http://web.blogads.com/advertise/liberal_blog_advertising_network
Liberal Prose BlogAds Network
Quote of the Day

Via Wonkroom's Twitterfeed, a quote from the health care reform hearings and mark-up:

[US Senator John] Kyl: "I don't need maternity care" in my benefits package. [US Senator Debbie] Stabenow fires back: "I think your mom probably did."

For serious.

Video after the jump.

Posted by Miriam - September 25, 2009, at 12:57PM | in Health care

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Quote of the Day.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.feministing.com/cgi-bin/movabletype/mt-tb.fcgi/16201

28 Comments

[0+] Author Profile Page Lily A said:

Horay! That's why we Michiganders keep her around... :)

[0+] Author Profile Page Ellen Marie-Frances replied to Lily A :

w00t represent! I knew I was staying in Michigan for a reason.(If only because I'm going to college affordably in-state)

hiiiii

And why I wish I stayed in Michigan... except for that whole needing-a-job thing...

I feel like her and Carl Levin are among the best pairs that any state has sent to the Senate ...

Plus, Michigan's Rep. John Dingell in Congress kicks ass too--he's the guy who has submitted a bill for health care reform every year since he entered the House more than FIVE decades ago.

Not bad for the automobile state.

[0+] Author Profile Page Lily A replied to annaleighclark :

I dunno, Dingell is actually fairly conservative on a lot of issues. He's powerful in Congress because he's been there so long and is so moderate, and I'm glad he's so pro-union, but other than that... not a huge fan.

I was pretty upset when gerrymandering combined his district with Lynn Rivers. Now there was a fantastic woman with her heart (and her votes) in the right place!

hiiiiiiiiiiiii

[0+] Author Profile Page LivingOutLoud said:

That's fantastic Mr. Senator, that YOU personally don't need maternity care, but guess what, half the population of the country you were elected to work for and represent, at one point in their lives MIGHT need maternity care.

More to point, many women choose not to have children, choose to adopt, etc. etc. But those who DO CHOOSE to have children (as your right-wing party vehemently endorses (or is it forces?) women [in their rhetoric] to do).

You want to deny the much needed health care and pre-natal care to the women that you say should be having children, whether they like it or not? What the hell? It's so screwed up I can't even wrap my mind around it. I am done ranting...sorry.

[0+] Author Profile Page Teresa said:

This guy is "pro-life" but against maternity care included in health care. Shocker.

[0+] Author Profile Page bluebears said:

Gotta love conservatives....No abortion! for anyone! oh you want help having that baby we're forcing you to have? here's some help, I'll write it down in a little note, it says "fuck" and "you"

[0+] Author Profile Page pepper replied to bluebears :

Win!

[0+] Author Profile Page FlyBy replied to bluebears :

Made me laugh out loud. Thank you!

[0+] Author Profile Page sess said:

"Over 60 years ago my mom did..."

...and ladies have stopped giving birth since then, so shut up bitch.

::eye roll::

[0+] Author Profile Page pteraphyle said:

and I don't need the cholesterol or heart medication you need. So how bout we don't cover that either? It makes my insurance more expensive.

[0+] Author Profile Page aleks said:

Aren't any of you (or Sen Stabenow) familiar with John Kyl? His mother abandoned the nest long before he hatched.

[0+] Author Profile Page jellyleelips replied to aleks :

I'm sorry to hear that, but he's still a complete asshole. Stabenow could have said, "your sister" or "your grandmother" or "every mother in this country" and it would have had the same point: just because it doesn't affect you personally doesn't mean it doesn't affect millions of other people. And it's even more meaningful since other policies he supports would make it impossible for women to prevent or be rid of unwanted pregnancies.

Debbie Stabenow's a badass! And one of only 17 women in the Senate, incidentally. I feel like she's Michigan's gift to the nation... :)

[0+] Author Profile Page cattrack2 said:

The interesting point here is one of personal freedom. How do you force individuals to pay for health care they won't need? Say, maternity care for men & prostate cancer for women? In an individual mandate world this isn't necessarily a big issue (because you might assume that net-net it all equals out in the end)...But unless we have an individual mandate, ppl won't purchase health insurance until they absolutely need it, and that raises the costs for everyone else. We can't let ppl buy into health insurance once right after they decide to get pregnant, or just after they find out they have prostate cancer.

[0+] Author Profile Page aleks replied to cattrack2 :

Hence "preexisting condition" exclusions, and the need for mandating coverage if we mandate care for PEC's.

[0+] Author Profile Page Lily A replied to cattrack2 :

That's what insurance is. You're paying for other people's health care, and they pay for yours when you need it.

Should women only go into an insurance pool with other women, because only women need maternity care? Or maybe African Americans should have their own insurance pool so that white people don't have to pay for their higher rates of sickle cell anemia.

Obviously those two examples are absurd -- but the whole point of health insurance is that risk of various types of care are spread out. Men shouldn't pay less for their insurance because they don't need maternity care -- obviously men benefit from maternity care, just white folks benefit from African Americans getting the health care they need, just as any group benefits from any other group being healthy.

This is an issue with private insurance and public insurance alike...

[0+] Author Profile Page Shadowen replied to cattrack2 :

You make a fair point, but as well ask why people who don't have kids in public school have to pay property taxes the same amount as people who do.

And yes, there are people who argue, jokingly and non, that they shouldn't have to. But that's the social contract (in theory). Everyone pays in, and if god forbid you need something, everyone gets paid out.

[0+] Author Profile Page johnrabe said:

Awesome comeback :)

[0+] Author Profile Page PamelaVee said:

I love that it was a serious "yo mama" discussion!

XO

I won't ever need a prostate exam. But know what? I don't mind if everyone were to have a health plan that covers some things we don't need as long as it covers the things we DO need, and everyone gets it. Hell, hopefully you won't ever have to NEED most everything that's covered!

[0+] Author Profile Page katie said:

...and she totally broke Roberts Rules of Order to make that amazing comeback!! Ohhhhhh snap!

i didn't vote for jon kyl. i swear. please don't hold me accountable for that jackass.

***wanting to move to michigan right now, for more reasons than one***

Best "your mom" come back ever!

[0+] Author Profile Page FlyBy said:

More on this, from Donna Smith:
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/09/25-11

Donna Smith is a community organizer for the California Nurses Association and National Co-Chair for the Progressive Democrats of America Healthcare Not Warfare campaign.

[0+] Author Profile Page Burb said:

Proof that "Your Mom" CAN be a great comeback in many contexts.

Leave a comment


Search Feministing
Related Posts
Related Community Posts
Upcoming Events
  • Jessica Valenti discussion "The Purity Myth" hosted by Paradigm Shift
    Tuesday, 23 February 2010 07:00 PM to 10:00 PM
    The Tank
    New York, NY
  • Colgate University Vagina Monologues
    Thursday, 25 February 2010 08:00 PM to 10:00 PM
    Palace Theater
    Hamilton, NY
  • National Young Feminist Leadership Conference
    Saturday, 20 March 2010 09:00 AM to 07:00 PM
    University of the District of Columbia
    Washington, DC
  • National Young Feminist Leadership Conference
    Sunday, 21 March 2010 09:00 AM to 05:00 PM
    University of the District of Columbia
    Washington, DC
  • NYFLC: Congressional Day of Action
    Monday, 22 March 2010 10:00 AM to 04:00 PM
    Capitol Hill
    Washington, DC

Recent Comments
Feministing As You Like It
Get involved with Feministing by joining our networks on:
Subscribe to Feministing