a country called India ... ? Confusing. Also, has this writer read anything about India, or does she just have a vague idea based on white people's henna and Hinduism fetishes?

[0+] Author Profile Page heatherlchase said:

Later in the article she states:

"Whenever I do take the time to tap into "feminine-ism"—this energy of simply being by indulging in a meditative and self-nurturing manicure, a facial or a hot bubble bath—that's when I feel my most powerful." hahahahaha

I guess I'm a big burly feminist then.

Feminine-ist? That's not even a good word! Somehow I'm not too worried about this one catching on...

Seriously. When I try to pronounce it, I stumble. It's awkward. Hm. It's kind of like high heels, that way.

Feminist, on the other hand, just rolls off the tongue...

[0+] Author Profile Page Ellen Marie-Frances said:

slow side to side headshake. crazy fucker.

[0+] Author Profile Page aloz said:

Oh....is it not a known fact that all feminists are ugly? ..UGH.

I pray to Jesus this does not catch on, this is completely absurd.

[0+] Author Profile Page Sloppy Sandwich replied to aloz :

I am a feminist.

I am tall, hairy, and unfeminine.

This might be because I'm a man.

[0+] Author Profile Page JesiDangerously replied to Sloppy Sandwich :

Masculine-ist!

Feminine-iem: Low calorie feminism that keeps you regular. Finally!

[0+] Author Profile Page clareNY said:

Articles like this make me angry because they are couched in a purported "feminism," or something that at first glance sounds like it. The prose of the author sounds like she's just trying to offering a subtle helping hand, to make all women feel their best. But really, she is just reinforcing stereotypes, both about women in general and about feminists, in a way that doesn't actually benefit anyone. It would have been less harmful to just have an article that says, "You probably work too hard. Have a manicure or take a walk; you might feel better" than to try to frame in it a way that claims to be an enlightened view on the roles of women in the world.

This is an article on the Oprah website, the website of one of the most powerful women in the world in many ways. And that pains me because it will probably reach a lot of people, and there's just so much wrong with it, so much that alienates so many different kinds of women. The fact that she takes the definitions of masculine and feminine as givens, presumes that her definition of femininity is the right and only one (and for the record that's what I think she's doing) alienates and insults anyone who defines it differently, or anyone who identifies as a woman, but not as feminine.

I want to articulate this better, but I'm at work and need to go back to doing that. For the record, in response to the title of the article "Are you a Feminist or a Feminine-ist?" I created an account on Oprah.com, logged in, and commented "I'm a feminist." It made me feel a little better.

[0+] Author Profile Page wisiti replied to clareNY :

This.

I think you've articulated it very well. That's exactly what I was thinking. And I noticed your comment. Good work! :)

[0+] Author Profile Page Jrant replied to clareNY :

leaving the comment was a great idea, and I totally copied it. well done.

[0+] Author Profile Page clareNY replied to Jrant :

Oh, I just went back and saw a bunch of people did! I don't know if it's because I did or just because they had the same idea at the same time, but I just squealed at my cubicle!

I hate it when people don't know what a feminist looks like to take a catchy slogan off of a button.

Since when does feminist exclude the house-wife, the knitter, the crocheter, the doll-collector, the baker, and the woman in touch with her body? The only thing feminism means is that I want to be equal to my male coworkers and friends! I don't wanna be treated second-class for who I am.

Yes, perhaps we're vocal and that gets misconstrued as 'bitchy', but that doesn't mean we aren't also in touch with our feminine sides..... I can take care of my body and be girly and still be a feminist who wants to succeed in a male-dominated career!

[0+] Author Profile Page JesiDangerously said:

She's right, though. I am overworked. And it's because I'm a feminist, yup. Not because I have to make money. If I weren't a feminist, I could just laze around by the pool all day and hope some man will pay my bills.

[0+] Author Profile Page Tabitha said:

That article is just..., well..., dumb!

Sorry I can't come up with something more analytic, but I felt compelled to write some sort of response since I wasted the time reading the article.

BTW, I know plenty of non-feminists who are irritable, strident, etc. Why are these words still associated with feminists? And why are they over-associated with women? I meet plenty of men who fit this description!

[0+] Author Profile Page zes replied to Tabitha :

Didn't you know that when a man is irritated by something and then goes on and on about it that he is merely being forthright and eloquent?

[0+] Author Profile Page zes replied to Tabitha :

Anyone notice that the comments on that article are unanimously pointing out what's wrong with it? Well done the sisterhood for making clear which way the wind is blowing.

I got halfway down page 2. I used to read Cosmopolitan before I gave it up for the Economist, and even they never (well, rarely) stooped as low as that tripe.

[0+] Author Profile Page Jos said:

I especially liked this part: "it might have been a transvestite." Wait, liked is the wrong word... was disgusted by? Wished I couldn't believe I was reading it in an article on Oprah's website? Couldn't make it past the first page of the article? Yeah, that's more accurate.

[0+] Author Profile Page conductress replied to Jos :

Yeah, I stopped reading after that part too. :(

[0+] Author Profile Page clareNY replied to Jos :

Yeah, I was appalled by that part too. I don't even really understand what her point was with that anecdote. It didn't even make sense, in addition to being very offensive.

[0+] Author Profile Page JesiDangerously said:

Oh, and this is my favorite part:

"With the word "feminism," it might have been embarrassing for a man to say he was a supporter because it might sound like he was admitting to supporting of a group of controlling, bitchy women. But with new pro-sexiness, pro-sweetness, pro-balance words like "feminine-ist" and "feminine-ism," what's not for a man to love?"

Because, what good are women's rights if men are not pandered to?

[0+] Author Profile Page cutekotori replied to JesiDangerously :

UGH!

THAT and "dont have to lose your feminine side to be a feminist"

WHO said that one had to?? It just doesnt make any sense. It seems like she has NO IDEA what it is to be a feminist, and is instead bolstering the stereotype that being a feminist is about man-hating and feminine-hating???

Its like shes trying to soften feminism so that the menz wont be intimidated. Because you know ladies are soft and feminists are pressuring modern women to be tough and harsh. ughh NO feminists are pressuring women to be themselves outside of what our society expects women to be like. We want women to be happy, know all their options and not feel like they have to conform to one thing or what society is pressuring women to be like. If she feels like feminisim is the reason why shes "doing doing doing" and stressed and her schedule is so overbooked, then shes an freaking idiot.

A poor attempt at pointing out the problems with an aggressive, overly "masculine" culture, followed by trying to convince women they still need to look "pretty".

Not worth my anger.

All I want to know is how she defines "sexy" since she usues it practically every other freakin' word. Is this to mean the stereotypical media driven image of a "sexy" woman, looking good for men, cis gendered, thin, white, typically blonde? Because if it is then she can just kiss my ass. I hate the femiinie-ist (ugh, I hate that non-word) backlash of "it's okay to be sexy!" when generally they pretty much mean the general media portrayal of sexy. Which turns me right off because I do not fall under that stereotype at all. Why does being a woman ALWAYS have to be one specific thing? you don't have to be sexy AND powerful to be a feminist. You don't have to be ugly and powerful or sexy and not powerful. Every woman is her own thing and it just bugs the crap out of me when ANYONE (feminine-ists and feminists alike) tries to define being a "real" woman. Why can't you have an article that talks about powerful feminine women without having to write off and bash feminism? Is it that hard?

This article can bite me. And sorry if there are any misspellings. I went over it to check but my eyes are still blurry from my Lasik so I'm not too sure if I caught everything. But blurry vision or no this article just pissed me off way too much to not say something.

What kind of idiot sees the unjust, negative connotations associated with a word and decides to just change the word instead of working towards changing those negative connotations? Just sweep it under the rug and pretend it doesn't exist? Brilliant.

[0+] Author Profile Page SociologicalMe said:

Gotta love the messages that the accompanying picture sends about what a feminine-ist is like.

Cutesy/childish bob haircut? check
Too-high table making a woman look like a girl? check
Licensed withdrawal (failure to make eye contact with the camera) showing subordinance to the viewer? check
feminine touch (touching her own face, often associated with subordinance and seuxality)? check

[0+] Author Profile Page Sloppy Sandwich replied to SociologicalMe :

Yeah I thought that picture was so cheesy. I envision a thought bubble by her head reading "I'd kind of like to be a feminist, but jeepers I sure don't want people to think I'm tough, overworked or unattractive!"

[0+] Author Profile Page Emily H. said:

"The irony? Whenever I do take the time to tap into 'feminine-ism'—this energy of simply being by indulging in a meditative and self-nurturing manicure, a facial or a hot bubble bath—that's when I feel my most powerful." Facials and baths? It really IS ironic if you feel your "most powerful" while lying motionless and doing nothing. Check this out, I feel MY most powerful when I tap into the energy of simply being, by sleeping! Top THAT!

"Another good thing about bandying about words like 'feminine-ist' and 'feminine-ism'? Men can join in the bandying!" I guarantee you men are not going to start bandying those words about. No, no they're not.

[0+] Author Profile Page SociologicalMe said:

Anyone else get the impression that feminine-ists are an exclusively white, upper-middle class bunch? I could add some more dimensions of privilege, too...

We did read (and comment on, of course) the entire thing over the weekend, and it just gets better as it goes - from the repeated insistence that feminists are ugly bitches, to the self-nurturing manicure as source of power, to the personified masculine and feminine countries, to the excitement over how feminine-ism is better because men will like it more.

[0+] Author Profile Page daytrippinariel said:

"As a card-carrying "feminine-ist," I am here to tell you that feeling sexy is what helps me to be my most powerful and successful self, and being powerful and successful also helps me feel damn sexy!"

Why is the ultimate goal to always feel sexy? I feel like this is the problem in the first place. Once again, my worth is my ability to be look, feel, and act sexy. My worth isn't my intellect, humor, talent, or loving relationships. But if I'm constantly feeling pressured to feel sexy and you make me insecure then I'll buy your products or your sponsors products to learn how I can be sexy. Then I'll be enlightened and happy.

exactly. this author does NOTHING to question why her attractiveness is so important and vital to her well-being?... she is the dumbest lady ever. please take away her journalism license. i thought being a journalist meant having to do at least SOME research before writing an article? she clearly has never read a single piece on feminism,

[0+] Author Profile Page MsChevious replied to daytrippinariel :

That is what bothers me most about this "feminine-ism" crap, that it's all about *choosing* to feel as though you are empowered by a subjective judgement made of how you look & behave by heterosexual, cis-gendered men.

When did that become emancipation?! Personally I always thought I was fighting for equality and the right to be judged on a level playing field but nooooooooooooooooooooo, it was so I could fool myself that dressing like a Pussycat Doll and being cutesy-sweet so the boys don't think I'm a ball-buster is actual equality. Silly me.

How tedious.

[0+] Author Profile Page Disarm33 said:

The reason I was drawn to feminism is because it says that traditional views of what is feminine and what is masculine aren't the only ways to express your gender. People do not fit in categories so easily. As female individual who has never been "feminine" I am irritated that Salmansohn thinks that I am not living up to my full potential. In fact I think a lot of people do not live up to their full potential because they are afraid some aspects of themselves would not be "manly" or "girly." It also irritates me that because I am not "feminine" there is this assumption that I frown upon anything that is. No, I just don't think traditional femininity is for me. I never felt comfortable in those roles. If you do, more power to you. But my anatomy does not dictate my personality, aspirations,etc.

I really also don't like the divisiveness in this. She pretty much saying "we aren't like THOSE mean, ugly, bitchy feminists over there." Nice. Isn't feminism about the rights of every human, not just the pretty feminine ones? I take pride in my tough persona and my non traditional attractiveness. And I don't think I'm a bitch because I stand up to someone who wrongs me. People aren't always nice to me, so why should I be all smiles and ribbons for them?

Seriously, bubble baths and facials are when I should feel at the top of my game? No, thanks.

I feel less intelligent for having read that.

Seriously, if people have issues with feminism, the logical answer is not to change the name, but to challenge existing notions of what feminism is and isn't.

I do not feel the need to get manicures to make myself more palatable to society.

Me too! 5 minutes of my life I'll never get back into my femininie-ness what not.
I'm clipping my nails off one by one, snyeah to you Oprah.

[0+] Author Profile Page Toongrrl said:

This turns my stomach. Since I'm such a masochist I will open that link. I will keep ya'll updated

[0+] Author Profile Page Toongrrl said:

Tear my eyes out!!!

[0+] Author Profile Page vrandom said:

Now that I'm a registered Oprah.com user, feel free to post more articles like this so I can comment on them in a timely manner.
Thanks!

Also, the posts so far have pretty much covered it, but geez Louise, really? Someone was paid to write this crap?

[0+] Author Profile Page jeana said:

Oh my gosh Karen Salmansohn of Oprah! Thank you so much for writing this article! I thought I had to choose between being feminine and attractive and being a feminist. Now all I have to do is to call myself a "feminine-ist". Of course, I'll sound like a bubblehead to anyone listening (try saying it out loud--it sounds like you're drunk).

[0+] Author Profile Page rustyspoons said:

I'll admit I only made it through half of this drivel. I lost it when she started stereotyping--uh--ooops, that's "personifying", yeah that's it---nationalities. But I have to wonder why she's so obsessed with the idea that one can't be strong and feminism. I mean, why can't you like, say--martial arts and also like flowery smelling bubble baths or whatever? It seems these anti-feminists are the ones who get stuck in this "either-or" mindset that must make their world narrower and blander. How sad.

[0+] Author Profile Page Mona said:

Very very absurd. The only validity that I can see in it, if there's one at all, is one that I can only present with an example:
A friend of mine calls herself a feminist and she prides herself in having short hair, dressing blandly in drab-colored pants and shirts (ok, so she's a communist?? ha ha), not wearing any make-up, and not carrying around a purse. Her personal choices are hers of course, fine. And it's great that she's proud of them and non self-conscious of them. But she is always "pushing" short hair and no makeup on others. And for me it's kind of like, if I like my hair long and like to pretty myself up, and like to carry a purse, that's not okay? I mean there are certainly more important gender inequity issues than hair length and makeup! It's not like i'm doing something unhealthy like breast implants. These things are just superficial individual differences and such differences make for a more beautiful world. Isn't it more important that we do what makes us feel good about ourselves? And sometimes that might mean highlighting our best physical features.

Just my 2 cents....

i HATEEEEEEEEE when people who have no idea what feminism is (ie most likely have NEVER read any serious books on the matter) claim to be experts on feminism. dont write an authoritative piece on something u have no idea about. UGH!

[0+] Author Profile Page Quinc said:

Clearly she's still stuck thinking of feminine and masculine as two fundamental opposites. I've found this to be the basis of all patriarchal thinking. It's interesting that she's talking about people having both masculine and feminine sides, but ultimately making them into yin-yang is probably a barrier to achieving that 'balance'.

I like the idea of being feminine and yet also strong, successful, powerful. But the reason you can do this is because strength, success, and power don't have to be 'masculine' things, so there isn't any conflict at all if you abandon gendered thinking.

The part about feeling powerful from getting beauty treatments is the worst. It's just buying into the old idea that attractiveness is a woman's only source of power. People who do this and feel good about it don't feel so great because of achieving some feminine-masculine balance but:
1. Because they make it as relaxing as possible, because you're paying a ton of cash
2. Because for a brief little while you actually measure up to patriarchy's ideal women, up until the point that a cloud of dust/life/reality blows up and gets in your hair.

[0+] Author Profile Page Erika said:

I own a really obscene amount of nail polish (to give myself "self-nurturing manicures," of course!) and I'm definitely not tough or strident. I wish someone had told me that I'm not a REAL feminist before I went and devoted so much time and energy to ending sexist oppression.

I really expected more from Oprah. Boo.

[0+] Author Profile Page Serenity said:

'But with new pro-sexiness, pro-sweetness, pro-balance words like "feminine-ist" and "feminine-ism," what's not for a man to love?'

*blink*

Because it's all about the men, right?

I have no desire to be 'sexy' or 'sweet' and I'm doing fine in being 'successful,' for my definition of success, which I can only imagine is considerably different from that of the author of this piece. And yet I'd consider myself a feminine woman. I just don't confuse my intuitive, nurturing personality with 'looking attractive for the men!'

Femininity reclaimed is power.
Self-objectification isn't.

[0+] Author Profile Page beckeck06 said:

"As a card-carrying "feminine-ist," I am here to tell you that ***feeling sexy is what helps me to be my most powerful and successful self****, and being powerful and successful also helps me feel damn sexy!" (**** mine)


hahahahahahhaaha. hilariously depressing.

Leave a comment


Search Feministing
Related Posts
Related Community Posts
Upcoming Events
  • Rally to Stop Stupak!
    Wednesday, 18 November 2009 03:30 PM to 05:30 PM
    Harvard Square T-Stop
    Cambridge, MA
  • Choices: Adoption
    Wednesday, 18 November 2009 07:00 PM to 09:00 PM
    NARAL Pro-Choice New York
    New York, NY
  • PROGRESSIVE SINGLE MINGLE a cocktail party for the left-leaning
    Thursday, 19 November 2009 07:00 PM to 10:00 PM
    People Lounge, in the heart of the Feminist District
    New York, NY
  • Transcending Boundaries Conference
    Friday, 20 November 2009 09:00 AM to 05:00 AM
    DCU Center
    Worcester, MA
  • SEX. CONSENT. POWER. PLEASURE. Film Screening & Panel Discussion
    Tuesday, 1 December 2009 07:00 PM to 10:00 PM
    Gallery Bar
    New York, NY

Recent Comments
Feministing As You Like It
Get involved with Feministing by joining our networks on:
Subscribe to Feministing