Delta creates new line of uniforms (larger sizes not included)

The fashion world went hoo-ha for Delta Airlines when they decided to hire designer Richard Tyler to create new uniforms for the airline, who assured he'd made the dresses look "look sexy and great." (Ick.) The flight attendants at Delta, however, were less than thrilled to find that the uniform is too small:
The Northwest chapter of the Association of Flight Attendants-CWA (essentially made up of members from Northwest Airlines before it was bought by Delta) filed an official complaint with Delta Air Lines and requested that it make the signature red dress available in sizes going up to 28 (right now the red dress only goes up to a size 18). As Patricia Reller (who manages the union's grievances) told The Associated Press, the fact that the dress isn't available in larger sizes says: "We don't want you wearing that if you are over size 18."
Sadly, I can't say the nonsense that comes out of any airline surprises me anymore. You can contact Delta here.
Photo: Katy Winn, Getty Images.
0 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Delta creates new line of uniforms (larger sizes not included) .
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.feministing.com/cgi-bin/movabletype/mt-tb.fcgi/14943












Because the sexiness of the flight attendant affects whether or not I listen to him/her when I'm told to put up my tray........
I read this article the other day and was wondering when I'd see it on Feministing...
The whole thing puts me off to be honest.
When I read the first part about how Richard Tyler wanted to design a new uniform that is "sexy and great" I cringed. I thought we were getting away from the idea that flight attendants were supposed to be eye candy. And what about male flight attendants? Did he also design new uniforms for them? Or are women the only ones that need to feel "great" while doing their job?
Then the dress itself is only available if you're size 18 or smaller, well shit. Delta has said they offer other uniforms (I guess the older ones) to employees that are heavier than a size 18 but as Ms. Reller pointed out, the red dress is supposed to be eye catching and it's like saying if you're overweight they don't want to see you. They don't want you to stand out or feel great in a new uniform.
It's all just ugh.
yeah, it's pretty stupid that the uniforms had to be "sexy" in the first place. These flight attendants bloody work on PLANES, not in a strip club.
This, you hit the nail on the head. I understand being presentable, and even fashionable at your job, but seriously, no one is swinging on a pole here. It's not their job to be sexy and enticing. I would respect Delta a whole lot more if they didn't hide behind their reasoning with bullshit excuses.
So... what? Are they going to fire all of the plus sized flight attendants?
I kind of hope they try because then Delta will get hit with a big fat lawsuit and be forced to confront this BS.
No, the ones that are over size 18 are given the option of wearing different uniforms. My guess would be the older uniforms that they've been wearing.
Unfortunatly, by offering the other uniforms to flight attendants over size 18 there is a chance that they can use that as a way to get out of legal problems. I dont know if its definiate, im not a lawyer after all, but I have read about such things happening, people getting out of a lawsuit because of a technicality. I hope this isnt what is going to happen, and I hope Delta has to confront this.
The first thing I thought of looking at this artical was how intensly creepy that picture is. All I see is a much older man with his hands (way too low of anything) wrapped around two attractive young girls. Creepy! Did anyone else go to the picture first?
As for the entire artical, that is just horrible. Is this even legal? I am pretty sure there are laws that would cover something like this, but im sure the airline could find a way to get over the law which is saddening. What are the women who are over size 18 going to wear..? These poor women. Please give an update on the situation when it is available!
Yeah, that picture is very Hugh Hefnerish. A flight attendant's work is just as important as any other's, and they are there primarily to ensure the safety of the passengers. Giving them this kind of image is just completely uncalled for. It's condescending, and belittling.
Yeah, that picture is very Hugh Hefnerish. A flight attendant's work is just as important as any other's, and they are there primarily to ensure the safety of the passengers. Giving them this kind of image is just completely uncalled for. It's condescending, and belittling.
Yeah, that picture is very Hugh Hefnerish. A flight attendant's work is just as important as any other's, and they are there primarily to ensure the safety of the passengers. Giving them this kind of image is just completely uncalled for. It's condescending, and belittling.
I'm really sorry about the three posts guys. It kept telling me there was an error, so I just reposted.
Lol oh, I thought you did that because I wasnt answering! Yeah, when that error window comes up, dont refresh it. Reopen the page in another window, refresh that new page, and see if your comment is there. :)
Exactly, this just shows that even the Airline sees women flight attendents as sex objects, and not employees doing an important job. It makes me wonder how prevalent firing an employee over weight/hiring one over another because the first is skinnier is on this airline, and others for that matter.
Hey Hey Hey,
What is it with the ageist comments? What is wrong with an older man being with a younger attractive woman a la Hugh Hefner? What is wrong with an older woman being with a younger attractive man a la Demi Moore?
Anathema and Lynne C. seem to be pretty bigoted.
Please do not accuse me of such a horrendous thing. I am trying to be mature, but you do not know anything about me and NO I am NOT bigoted. I am so offended by that.
I dont think there is anything wrong with an older person dating a younger person. I have something wrong with a picture that puts young women as sexual objects when they are there to do a job, as the picture reminds me of playboy type shots. I can see how you might be mistaken, but do not accuse people before you know them. I hope that explination makes sense, and if not I will gladly reword it, but please do not make assumptions. That was false and cruel.
Hugh Hefner and Demi Moore are not even close to being equivalent. :| Hefner isn't in a relationship with a younger woman; he 'dates' women one quarter (or less) his age on a regular basis, sometimes up to a half dozen at a time, and keeps a whole house of them at the ready (easier to discard his current trophies once he's bored of them). Of course, none of the women he 'dates', or just keeps around the house, are allowed to see anyone else while he's running around with several at once. Most, if not all, of these women only feign interest because it benefits their careers, which is fine with him, since he's only interested in them for decorative value and because it helps him to maintain his image. It's closer to a harem than it is a relationship between equals. Demi Moore happened to date and marry a man who's roughly 15 years her junior, and AFAIK, they married because they actually *like* each other and the relationship is largely a respectful and loving one. Not the same, not the same at all. Something like Johnny Depp's marriage to Vanessa Paradis is a much better male counterpart to Demi Moore's marriage. I don't that a female counterpart for Hefner exists; I don't think it CAN exist in our society.
are they allowed to do that?!?!?!
once, I went on Kingfisher Airlines (in India) and I was appalled by how all of the female flight attendants had to wear stylish uniforms, red lipstick, heavy make-up, and wear stylish hair. It made me uncomfortable.
Are those red dressed the uniforms? If so, I'm surprised that the company isn't making them in larger sizes. Wrap dresses like that tend to be pretty flattering on plus-size women.
Also, what are the male flight attendants going to wear?
Yay! Feministing you rock! I was just about to post this on the community forum!! Our airline has a similar dress, but in navy. It is wayyy 'sexier' than our old one. This happened right about the time delta got their new uniforms.
I have actually had people(ah, yes, men) ask me "why do you wear pants? I didn't know 'stewardesses' were allowed to wear pants! HAHA! I've also had a few (non-airline in the terminal) think I was a pilot for this reason.
Unfortunately, while I agree for the most part, I have to say that FAs are STILL regarded as a sex symbol by some. From who I spoken with, it was worse as recent as 10 years ago.
Thanks Vannessa!!
Yay! Feministing you rock! I was just about to post this on the community forum!! Our airline has a similar dress, but in navy. It is wayyy 'sexier' than our old one. This happened right about the time delta got their new uniforms.
I have actually had people(ah, yes, men) ask me "why do you wear pants? I didn't know 'stewardesses' were allowed to wear pants! HAHA! I've also had a few (non-airline in the terminal) think I was a pilot for this reason.
Unfortunately, while I agree for the most part, I have to say that FAs are STILL regarded as a sex symbol by some. From who I spoken with, it was worse as recent as 10 years ago.
Thanks Vannessa!!
Oh sorry for leaving that twice.. :( I wanted to add that these uniforms aren't newly created, it's been quite a few years... the reason the issue has finally come up is because of the merger..
We could make this into something nefarious but I don't see any evidence of that yet. Our reaction seems to be knee jerk. Its important to read the article... There's nothing wrong with Size 18+ women looking "sexy and great". This is a far cry from the days when stewardesses wore mini skirts & hooker boots. The dresses, to me at least, don't look so "sexy" as they do "stylish". And it appears the male stewards uniforms got a do over as well.
And since this was announced 5 years ago without any apparent problems in the intervening years I imagine that in practice its not actually sexist. In fact from what the article suggests ALL the uniforms were re-made & the union's grievance is just about the red dress. I don't see a reason why it, too, shouldn't be offered in a size 18, but Delta is operating on the verge of bankruptcy so I imagine its just a money issue. (Also, btw, the NWA unions, which was the predecessor of the chapter complaining, wsa so notoriously aggressive they made the Teamsters look like hamsters).
Oh please, it's a money issue? Yeah right! You know what will cost them less money? Making the dresses in all sizes and avoiding a lawsuit and problems with the union.
And they are NOT called stewardesses anymore. It's flight attendants.
BTW nice throwing in the term "hooker boots." Seriously?
That's what we call 'em in my neck o' the woods. Tomato, toe-mah-toh. My only point is that the dress being derided as "sexist" is a pretty far cry from the old days: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TR7JApjgIGw. If you have a better term than "hooker boots" to convey the smoldering sexuality in this commercial, then have at it. But what's clear to me is that this ad is selling sex with stewardesses. It strains credulity that you actually think the red dress Delta designed is "sexist", so clearly this is a knee jerk reaction to the designer saying he wanted to create something "sexy".
Just like some people can be too quick to dismiss sexism, we can be too quick to call it. I'm just saying we shouldn't lose sight of the fact that we're hurling serious charges at real people.
Yes I do. How about: knee-high boots! Everyone knows exactly what you're talking about and you're not being offensive. It's like magic!
And it's not tomato, toe-mah-toh. They are flight attendants. It's gender neutral and it's not the same as calling someone a steward or stewardess which is basically like calling them your servant. Guess what, their main reason for being on the plane is for safety, not to look hot and fetch drinks.
Maybe stewardess/steward means "servant" to you, but it doesn't mean that to me. Of course I was raised to respect people no matter what job title they held, so, frankly, I don't put much stock in titles. And, btw, I've been a waiter, and there's nothing wrong with it. Its a good, honest living. Stop looking down your nose at the people who serve you your food & drink & there'd be no problem. The level of derision you have for people like us is offensive.
Hahahahahaha!
I've worked as a bartender and server (that's what we're called now btw, not waiter, again server is gender neutral) from the age of 16 until I was 24. I just stopped bartending a little over two years ago. Stop looking for stuff that isn't there and own up to your offensive posting.
THE TERM IS FLIGHT ATTENDANT.
And the term "hooker" is offensive as well. End of story.
I've worked as a waitress for years, and I still prefer being addressed as "waitress" (miss or madam is fine too, I still don't care for ma'am). "Server" is awfully close to servant. And I never want anyone but the nicest regulars calling me by my name. It's fucking creepy when strangers know your name.
I'm not offended by the term "hooker boots". One of the my proudest moments in high school was when a nasty little underclassmen informed me that "there's a hooker in Queens who wants her bitch books back".
Additionally, I don't agree that gender neutral is automatically better. If that's your preference fine, but why must we always deny our gender and several other aspects of our person at our jobs? Why can't we be professionals at the same time as being individuals?
I've worked as a waitress for years, and I still prefer being addressed as "waitress" (miss or madam is fine too, I still don't care for ma'am). "Server" is awfully close to servant. And I never want anyone but the nicest regulars calling me by my name. It's fucking creepy when strangers know your name.
I'm not offended by the term "hooker boots". One of the my proudest moments in high school was when a nasty little underclassmen informed me that "there's a hooker in Queens who wants her bitch books back".
Additionally, I don't agree that gender neutral is automatically better. If that's your preference fine, but why must we always deny our gender and several other aspects of our person at our jobs? Why can't we be professionals at the same time as being individuals?
Actually plus size dresses are more expensive:
"Cost is also a factor. Because they require more fabric, larger sizes are more expensive to manufacture. “The cost of clothing is disproportionately in the materials and not the labor, due to the shift in production to low-wage countries, which means that it is going to be more expensive to produce clothing for large-sized women, and more resources will be tied up in garments on the racks,” notes Susan Ashdown, a professor in the Department of Fiber Science & Apparel Design at Cornell and a leading researcher on improving apparel fit. Imagine the fury that would greet prices that went up with dress size."
http://www.doublex.com/section/life/real-reason-ann-taylor-hates-plus-sizes
a money issue? which is why they were able to hire a fancy designer to make the uniforms? and why they were even able to get new uniforms in the first place?
uh huh...
Well, most of the time issues with business boil down to money. If you check the article the uniforms were commissioned 5 years ago & released 3 years ago. And the union is just now filing its first grievance. Two things. 1) the economic climate for airlines has changed dramatically since 2004--a number have gone bankrupt since then & most are on the verge of bankruptcy, including Delta. 2) This particular union chapter is well known for fighting with management (right, wrong or indifferent), so this could just be another broadside in the labor-management fight.
I do happen to agree that the red dress should be made up to size 28, but there may be a number of reasons besides sexism that Delta hasn't done this yet.
Anti-fat bias comes to mind.
I don't see a lawsuit here. Those of us who are outside of what is considered normal weight in the US are not protected against discrimination in most states. Further many states are "employment at will" states which means an employee can be fired for any reason or none at all as long as the firing is not due to age, sex, race, or religion. Some progressive states protect sexual orientation--but not all. Does this suck? You bet, which is why fat activists exist.
Yes, I'm surprised at home many people I've seen commenting on this story on various blogs seem to assume that size/weight-based discrimination is illegal. It's not. It is -- disgustingly -- perfectly legal in almost every jurisdiction to refuse to hire someone (or to fire someone) solely based on that person's weight or size.
This makes me very sad.
It makes me very *mad*.
(Especially because it's no less true in my 'progressive' Canadian context.)
It's ridiculous that larger women can't wear that dress, because it's really beautiful. Seriously, if that wasn't a company-specific uniform, I'd wear that in a heartbeat.
While I agree that it's gross to specifically refer to wanting the flight attendants to look "sexy", I have to say, I'm not thrilled about the polo-shirt-and-khakis look often seen on planes. It looks sloppy to me, but that red dress looks simultaneously comfortable/functional and formal.
What dress size does the typical Delta flight attendant wear?
A size 28 seems rather unneccesary to me, but I could be completely wrong about that.
Could be?
If there's a size 28 flight attendant she should be able to get the same uniform as a size 4 one. End of story.
I mean, *are* there flight attendants with a size 28 dress size?
I guess what I'm getting at is if a flight attendant of that size could perform her/his duties.
I don't mean to be anti-fat.
I wear around a size 20-24 and I'm perfectly capable of performing flight attendant duties (although I am not one). There isn't anything inherent about my size that makes it impossible for me to fly on planes or lift heavy things or assist passengers or anything. If I were a few inches taller, I'd probably wear a size 28. Extrapolating from my experience, I'd say that there are at least some women who wear size 28 who are capable of being a flight attendant. Whether there are flight attendants that size is another story, since size based discrimination is pretty ubiquitous.
I know, it's hard to believe, but many fat people, even very fat people, are perfectly capable of performing normal human tasks without collapsing under their own weight.
I don't think she was saying that larger flight attendants weren't competent. Airplanes are really cramped and narrow, so maybe the question is whether there is a logical cut-off point where someone really couldn't be a flight attendant because of their weight. I don't know what size that would be. I don't know how big 28 is either, but the article makes it sound like there are attendants demanding the size. So they should make that size.
I was including "being in a cramped airplane with narrow aisles" in my analysis of whether or not a person my size could do the job.
I'm a size 28, and I'm pretty certain I could perform the duties of a flight attendant. I also think, in the event of an emergency, one might prefer someone with my strength assisting them.
I think that rather than saying that there is a point at which bodies become too big for the planes, we should be saying there is a point at which the planes which are designed and purchased are too small for some bodies to fit/function well. It is a conscious choice, not an inevitability, to make and buy vehicles that exclude some bodies for the sake of possible marginal profit increases. If we, as a society, really valued all people, this would not be the case.
I used to be a size 24 and could still fit down an airplane aisle. I don't know all of the duties of flight attendants, but from what I know I would have been able to do them.
I don't know whether or not there are any size 28 FAs out there, but I can't see weight alone being what would stop it.
Now, mistreatment at the hands of colleagues and passengers relating to weight might deter fat women from pursuing this line of work, which is a whole other, appalling, story.
I've been scanning the comments and so far I haven't seen anyone mention the fact that major airlines DO have weight restrictions already. Great book: The Managed Heart by Arlie Hochschild. It talks a lot specifically about airline stewards. There are a lot of restrictions on appearance (not just wait) that has a lot to do with passengers "comfort."
So keep in mind that not only is such discrimination legal (as others have pointed out), it's already been there for years.
I agree with other posters that sexy uniforms are unnecessary, impractical, ridiculous, and sexist. But on the size limit: don't flight attendants, male and female, have height/weight requirements? I fly all the time, on several different airlines, and can't recall seeing a female flight attendant who would be a size 18 or bigger. Maybe I just didn't notice?
I have never seen a female flight attendant who looked larger than a size 14, but I wonder if discriminatory things like this new uniform keep larger women from trying to be flight attendants in the first place. I could see there being some kind of height and weight limit, though, but only in extremes where the person would be physically unable to do the job.
A lot of this information is incorrect or out of date. I'm close to an employee, here's the scoop.
These uniform changes actually went into effect several years ago. The only reason we're hearing about this is because of the Delta/Northwest merger; Northwest FAs have a union and Delta does not, so the integration is a little shaky these days, particularly as the NW FAs have recently been issued their new Delta uniforms.
The redesign actually included a bajillion new designs, most of which are available in sizes over 18. There's several variations of sharp suiting separates and navy dresses that match the red dress in style (they all have red detailing). So the larger FAs aren't wearing threadbare old rags, but it is true that they can't wear the red dress.
I fly Delta about twice a month, and I have to say I've only seen a FA in the red dress once. I fly out of Atlanta so I see pilots and FAs everywhere I look all the time. Most flight attendants wear the pants or skirt suit or the navy dress.
FYI, the men wear suits, either with a coat or without. They match the women's suits, and have the red detailing. All in all, all of it is really sharp; I'd wear the navy wrap dress or the suits, even the vest. The shirts have this neat cuff with red lining.
Another interesting airline uniform issue is for the women pilots, who are a teeny tiny minority. They're supposed to wear some sort of ridiculous scarf or tab instead of a tie with their suit uniforms, and basically en masse they've all refused and have bought and wear the men's tie.
A lot of this information is incorrect or out of date. I'm close to an employee, here's the scoop.
These uniform changes actually went into effect several years ago. The only reason we're hearing about this is because of the Delta/Northwest merger; Northwest FAs have a union and Delta does not, so the integration is a little shaky these days, particularly as the NW FAs have recently been issued their new Delta uniforms.
The redesign actually included a bajillion new designs, most of which are available in sizes over 18. There's several variations of sharp suiting separates and navy dresses that match the red dress in style (they all have red detailing). So the larger FAs aren't wearing threadbare old rags, but it is true that they can't wear the red dress.
I fly Delta about twice a month, and I have to say I've only seen a FA in the red dress once. I fly out of Atlanta so I see pilots and FAs everywhere I look all the time. Most flight attendants wear the pants or skirt suit or the navy dress.
FYI, the men wear suits, either with a coat or without. They match the women's suits, and have the red detailing. All in all, all of it is really sharp; I'd wear the navy wrap dress or the suits, even the vest. The shirts have this neat cuff with red lining.
Another interesting airline uniform issue is for the women pilots, who are a teeny tiny minority. They're supposed to wear some sort of ridiculous scarf or tab instead of a tie with their suit uniforms, and basically en masse they've all refused and have bought and wear the men's tie.
The point that the union rep made is the red dress is specifically an eye catching color; it's bold and grabs people's attention. You yourself said this is the only full-on red outfit. The others have red piping or detailing. Not having this bright dress in all sizes is in a way telling the larger women that Delta doesn't want them to be seen. They want to hide them in the less eye catching navy color.
And why should only the thinner women be allowed to have all the choices of uniforms available when the larger women only have a few? You're going to design a new uniform? Make it in all the flipping sizes!
That would be reading a whole lot into the situation. I don't have x-ray superpowers.
Ultimately you can't say that the red dress is sexist, or even really, sexy. Its just an attractive dress. This is "Seinfeldian": a beef about nothing.
Why is this even a response to my post? I didn't even write the word sexist anywhere.
Yo, the problem is not that the dress is red. The problem is that the red dress does not come in large sizes. The problem is that fat women are tacitly being told, "stay in the shadows, don't get noticed."
A lot of this information is incorrect or out of date. I'm close to an employee, here's the scoop.
These uniform changes actually went into effect several years ago. The only reason we're hearing about this is because of the Delta/Northwest merger; Northwest FAs have a union and Delta does not, so the integration is a little shaky these days, particularly as the NW FAs have recently been issued their new Delta uniforms.
The redesign actually included a bajillion new designs, most of which are available in sizes over 18. There's several variations of sharp suiting separates and navy dresses that match the red dress in style (they all have red detailing). So the larger FAs aren't wearing threadbare old rags, but it is true that they can't wear the red dress.
I fly Delta about twice a month, and I have to say I've only seen a FA in the red dress once. I fly out of Atlanta so I see pilots and FAs everywhere I look all the time. Most flight attendants wear the pants or skirt suit or the navy dress.
FYI, the men wear suits, either with a coat or without. They match the women's suits, and have the red detailing. All in all, all of it is really sharp; I'd wear the navy wrap dress or the suits, even the vest. The shirts have this neat cuff with red lining.
Another interesting airline uniform issue is for the women pilots, who are a teeny tiny minority. They're supposed to wear some sort of ridiculous scarf or tab instead of a tie with their suit uniforms, and basically en masse they've all refused and have bought and wear the men's tie.
Ah but people like to complain on websites anytime there is something politically incorrect or that takes issue wth their size, rather than look it up they've chosen to take the article on this site as gospel and hope that someone gets some money taken from them for it. Alot of people anyway.
Budget Travel Blog's characterization:
"Flight attendant's union squabbles over the sizes of Delta's Richard Tyler-designed uniforms."
http://current.newsweek.com/budgettravel/2009/07/worth_reading_darn_good_free_m.html
This makes sense because of the smaller planes and aisles. I don't know anyone who wants a flight attendant bumping their elbow and seat as they walk by every few minutes.
Because the flight attendants will bump into peoples' elbows if they're wearing a red dress, but not a navy one? Did you even read what people are complaining about?
Wait, I'm confused. Larger women who wear the red dresses will be likelier to bump your elbows than if they were wearing the other uniforms? Because that's what this is about.
This has nothing to do with ability to perform the job or move through the aisle. All flight attendants have to go through a rigorous training process in which they have to demonstrate their ability to lead evacuations and perform other important safety functions. If a woman couldn't fit down the aisle, she wouldn't be able to pass this training.
Besides, if it were about ability, wouldn't they be doing something similar with male flight attendants?
Skinny flight attendants bump me all the time. Your comment makes no sense. Just mindless fatphobia.
This makes sense because of the smaller planes and aisles. I don't know anyone who wants a flight attendant bumping their elbow and seat as they walk by every few minutes.
Hey I sent this in!
As a 17-year-old, the whole notion of sexified flight attendants is so antiquated to me, especially the notion that their job exists for the sole purpose to entertain/please male passengers..
It appalling to see this still happening. I hope Delta smartens up and learns to treat their employees with more dignity!
About a year ago my friend got a job as a hostess at Moxie's, with the uniforms being tight black shirts. When she was finally given hers, it she was unable to pull it over her chest. She's only a "C", and easily within a healthy BMI for someone her size; they apparently gave her the "large", to make matters worse. She went to complain to the manager, who told her to lose weight and make it fit. My friend ended up walking out; she claims this to be the most demeaning moment she's experienced and I don't blame her. I can't imagine how many women end up with poorer body images than before all thanks to work place uniforms; personally, I think a name tag should suffice for a uniform instead of discriminating clothing.
You heard it here first.
If the NW flight attendants union wins this they will give Delta management a gift.
The two separate flight attendant groups will be voting on whether or not to unionize as one group.
Delta management will immediately say that as a result of the lawsuit, the red dress is no longer authorized in ANY size. That way every remaining authorized uniform will be available up to size 28.
They will then publicize to the flight attendants that this is a result of the action taken by the union. The same union they are being asked to elect as their representative.
The flight attendants that liked the red dress will not be very happy.
Perhaps this is analogous to shoe size. I wear a size 13, and shoes that look great in the display size 8 end up looking like clown shoes when they're scaled up to a size 13. Maybe the new proportions of the dress make it look dreadful if it is scaled above a size 18.
Here is the response I received from Delta Airlines, I have omitted my name and e-mail:
Dear Ms. X,
Thank you for your e-mail to Delta Air Lines.
With Richard Tyler's guidance and expertise, we created the largest uniform collection in the airline industry - a collection that is flattering and functional, offering a variety of choices for everyone. The overwhelming majority of pre-merger Northwest flight attendants are excited to wear the Richard Tyler Collection after more than a decade in their old uniform. Our uniform policies for the Richard Tyler Collection have been in place since
2006 and the program has been very successful at Delta. In fact, the sizing of our red dress has not been an issue with Delta flight attendants since the program's inception three years ago. These are typical union campaign tactics leading up to an election.
Again, thank you for writing. Your comments have been sent to the responsible department for internal review. We value your business and hope you will continue to make Delta your airline of choice.
Sincerely,
Alan Lee
Online Customer Support Desk
http://www.delta.com