This weekly Saturday column "Ask Professor Foxy" will regularly contain sexually explicit material. This material is likely not safe for work viewing. The title of the column will include the major topic of the post, so please read the topic when deciding whether or not to read the entire column.
Hello,
This may be rambling, but here goes...
ok. A few months ago me and a few friends went on a road trip. it was supposed to be a fun weekend at the beach etc etc, but something happened between me and a (now former) male friend that ruined it.
I never drink (can't control myself when i do), but this "friend" _always_ harassed me about it. He made me feel like i was no fun, or whatever, and just would not shut up about my not drinking. we ended up at a party and he badgered me all night about not drinking, so, i did. a lot.
i thought i was safe around my friends and that nothing could happen. big mistake.
the next thing i really remember was showing him my breasts...and then suddenly i was giving him a blow job. and then i don't remember anything else.
we decided to tell our SOs. we cheated after all, so i guess it was the right thing to do.
soon after, his angry girlfriend comes over to my house late at night and demands to know why i raped her boyfriend. was i trying to get myself pregnant so i could have his child? did i plan this whole beach vacation so i could take advantage of the poor guy? then she tells me all these things that i must have done, things that i don't remember at all. she comes over again, a few days later, to "forgive" me and hands me a piously written letter saying that she forgave me for sinning. then, finally, the "friend" comes over and begs me to take a pregnancy test. when i tell him to fuck off, he offers to _pay_ for it, as if that would make a difference. drama, right?
worse, my all my friends and his friends found out and now i am the slut who threatened their perfect relationship.
these past months have been hell. i feel guilty about drinking, cheating (or not?) and i don't know what the hell happened. was it assault? was it just (my) drunken mistake? i can't have sex with my bf without thinking about this - actually i can't stop thinking about this period. i can't masturbate without thinking about it. i can't think about sex at all without thinking about this.
so, my question is this: how do i move on with my life? how do i stop thinking about this?
thanks for taking the time.
Hi Time -
I am sorry. Sorry that you were victimized once by a man and then victimized again by your friends. I am responding to your question, but with a major caveat: this answer is only a start. You need to find a local support group that can give you space to work through these issues with a therapist and others who have had similar experiences. Here are two good places to start: National Sexual Violence Resource Center and RAINN: Rape, Abuse, and Incest National Network (RAINN).
Rape and sexual assault have many definitions under the law depending on where you live. For your purposes, I think they are irrelevant. In my opinion, you were assaulted. You were assaulted by someone who, to some extent, planned this and that makes it feel even worse. You made your discomfort clear, you made your vulnerabilities clear (your lack of control when you drink), and he took advantage of this.
I am sorry your friends did not protect you in this situation or its aftermath. I am using the word "friends" loosely here, because they are not friends. Friends step up when you start flashing. They watch you and intervene when you are out of control. They stop you from doing things you should not do or things you may regret the next day. And real friends certainly do not blame you after the fact.
His girlfriend did what women are trained to do: blame the other woman. Her "perfect" boyfriend couldn't possibly have cheated and surely he did not set up the night and take advantage of another woman, therefore, in her mind, it has to be your fault. You cannot change her mind and it is not worth your time to try. You seem to swing between realizing that her accusations are baseless and ridiculous and internalizing them and blaming yourself. DON'T. None of this your fault: not that night, not her reaction, not how it impacted their relationship, not its impact on your relationship, not how your "friends" reacted.
Your sexual reaction to these events (inability to put it out of your mind when being sexual with yourself or others) is completely normal. Many survivors of sexual assault have the same experience. With support, many survivors are also able to engage in healthy sexual relationships again. It takes time.
As difficult as this sounds, you need to find a way to develop new friendships and relationships with people who are supportive and who would have stepped in. You need to find a professional to help you work through all of this and to provide support as you move forward. Please contact a local support group and start to work through all of these things. You've taken a really big first step by writing in, now move into the next step.
If you have a question for Professor Foxy, send it to ProfessorFoxyATfeministingDOTcom.





After thinking about this a bit, I think I agree with Professor Foxy that you were assaulted. At first I wondered, but what if he was drunk too? And then I thought, and you were doing it willingly..
But none of that matters in the end. He knew what your weakness was, he pushed and pushed and pushed you to put yourself in a vulnerable position, and he was the one who exploited your state, knowing full well that you don't drink because that vulnerability is something you want to avoid.
Feel bad for the poor girlfriend. Can you imagine being emotionally attached to a dick like that? None of this is your fault, and you're brave for actually asking about this in such a public way.
My thoughts and prayers are with you, and I am sure your situation will get better. What an awful ordeal.
I agree that this young woman was assaulted and taken advantage of. Coercing someone to drink against their will and then taking advantage of the situation for personal or sexual gain is assault.
His girlfriend probably only got HIS side of the story, there's a really good chance that the story she heard was that Time got her boyfriend drunk and took advantage of him. It's always amazing how men (and women too, I suppose) will warp a story so they don't get in trouble while they throw the other party under the bus.
I don't think you or many of the other people posting here understand what coercion means. It doesn't mean peer pressure or badgering someone; it means threatening them or physically forcing them to do something.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/coercing
2. to compel to an act or choice.
http://tinyurl.com/dgf737
"to cause to do through pressure or necessity, by physical, moral or intellectual means."
...nope, pretty sure Nietzsche is the one who doesn't know what it means.
Hahaha I even spelled coerce wrong when I googled it for you. It was THAT easy.
http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/coerce?view=uk
"coerce
/koerss/
• verb persuade (an unwilling person) to do something by using force or threats"
Or, the entire MW definition:
"1 : to restrain or dominate by force
2 : to compel to an act or choice
3 : to achieve by force or threat "
Of those, only the second, the only one you cited is possibly relevant here, so lets define compel:
"1: to drive or urge forcefully or irresistibly
2: to cause to do or occur by overwhelming pressure "
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/compel
Your interpretation seems to fall barely within the scope of the of the possible definitions (or at least one of them), so you are technically correct ("the best kind of correct", http://www.geocities.com/zoidberg_fan/episodes/hermes_requisitioned.html), but coerced carries a whole host of alternate interpretations that nagged, convinced, bothered, bugged, teased, or even manipulated don't.
Sorry for continuing the off-topicness, but *points at self* language nerd.
I'll take your language nerd and raise you a *language professional* with advanced degrees.
In terms of intensionality, the word "coerce" is appropriate to the experience described in the OP.
I don't care about the use of the word, frankly--I care about how completely ignorant it is for you and "Nietzsche" to play Académie française here. The connotation (AND denotation) of coerce is clear in the context of this thread.
Not to mention the language issue is a red herring...
Summary: GTFO ROFLOMGBBQ
I appreciate that you don't want to continue the derailing that Nietzche started and were both continuing, but the mere fact that you're a language professional doesn't change the fact that harrassment is not coercion (outside of places where the balance of power is very different from between friends).
It's not good, it's possibly manipulative, it's wrong, but it's not coercion.
And if you don't care about the word, why did you cherry-pick the definition? Why say it all?
Actually, ignore those questions and lets both GTFO of this thread.
I agree that this young woman was assaulted and taken advantage of. Coercing someone to drink against their will and then taking advantage of the situation for personal or sexual gain is assault.
His girlfriend probably only got HIS side of the story, there's a really good chance that the story she heard was that Time got her boyfriend drunk and took advantage of him. It's always amazing how men (and women too, I suppose) will warp a story so they don't get in trouble while they throw the other party under the bus.
Are you saying she had no free will, no choice to drink? If so, I read the letter incorrectly. I thought she said that she gave into pressure. I've done the same thing (and regret it) ...
Recently, I went to the pediatrician with my newborn son. The doctor pressured me into give him four vaccinations. I felt horrible and angry, like he was talking to me like I was stupid. I told my husband that he must go with me to the next visit, so I wouldn't give into the pressure again. That being said, if the doctor had physically restrained me while giving my son shots or threatened to call child protective services if I didn't let him give my son the shots, I would have called the police. That's "coercion" and most definitely illegal, on top of unethical.
Perhaps the distinction we need is between illegal coercion and unethical badgering. The latter is definitely something to worry about. I have a young daughter who's spirited and assertive and feisty; I'm concerned that she never be pushed around by men/boys. I know what that's like.
Oh god, you are one of those parents. Thanks for putting other people's kids at risk because of your anti-science nonsense.
I find this comment offensive but unfortunately I have no connection to the moderators and can't get them to delete it.
Mothers and parents trying to do their best for their kids are fair targets and you can attack them with impunity because they're "Cis" and privileged. Go for it!
Moreover, you don't have to listen to their divergent opinions, which may very well be deleted. Lucky you!
I find this comment offensive but unfortunately I have no connection to the moderators and can't get them to delete it.
Mothers and parents trying to do their best for their kids are fair targets and you can attack them with impunity because they're "Cis" and privileged. Go for it!
Moreover, you don't have to listen to their divergent opinions, which may very well be deleted. Lucky you!
I pretty much agree with Prof. Foxy; he's at best an complete asshole and at worst a rapist. I'm curious why there was no response to this part:
"the "friend" comes over and begs me to take a pregnancy test. when i tell him to fuck off, he offers to _pay_ for it, as if that would make a difference. drama, right?"
It might be a good idea for her to take a pregnancy test (although you may not want to tell him about it), unless she's on some sort of birth control that she didn't mention. Not knowing won't fix anything, it'll just make it harder to deal with later.
I couldn't disagree more. His insistence only served as a reminder of what he did. He had no concern about pregnancy before he assaulted her, why should he have the right to demand she take an invasive test? The result of that test is none of his business until she decides it is. Furthermore, I'm sure she is smart enough to figure out penis in vagina equals baby making without the jerk bringing his girlfriend into the equation.
I'm not saying she should take one because he told her to, I'm saying it's a good idea for her to take one regardless, and she has no reason to tell him or let him know what the results are if she doesn't want to.
a few months have passed since the assault. i'm sure she had already thought of the test.
True, I guess it's irrelevant now.
I was contacted by a former boyfriend a few months back and, after reminiscing with him over a period of weeks, I began to remember things about my college days I had forgotten -- as in, recovered memories of a sexual assault by another student. (I was raped while unconscious from alcohol.) These memories debilitated me.
I sought help from the local sexual assault crisis center and have entered counseling with a very compassionate therapist with whom I have established a good rapport.
Even after a few weeks, I feel so much better. I was plagued with obsessive thoughts and couldn't sleep. I was weeping a lot. Once I began to unburden myself of thoughts and feelings, and get some perspective on things, I felt much better.
It is quite typical for women to be blamed for the circumstances of their own assault. It was one of the reasons I never told anyone about what had happened.
Please don't wait decades like I did to get help. Find a therapist or counselor who can be an ally and get some support for what you're going through right now.
In my case, I was able to get counseling at my local YWCA. (Am currently unemployed and uninsured.) The first six sessions are free; after that a very reasonable sliding scale kicks in. It did take a while to get an appointment, and during that time, I did a lot of reading, and took advantage of online support groups.
I wish you the very best. You are not alone.
I didn't know that the YWCA offered 6 free counseling sessions. I really appreciate knowing that and will definitely pass that bit of information on, should I meet anyone who is in need of help, but can't afford a therapist. I know more than a few people who have trouble with this, after they graduate from college (since college usually provides free or extremely affordable counseling) and are no longer on their parents' insurance. Six sessions may not be enough, but it's certainly a start. Thanks for the tip and thanks for posting your story.
I'm not sure this is something that's offered by all YWCA branches. I was referred to my local YWCA after doing a search at RAINN.org for services available in my area.
I would recommend anyone looking for services to use the RAINN.org website. Or call the local YWCA directly to see if they offer counseling services.
I am very impressed by the quality of the services I have received, and I intend to support the YWCA when I am financially able to do so. I feel very fortunate to have found them at a time when I was troubled emotionally and financially.
thank you
It's not like he was helpless, receiving oral sex against his will. He had to have permitted it, and there were plenty of ways he could have refused it and not taken advantage of you.
Granted he was probably drunk as well, but if you are going to coerce/pressure someone into drinking, you should be held accountable for your actions even while drunk.
Let's not bring in the old "men can't be raped" including orally raped crap here. It's just not applicable to this woman's sexual assault.
You're way off base. Consenting to drinking is NOT consenting to sex. Much like wearing a short skirt is not consenting to sex, and kissing is not consenting to sex. And if she was too drunk to remember what happened, she was too drunk to consent.
What part of she was too drunk to know what was going on did you miss?
She says when the GF came over she had no idea about half the things the GF was talking about. That doesn't sound like someone who was all there and able to consent, does it?
Check your slut-shaming at the door.
Feministing, are you SERIOUSLY letting these rape-apologizing assholes post here? This site is beyond ridiculous, and while I understand that "dialouge" is one of the goals of this site, victim blaming, and playing the "she was not raped, she just drank herself unconscious, and unconscious people can totally consent, har har" is ridiculously disrespectful and makes it clear that you cater to a decidedly unfeminist, and unwomanist audience. I know that your goal is to reach people who might not yet be out feminists or womanists, but the fact that there isn't even ONE link to a fem 101 article on why this is RAPE and not just a stupid slut drinking herself into trouble means you don't actually give a shit about the cause you purport to be a part of.
This just put the final nail in the coffin for why I absolutely can't read your circus of a website anymore. Thanks for what you've done, but you're an irrelevant joke now, and I can't deal with that.
As for all you rape apologizing assholes, I'm glad to be reminded once again for why I hate people and have given up on the human race.
I hope you are referring to the people who said it's all her fault and not the rest of us trying to have an open dialogue about it. We definitely do live in a rape culture, but I really do not believe this is a "she was drinking. she deserves it!" type of post.
I agree the all-caps post upthread is written in a very hostile way, and probably should be deleted and rewritten more politely.
But nowhere at all in the original post does it say she "drank herself unconscious." There is no indication that she was unconscious, just that she was drunk, but the description sounds like she was still actively doing things. No one is saying that its ok to rape an unconscious person.
They've deleted the offending comments. I can't believe the slut-shaming and victim-blaming running rampant on this thread! But that doesn't mean that Feministing supports this blaming viewpoint. As I said earlier, they've deleted these comments, and while I know you wrote your post before said comments were deleted, I'm wondering why you think that a few bad (well, horrible) commenters are indicative of the spirit of Feministing as a whole.
Moderation is important. It can be very triggering for people who have been raped to have to deal with victim blaming or slut shaming trolls.
"I never drink (can't control myself when i do), but this "friend" _always_ harassed me about it. He made me feel like i was no fun, or whatever, and just would not shut up about my not drinking. we ended up at a party and he badgered me all night about not drinking, so, i did. a lot." - Topic
This obviously isn't "just a stupid slut drinking herself into trouble". It obviously deals with intoxicated rape and heavy peer pressure.
Also, I wouldn't blame Feministing. I would blame the trolls that post here for rape-apologizing.
Firstly, the person who did this was not a stranger but you're too busy jumping on your rape apologist horse to care about reading properly.
And no, taking any substance does not mean you consent to sex in that altered state of mind. There are reasons why we have laws against having sex with people who are under the influence and it's because their grip on events is shaky and they do not have the information or rational to consent.
But, even if this was not something that could be prosecuted in a court of law that does not make the OP's feelings of assault any less valid. She was quite clearly taken advantage of and has been subjected to any number of slut-shaming techniques when it seems clear that people are picking and choosing who they demonise in this situation.
News flash! Drunk men can be rapists. They can take advantage of people when drunk. The fact that they are drunk doesn't make their actions any less rape.
It's a legal grey area. If this case came to court it would be almost impossible to prosecute due to everyone drinking. Doesn't make it any less an act of rape or assult.
I think, perhaps, feministing should consider not allowing comments on Ask Foxy posts (at least when they are about highly sensitive topics). Although many of the comments can be helpful, the letter writers shouldn't have to be subjected to the kind of abuse that some commenters unleash. Some topics should only be handled with careful sensitivity, and too many people allow the anonimity of the internet to give them an excuse to be cruel.
This is a public blog with public posts. If someone wants private advice, this isn't the place to go for it. Also, if you look back at most of the Professor Foxy posts, there are lots of people participating in discussions about how they have similar problems, or giving more advice. I don't think it would be a good idea to shut that down. It would certainly make me a lot less interested in reading the column.
It's not a problem when people make respectful comments about the topic, but when these rape apologists jackasses post shit it DOES become a problem. Time shouldn't have to be put through that. Nor should the many posters that visit this site that are rape survivors like myself. Reading some of the comments on this board have made me so angry I've been screaming at my computer to the point of tears.
I wonder if moderated posting, at least for Prof. Foxy posts, would be the best solution. That would let the good comments go through, but would prevent rape apologist comments from showing up on the site.
This is an extremely good idea. Professor Foxy's posts open up a lot of valuable discussion on the site, so I don't think comments should be shut down. However, I do think that comments should be moderated (as in, approved before they are posted), because these are not just sensitive issues, but personal ones. It's unfortunate that moderating comments will curtail discussion to some extent- if it takes longer for comments to be posted, less people will comment- however, the individuals submitting questions deserve to be treated with sensitivity and kindness. Perhaps the moderators can plan to post Professor Foxy's columns at a time when they will be around to moderate, so comments will be checked quickly. I don't know how much trouble that would be, but I think many of us would greatly appreciate it if something could be worked out.
I'm horrified by how so many commentators want to gloss over this woman's feelings to tell her that they know much better than her how she should feel and how she wasn't raped or assaulted.
Just because something wouldn't fit a legal definition or wouldn't be prosecutable doesn't make it any less rape, or invalidate the OP's feelings on the subject. The legal system has to be there to protect the majority and there will be cases were it doesn’t fit perfectly for everyone involved. This is one of them. It doesn’t make what happened any less awful for the OP or mean that she deserves any less help.
And yes, there is a lot of slut-shaming and “Oh she was drunk” going on in these threads and those people should read what they’ve written out loud to themselves to get a good idea of how awful they sound.
I went through something similar as a teenager, although in your case I see a much more deliberate attempt to put you in a situation where you were vulnerable than happened in mine.
What was incredibly helpful to me was to realize that regardless of how the guy in question experienced the night, or how the people around me viewed it, I felt incredibly violated and taken advantage of.
My case probably wouldn't hold up in court. I've never felt 100% that the guy should, say, spend 20 years in prison. That confused me for a long time. At some point I finally realized that regardless of how I rated how malicious/conscious his actions were, my experience, my emotions, and my need to heal didn't change.
Get some help. Get tested, both for pregnancy and STDs. Don't talk to this guy, and don't talk to his girlfriend. They are both going to try to manipulate you and convince you that what you experienced isn't real.
Good friends would have cut you off. Even just one good friend could have stepped in, taken you home and gotten you to bed by yourself. If your friends were there when this happened they have a personal interest in viewing it as consensual and your choice/fault in order not to think of themselves as bad people for not stepping in.
thanks
Ugh, this post hits close to home. I was in a very similar situation just last weekend. I went out with a clouple of friends that I thought I could trust, a guy and a girl. The other girl and I are real light-weights when it comes to drinking. Neither one of us had ever even been drunk before that night.
I know that I drank too much and that was a mistake. By the end of the evening, I was blacking out and the things I was doing seemed almost like an out-of-body experience, like I was observing someone else doing them. Anyways, he tried to have sex with me. I'm very conflicted over whether this was rape or not. On the one hand, I'm pretty sure I said yes at some point. On the other hand, I was clearly not in a state to consciously conscent and he was a lot less drunk that either I or my friend. Plus, after I'd managed to push him off and gone to sleep, I woke up to him trying to finger me,which is clearly not conscentual.
It's just very hard when you yourself don't know what to call it.
Milena, what you described is rape, in my opinion. You were too intoxicated to consent, no matter what you said/did. And as you said, he was much less intoxicated, and as such he should have stopped the encounter before it went too far. Not to mention the fact that him trying to finger you while you were passed out is obviously wrong and indicative of his lack of concern over a "little thing" like consent. I'm so sorry you had to experience this.
You were assaulted. I'm very sorry you have come to know the pain of sexual assault trauma. It's not easy, but it can be survived. Hugs if you want them, and make sure you get some counselling. It's very important to the healing process.
Thank you both for the kind words. I am in the process of getting into counselling (and an STI test, of course.)
god that sucks. i'd hug you if i could :(
I'm troubled by a lot of the comments here as well. It appears that a lot of the commenters are trying to determine, like jurors, whether or not sexual assault occurred according to some sort of quasi-legal definition.
It doesn't sound like this young woman is seeking any sort of criminal or civil redress for what happened. The reason she wrote is that she's having a lot of difficulty in dealing with the aftermath of an encounter that at best sounds exploitative and at worst sounds coerced.
Even if this incident might not meet any legal definition of sexual assault, she still has to deal with the FEELINGS associated with this type of encounter. She's dealing with fallout from friends and acquaintances who are making her responsible for the actions of others. She's feeling ashamed and angry for having been pushed into drinking and the fallout from that. She's troubled by obsessive thoughts. It's affecting her relationships and her level of functioning.
Pointing out any areas of her perceived culpability isn't going to make her feel BETTER about this situation. If anything, it may delay her getting help and support.
Please, step back from trying to make judgments about what "really" happened and try to support this young woman. She's hurting. She deserves our compassion.
The title of the post is "Was I Assaulted?", which is why people are answering that question. I think a lot of people have also included comments saying that even if it wasn't really assault or rape, her friends are treating her very unfairly and she doesn't deserve this at all.
Its possible that Professor Foxy added that title, not the original letter writer. If that's the case, then maybe she shouldn't have, because it takes away from the other questions asked at the end like "how do I move on?". But maybe it was the subject of the original email, who knows. In any case, its there now, its the first thing we all read, and it puts everyone in a frame of mind of reading it and trying to answer that question-- was she assaulted?
My opinion is that while it doesn't sound like assault in any legal way, the letter writer was still treated very badly by her friends and deserves support and space to heal. Just like if your best friend suddenly decides they hate you and spreads nasty rumors about you, it feels like a horrible betrayal and can hurt for years-- but it isn't a crime. This girl trusted her friends, including this guy friend, and they all betrayed that trust. My advice would be to try to find better friends.
Her friends should have stepped in, and I agree that she needs to find new friends as the ones that she seems to currently have arent very supportive of her.
I feel that this situation falls in the gray area, legally wise, and I would hope that there are laws written to protect both men and women from this in the future.
I love Feministing, but I agree that victim blaming comments should not be allowed, especially in this sort of a post. And frankly, the use of words such as 'tits' and 'fucking' make me cringe when talking about a sexual assault story. People need to be more respectful.
Gimme a fu**ing break. "Who's to say he enjoyed" pushing alcohol on her and then getting a blow job? Are you for real?
So, it's not rape if you enjoy it?
A male friend of mine got a hand job from a girl. They were both drunk, and he said no but was a little too drunk to really push her off him. He came, but he was pretty traumatized by it.
Because your friend was raped.
Sex that you don't give your consent to, and I don't mean, "didn't say no," I mean, "said, very clearly, yes, please do this," is rape. It doesn't matter if you're male, female, neither, both, gay, straight, bi, whatever... if someone touches you in a sexual way and you don't want them to do it, it's assault. It doesn't matter what you've had to eat, drink, smoke, or whatever.
And yes, that's the law. Sexual contact without consent is sexual assault.
If this were a hypothetical situation presented in an ethics class,I think the was she/wasn't she debate would be more valid.
However, this is a real person who feels like she's been violated. And if she feels like she was assaulted then she needs to proceeds like it. Maybe she needs to start with making a report to the police department and talking with an officer to see if something criminal did take place. (assuming she lives in an area with helpful authorities)
Otherwise, she needs to join a support group or seek counseling. She needs to begin healing. And most importantly, she needs new friends!! :-)
I definitely have to agree with Professor Foxy - you were definitely sexually assaulted. He bullied you into drinking - and once drunk he coerced you into sexual activity.
By any reasonable definition - and many legal ones - that's sexual assault.
And his girlfriend and your friends are assholes for blaming you for his rapist conduct.
But where does it say he coerced her into the sex? That's the part that I see missing. It only says he coerced to drink. After that she implies that she initiated the sexual contact. That's why I'm confused.
In effect, the letter writer told the guy upfront that she's unfit to consent if she's drinking. She says she told him that she didn't want to drink because she couldn't control herself if she did. But he pressured her to do it anyway.
If someone tells you upfront that they can't control themselves when they're drunk, then you're raping them if you have sex with them in that condition--regardless of whether they seem to want it at the time. You were apprised of the situation.
This is a really important and accurate point. The guy knowingly coerced the woman into a situation where she was not capable of consent.
I never drink (can't control myself when i do), but this "friend" _always_ harassed me about it. He made me feel like i was no fun, or whatever, and just would not shut up about my not drinking.
To me this implies only that he harassed her about not drinking, not that he necessarily knew the reasons why she didn't drink.
Nice moment of belittling my reply to you there. I do like how you try to make yourself sound more intelligent by trying to frame this as a discussion rather than you laying into a woman for being drunk and assaulted.
I have only your words to judge you on, and yes, you do come off like a rape apologist. And I find your ideas of how conscious some can be of their decisions while under the influence worry as it seems you don’t draw the line anywhere but at unconscious.
Why shouldn’t it be “Don’t have sex with people under the influence” because that’s taking responsibility, isn’t it?
You're right, I belittled your reply. That's because I felt you were making an ad hominem attack without cause. I'll confess, I'm new to this place, and maybe I should be willing to give a little bit into the mores around here instead of asking that everyone adapt to my debate style. But I don't think you're being fair, either. I have what I believe to be a legitimate difference of opinion, and I don't appreciate the label "rape apologist".
Conscious versus unconscious is a blurry line. My statements have been intended to address this particular situation. In this case, she was actively moving. Her muscles were firing, as a result of her (psychoactively doped) will. When you are actively participating in something, I don't think it's fair to label it nonconsensual.
In this case, it was an altered consent, but as I've said before, I believe that when you take a psychoactive, you're implicitly taking responsibility for what your alter-ego will do (for, at the very least, as long as it is active).
If the rule was "don't have sex under the influence", nobody would bother to throw parties anymore. I have more strident thoughts in this regard, but in deference to other posters who've called for more support, I'll withhold them until a time when the situation isn't so personal.
"When you are actively participating in something, I don't think it's fair to label it nonconsensual."
I strongly disagree; movement or "active participation" does not necessarily equal consensual participation. For example, an assaulter could be holding a knife to the victim's throat and telling him/her to "move your hips." I also don't think there's a simple, clear definition of what "active participation" means.
That's twisting the situation. There wasn't a threat of bodily harm, and trying to conflate that with the current discussion is disingenuous.
That's ridiculous. Just because a person does things doesn't mean they know what they're doing, especially if they were coerced into becoming intoxicated.
I understand where you're coming from- plenty of people have sex while intoxicated and that's totally fine. However, you cannot legally consent to sex while intoxicated. When you have sex with someone who is drunk, or when you have sex while drunk, you had better be sure that the other person wants to have sex. Because you are, legally speaking, walking on thin ice. If you disagree, take it up with the law.
You've clearly never been in the position of being assaulted. You act nothing like you think you would. I was completely sober when it happened to me and I could barely react. I was terrified, and paralysed by that fear. I can't imagine how it would be when you're drunk. Even if your argument had any logical merit, its place here in a thread where a woman is seeking comfort is cold and callous. Way to go!
What the fuck type of parties do you go to?
I go to parties to talk to people, dance and meet up with my friends. And funnily enough, the rule about no sex with drunk people under the influence hasn't stopped these parties.
Hi all -
You may notice I've deleted some of the comments to this thread. Not only does feministing have a "no victim blaming" policy, but this isn't just an abstract conversation. This is a real woman with real feelings and a real situation. For those of you responding with any sort of "she was drunk, she deserved it, she allowed it" type of response, please think how you would respond if this happened to you, your best friend, your sister. Think how she/you would feel seeing this.
I've deleted some comments and will delete others that appear to blame "Time." Not just for feministing's policy, but for time.
Thanks,
Professor Foxy
The title of the post is "Was I assaulted." You are deleting every comment that answers "no." Why bother even posting the question in the place?
It's possible to argue that someone wasn't assaulted without BLAMING them. Maybe (not in this case, necessarily, but perhaps in others) in a "bad shit happens and it might not be anyone's fault" sort of way.
No, it's not. Because their will was subverted, it was assault. If it was not assault, their will was not subverted. If their will was not subverted, then it happened in accordance with their desires. If it happened in accordance with their desires, they bear some responsibility. Therefore, if it was not assault, they bear some responsibility.
Syllogism.
Don't you see a difference between responsibility and blame?
Why is it so easy for us as a society to think about sex in terms of whether or not the woman is blame-worthy?
What I'm saying is that we need a way to discuss victims' responsibility, should we need to discuss that in the interests of helping prevent future assaults, in a way that doesn't automatically assign blame to them. Responsibility and blame are NOT the same thing. You can make a bad decision and have something bad happen *to you* as a result, but that doesn't mean you should be shamed.
This applies to cases of assault as well as consensual but regrettable sex.
...no?
"blame /ble?m/ 1. to hold responsible" (dictionary.com)
Now, I would argue that there *is* a difference between finding someone responsible/to blame, and shaming them for that. The latter has not been my intent, and I'm sorry if it's come off that way. I have simply been trying to offer my perspective on the situation, to go along with the many shows of solidarity. I think a balanced emotional recovery incorporates both of those things.
Okay, blame has a negative connotation. That's what I thought you were trying to get at. Thanks for clearing it up.
Professor Foxy was naming and summing up the content of the letter, and because it's HER job in HER column, she answered the question. After all, the writer asked HER. And she gave a clear answer, one that is really important and happens to deal with a sensitive issue, so no, comments that blame the victim really are not appropriate.
What the writer is describing is a very common experience because many people are sexually assaulted without actually understanding that that is what happened. She's confused and traumatized by it, it's been haunting her, but she doesn't understand why because "it wasn't rape." It's internalized rape-apologia and victim blaming, and it's preventing her from dealing with what happened to her. So that's why that crap DOESN'T belong here.
Is debating the wisdom of that policy also verboten?
As a corollary, does the "no victim blaming" policy apply only to cases like this one where there is a specific person involved? Or is it a blanket policy preventing any disagreement?
I don't think you deleted any of my posts, but I gotta say I think you went too far with the deleting. Some posts were definitely offensive and unconstructive (like the one that was in all caps) but it seems that some calm and well reasoned posts have disappeared just because they disagreed with you. Also see my comment below regarding how unreadable the thread is now-- it would make more sense to leave something like "post deleted" because as it is, a lot of the comments that are left were in reply to something else and make no sense on their own.
If you don't want people to give their opinion about a specific case, its probably not a good idea to post it on a public website with a title that specifically asks whether or not it was assault.
You know, the funny thing is that I've heard a lot of people argue on here that exposing your genitals to someone without their permission is sexual assault. Drunk or not, flashing your tits to an unsuspecting person would definitely qualify.
haha although obviously breasts aren't genitals. It's still the same in spirit, though.
The rape apologism in this comment thread makes me sick to my stomach. People can be so thoughtless and cruel.
My best wishes to you, Time. I hope you can find a safer space to work through the aftermath of his betrayal (both at the time AND the subsequent lying to make you look like the bad guy) than is being provided by your current friends and by some of the comment thread here.
This sex column is turning Saturday into derisive feminist trigger topic day. Totally ruins my weekend productivity checking back here to see where the conversation goes. I think there is some genuine feminist conversation going on with some sensitivity to the realities of sexual violation, but it's the obviously anti-feminist trolls that bother me. This isn't a place for those people, and there should be an increased presence of moderation on these posts. I can't imagine how the OP feels right now (although, I actually can to some degree, though less in the sense of getting it from anonymous internet people about my specific situation). Is there a policy about feministing moderation procedures? What is the policy on trolls?
I'm in the "this was assault" camp. However, I think it is important to remember that Prof Foxy said that legal definitions are irrelevant to this conversation. In my state, marital rape was legal in one form up until a couple of years ago, so legal definitions do not define what is experienced as assault. This isn't a trial. We're trying to help someone that is obviously suffering from sexual violation deal. I've had to get used to the fact that the vast majority of people that have raped people will never get that "sex offender" stamp by the state, so legal has little to do with it.
These "was I raped" questions are damn hard to deal with. I admire feministing's attempt to tackle some of the most sensitive issues facing feminism in the world today, but the internet is a scary place for dialogue in some ways (see above).
What's also difficult about these conversation is about how crucial context can be, as was seen in the situation with the guy's GF. Her reaction was loaded with issues in and of itself. This is the story that I struggled with as a teen, as it goes to show how people can twist feminist logic to their own agenda.
When I was 14, a 20yo guy came into my life. I was sexually confused at the time, alienated from my peers and had long been gaining the validation one seeks from peers from adults in my life. I trusted them and wanted their attention more than anything. He came into my life like a mentor, but ended up using that trust to get me to do sexual things with him. He didn't define it as a relationship. It was educational and therapeutic. Things obviously affected me very badly, being manipulated and used in this way, and we stopped communicating. This gives an idea of his personality and my situation.
At 15, he came back into my life and pressured me to tell my parents I was staying at a friends house and come to an overnight party with him and some other people. After some badgering I agreed. I said I wasn't drinking and he promised not to drink a lot. Not what happened. He got SCREAMING drunk. He insisted on buying me some vodka, the only thing I'd ever drunk before, but I was afraid to drink and thus stayed sober. He got sick, and me and another girl (two other girls there, both his age) helped him to bed. He begged me to stay and talk to him and I did. He started physically pushing and badgering me to go down on him. I said no, for the first time to anyone, but was ignored. He kept on and eventually I didn't feel like I had a choice. The ensuing scenario became humiliating and violent. When he came back later in the night, I let him do what he wanted with me, do what he asked me to do, in large part because I wanted a little of my power back from the awful thing that had just happened.
In the morning I didn't want to believe what had happened so I didn't say anything. I thought to myself, he was drunk, didn't know what he was doing. Maybe it was my fault because I was sober and should have been able to stop it. I was in shock and pain. He took me home. I get an email from him a few days later where he says I raped him. Claims he can't remember what happened, and because I was sober, it was my fault it happened and it was done against his will.
This destroyed me, because it put me in the position of either it is my fault and I'm a rapist, or he's a manipulative asshole and he's a rapist. This helped me begin to dispell the delusions I was laboring under. Suffering, I told a couple cousins, who helped me accept that it was rape on several levels (statutory if nothing else) and I went to the police. Nothing came of it of course, as nothing ever comes of these things, but it accomplished keeping him out of my life in the future.
I was told by a mutual friend later that he told people he was raped over that summer, but neglects to tell the details of who they were or how old they were.
He was drunk (later entered treatment for alcoholism) and I was sober. But obviously, several aspects of that situation made him the guilty party. I was underage and he was the adult in the situation. He had taken advantage of me before. He intimidated me. However, he twisted the feminist logic of inebriation negating consent to negate his responsibility in the situation. This is douchebag behavior.
So, I think we need to have conversations on the nuances of consent and sexual assault and the emotional experience of it. Trying to fit a complex violation like sexual assault into a legal box (such as the role of alcohol in legal consent) is extremely problematic when trying to discuss the emotional impact of it. The legal conversation is a whole different can of worms. What I would like to see is the discussion of the nuances of consent without denying the traumatic experiences of the victim or the application of logical "formulas" across a broad swath of situations.
ib4 "what about the menz!?!?!?"
that's awful :(
I'm really sorry.
Thank you for posting your story.
Thank you for sharing your story.
Your last full paragraph had me saying "yes! yes, very much this!" at my dusty computer screen.
thank you for sharing this
It appears my posts have started to disappear. Well, before I give up on this place for good (yes, yes, I'm sure that wouldn't be distressing to many of you), could I ask why?
Mine were deleted too. Professor Foxy wrote in a comment above that it was due to a "no victim blaming" policy.
Maybe next time you should try to not have such hostile posts where you type in all caps about a women "showing her fucking tits!" It's uncalled for.
And Disposable Nickname, whether or not you like being called a rape apologist it's a "nickname" you should probably get used to as illustrated by your deleted posts. As a rape survivor you make me sick to my stomach.
This is the only reply I have that might not get deleted: I want you to think about the implications, both for yourself and the general discussion, that deleting civil but disagreeable posts will have.
This is the only reply I have that might not get deleted: I want you to think about the implications, both for yourself and the general discussion, that deleting civil but disagreeable posts will have.
It's not civil to be a rape apologist.
I don't think you understand the definition of "civil."
From the dictionary: marked by benevolence or adhering to the norms of polite social intercourse; not deficient in common courtesy. I don't think being a rape apologist falls into that category at all.
I think its perfectly possible to express an offensive sentiment calmly and courteously. Otherwise, anyone can say that anything they disagree with is uncivil. For example, if you calmly explain that you think abortion should be legal, there are a lot of people out there who would say its impossible to be civil while being a "baby-murderer." Its not a productive way to discuss anything.
I also do not think that discussing whether a particular, very gray situation is or is not rape qualifies as being a "rape-apologist." Its not apologizing for rape if it wasn't rape, and this case is by no means clear.
Did you read the part in another reply to you (a few down I believe) where I said Disposable Nickname said basically (I can't said it verbatim since the post is now gone) that once you choose to drink you are also then consenting to what you then do drunk? That is a rape apologist statement pure and simple. You'll never convince me otherwise.
I totally respect your right to disagree with Disposable Nickname's point of view. But branding them as a "rape apologist" for questioning whether a very grey situation is rape, and saying their posts should be deleted, is opening up a really bad can of worms.
Suppose I go to a pro-life discussion board, and I write a well-reasoned and calm post explaining why I think abortion should be legal. They say "you're a baby-killer and nothing will convince me otherwise" and delete my posts. So then, no one gets to read about the opposing viewpoint, no one gets to think about whether they agree or disagree, its just gone. Its completely unproductive-- you might as well just not have a discussion site in the first place.
I've seen some pro-life posts recently on this website that, even though they were polite and well written, offended me personally. I'm a woman and I'm offended and hurt when someone tells me that I should be forced to play host to an organism I don't want, I find that personally offensive. But I would never say that their posts should be deleted for that-- no one will learn anything that way.
Censoring posts for ambiguous content (as opposed to hostile yelling) is fine as long as you believe that the owners of the website are absolutely right about everything always, but if you admit they're human, its a big problem.
And as for this particular case, I don't think any of their posts were rape apologies, at least none that I managed to read before they disappeared. Saying that someone is responsible for their actions while voluntarily drunk (their actions, not the actions of others who try to do things to them) is not saying that rape is ok at all.
The 'opposing viewpoint' is all over the internet. Pro-life, pro-choice, it was rape, it wasn't rape, whatever other viewpoint- all over the internet. Professor Foxy isn't Big Brother, banishing all dissent from public discourse. It's a single discussion on a single website about a specific person with real feelings. Let's not pretend that this is an issue of Censorship with a capital C.
One: it's not that gray. Two: we weren't even there and have little to not details so stfu.
I see, we have no details so the assumptions you make about those details are ok, but other people should "shut the fuck up"? Who is being less civil here?
Hey, hey. I wrote "flashing her tits" not "showing her fucking tits."
They're tits. That's what they are. Would you rather have had me say "baring her bosoms" or is that still too much for you delicate sensibilities?
or maybe you could have some compassion for a woman that is dealing with a tough time.
I didn't know saying tits and being compassionate were mutually exclusive.
Argolis, your posts were extremely hostile. You could have expressed your points in a much better way, and I'm not at all surprised your posts were deleted.
However, I think Disposable Nickname's posts (at least the ones I saw before they disappeared) were calm and polite and made good points. I'm disappointed that Feministing has started deleting comments simply for disagreeing with the original post (and a post that asks a question in the title, even). If that keeps happening I'll have to find some other site for these interesting and important discussions.
Disposable Nicknames posts were the definition of a rape apologist and made me more mad than any of the other horrid posts on this thread. She/he basically said that once you choose to drink you're also consenting to anything that you do while drunk. That's horribly offensive and should not be tolerated on Feministing...a place that should be a safe space for rape survivors.
Please be more specific. What is it, exactly, that I have been saying that you find so bad?
Well I did not copy your posts down on a piece of paper so I cannot be more specific. But if you honestly have no idea what I'm talking about I just feel sorry for you.
Ok, here's a hypothetical for us to discuss:
A woman chooses to drink, without the influence of anyone else.
She get very drunk. She sexually pursues someone else, who may or may not be as drunk as she is. They have sex. They both regret it the next morning.
Is it rape? Is it sexual assault? Who assaulted whom?
Prof. Foxy, you probably shouldn't have titled this post the way you did. Her only real question was " how do i move on with my life? how do i stop thinking about this?"
The title invites heated discussion about what constitutes rape/assault. Which would be good if Time's story was a hypothetical.
To everyone posting: please think about Time and her original questions before commenting.
None of them were real questions. The intent of these posts is not discussion, it is solidarity.
Oh, so she wasn't really asking for advice on how to move past the incident to a healthier place? How on earth do you know that?
Because the answers we are permitted to give became very clear. Unless people are willing to consider the entire line of questioning behind the material issues that led to the mental ones, it's not a real question. A real question does not include an edict of "But don't pursue the subject into an area I might find uncomfortable". In that case, you don't have someone looking for answers, you have someone looking for compassion.
She actually does ask in the letter "was I assaulted?" but I agree it was a bad idea to make that the title if we weren't supposed to discuss it.
i think we can all pretty much agree that rape is bad. but sometimes, especially since we grew up in a victim blaming culture it can be confusing for some people (even me sometimes) to figure out what constitutes as rape or who is the victim (or maybe if there are two victims)... but i think this blog exists to hold these kind of conversations, and maybe deleting people's comments or swearing never to come back to the blog isn't the best way to have these conversations and educate each other. i came in the conversation too late to read the comments that were deleted but i seriously think that we can be having more mature arguments, on both sides.
The comment I was replying to disappeared while I was composing my reply!
Indeed the writer asked "was it assault?" but it was in the context of describing how she's felt in the past few months of dealing with the fallout from this incident. I think if you'll re-read what she wrote, you'll see that she wasn't really asking for a legal opinion. She was describing self-questioning, self-doubt, obsessive thoughts and a lot of emotional turmoil from this incident. These were questions that were running through her own mind as she has been attempting to process what has happened.
I think commenters in this thread have gotten distracted by the "was it assault" question and are missing the point of both the writer's question and Prof. Foxy's reply.
In answering in the affirmative to the "assault" question, Prof. Foxy was offering affirmation and support. This is what counselors do in order to establish rapport with clients. Prof. Foxy wasn't offering a legal opinion that anyone else had to dispute.
Here's a thought experiment: if everyone offering comments in this thread decided unanimously that what the writer described was an assault by this man, do you think the writer's feelings and obsessive thoughts would just magically go away? That she'd suddenly feel better? That everything with her social circle would suddenly be fine?
Myself and others here are trying to focus on what's really going on with this young woman and give her support for her feelings and guide her towards counseling, not provide a legal answer to a question that was asked rhetorically.
i think that questioning whether or not this is rape is completely ridiculous. the fact of the matter is, the writer feels confusion and is unable to lead a healthy sex life after this has taken place. and who are we to say how she should feel about the incident? clearly it has affected her negatively so let's focus on providing support rather than being judgmental.
i see some posters who are pushing for legal action, but that is not always the best next step. it is important for anyone who is reporting a sexual assault case to know that the police can be hostile to survivors and very demeaning (not to say that ALL are, but the likelihood is relatively high)...and then everything that follows that report can be emotionally trying as well. survivors who decide to go this route should be prepared to have their sexual history scrutinized, to tell their story a zillion times in front of strangers and subsequently have it ripped apart, and to possibly not get the justice that they deserve after all is said and done.
that being said, i think there are other options for survivors who can't (or won't) go the legal route...counseling is a great option. joining a support group. doing writing, dancing, singing, painting, knitting (something artsy or crafty) some sex toy stores have workshops like "sex for survivors" which are great. becoming part of some anti-violence campaign (was very healing for me) etc.
i think you are very brave for posting your story on a public site...thank you for sharing it with us and i am sorry that there are posters who find it more important to argue over how they think you should feel about this situation than actually trying to help you solve the issues that you presented. i hope that you can find peace within yourself and find support, love, and understanding from people around you. i went through a similar situation where all of our mutual friends decided to side with HIM. it was hard but i made it through and am happy that im not friends with those idiots anyways!
(and sorry for this novel of a post...)
"and who are we to say how she should feel about the incident? clearly it has affected her negatively so let's focus on providing support rather than being judgmental."
THANK YOU! As long as she feels the emotions that she was assaulted, it doesnt matter what 'legally' happened, she still needs the same support as any victim would recieve.
I think that supporting a friend needs to be a two-prong effort. On the one hand, you do want to make them feel supported and cared about.
But, sometimes, we feel hurt by a situation for which we aren't entirely blameless. I think that a good friend can also realize this, and help us keep grounded in the fact that we are sometimes not purely victims of circumstance.
That's all well and good if we were talking about someone drinking and getting behind the wheel of a car.
You are taking the exact same stance that if a woman wears a short skirt, she clearly wants it, and if she happens to be attacked then it was her fault.
She clearly states that she was pushed into drinking in the first place and therefor was not able to consent.
What should her friends be saying to her then, according to you? "Yea, that sucked, but you know it was your fault for drinking anyway."
You seem to be saying that purposely getting behind the wheel of a car while drunk is the same as someone grabbing you when you're drunk and shoving you into the driver's seat.
No, her friends shouldn't brush her off at all. They should be offering plenty of love and support and telling her that they're her friends. However, as the immediate sadness fades, I think it's important to start really looking at the issues that led to the unfortunate incident. And I think that a good friend will provide you with honest feedback. I'm not going to go any further here, as I suspect it'll get my post deleted.
"You are taking the exact same stance that if a woman wears a short skirt, she clearly wants it, and if she happens to be attacked then it was her fault."
No. Not one bit. That is a completely different situation. On the one hand, your example describes someone who is physically forced into sex. On the other, you have someone who chooses to drink, and then regrets something they had an active role in while drunk. I simply do not think they are comparable.
No one said she was purely a victim of circumstance. Do you really think she doesn't feel bad about what happened and wishes that she hadn't drank to excess? I can guarantee that she wishes she hadn't.
But because she chose to do so, that doesn't give you or anyone else the right be a moral scold about it and "tsk tsk." That quite literally produces no positive benefit and may only deepen her anxiety and bad feelings. It may make her feel shamed (which she should not feel) or hesitant about confronting the situation. It may make other people who have had similar experiences less likely to speak up, if they're afraid that they'll be subjected to an emotional battering after a physical assault.
Sexual contact without consent is assault. Someone that is too intoxicated to be in full possession of their mental and physical faculties is unable to give consent. Was this a violent assault? Most likely not. But that doesn't mean that we should give the assaulter brownie points for not using physical force to take advantage of someone.
It might be a good idea to ask ourselves how we'd feel if the genders were reversed. A man was pressured by a female friend to drink. He finally gave in, got drunk, exposed himself, performed oral sex on the woman, and can't remember anything else. Was he assaulted?
We need to make sure the answer is the same regardless of the gender of the parties involved.
Yes it would be the same. Why wouldn't it? Because we're all supposed to be man-haters?
Because usually when a man exposes himself to a woman without invitation its considered a sexual assault in itself. Men are often arrested for that.
Now, I don't think a woman exposing her breasts is the same thing, but why isn't it? Becuase breasts aren't really genitals? So would it be considered an assault if a woman flashed her vagina at a man? Maybe it would, I can't think of any cases at the moment of that happening.
In this case though, Time made it sound (and I could be wrong) that the guy and her were being drunk and flirtatious and that he wanted her to flash, it was part of the flirtation and foreplay. So if that was the case and the genders were just completely reversed I wouldn't see that as sexual assault at all.
The situation of a man (or woman) running around the streets flashing people at random is completely different.
I don't think you can have it both ways... either they were both flirting and participating in what was happening, or they weren't. If they weren't consensually flirting, then the person initiating things is the one committing an assault. If they were both participating and enjoying it, then it wasn't assault.
The alcohol makes things different. If she would have done the same thing completely sober I would agree with you. But once alcohol is basically pushed onto her (and I think we're all completely undermining the harsh effects of peer pressure here as well) that changes the circumstances.
And I'm not going to tell her whether she was assaulted or not. It's not for me to say. I wasn't there. I don't know the whole situation. What's important is how this situation has effected her. She's having the same problems as someone who has been raped or assaulted so it's important for her to get the help she needs.
Yes, she certainly deserves help and support. But that doesn't mean the guy automatically deserves jail, which is the implication of deciding it was assault.
As I've said, I don't think her friends are treating her fairly at all-- and if the original post had only asked questions about how to deal with her feelings and her friends, I'd be 100% on her side. But it asks if it was assault, and I think its fair to discuss that question and I think its enough of a gray situation that its fair for people to have different opinions.
i dont think by saying that it was assault that it automatically means anything in terms of legal repercussions for the dude. i think it is more about validating this woman's experience and helping her come to terms with what happened and moving past it so she can lead a healthy life.
Well, saying it was assault DOES mean the guy was to blame and deserves punishment. That's what the word assault means. Its not about validating her experience, its about what HE DID. If you say it was assault, you are saying he committed assault, ergo deserves punishment for committing assault.
If you want to say that its perfectly valid for her to feel like she's been taken advantage of, etc, then say that. I agree. She had a bad experience and its totally understandable for her to feel bad about it on a lot of different levels, given how everyone is reacting. She deserves support and I hope she can heal and find some friends who are more trustworthy.
But if you say it was assault you are no longer talking about her experience, you are talking about the actions of the assaulter.
Uhhh yeah saying that a guy assaulted someone or is a rapist DEFINITELY means that he should be punished for his actions.
It's not like we're talking about breaking hearts or being rude to others or playing harmless pranks. Assault is serious.
I think the issue is not that they were flirting with each other earlier in the night. A person can flirt and consent to kissing or anything else but then NOT consent to sex or other acts later in the night. And the thing to remember about consent is that it should be the enthusiastic consent of someone wanting to engage in the activity. It is not enough to think that as long as a person doesn't say 'no' it is ok to engage in the activity. And if the person is too drunk to even remember what happened, I think it is safe to say that she is not capable of giving consent.
Since polite responses are now being deleted, I can't answer this comment. But don't think that means I didn't have more to say.
And I should note that yes, obviously, flirting does not mean you're consenting to anyone else. My response that was deleted simply explained that I had never claimed that; I was discussing the flirting and flashing because other people were talking about who made the first sexual advance.
I also said something about how I did not say that flirting constitutes consent for oral sex, but that actually consenting to oral sex constitutes consent for oral sex. But I guess that's not allowed and this post might disappear too.
General suggestion for Feministing moderators: When you delete posts, you should put something like "post deleted" rather than just having it disappear. Its really confusing to read the comments thread when replies are left but the post they were replying to is gone. Or else, you should delete all the replies as well.
Wow. This is an awful situation and you have terrible friends. I'm sorry that people feel the need to always blame the other woman. The cheating wasn't you fault -- you cheated because you were very drunk, and you were drunk because your "friend" coerced you into drinking.
This was almost certainly assault. I can think of exactly one scenario in which this might not be assault, and it sounds pretty unlikely. You certainly feel violated, and that's affecting your life. Try counseling or therapy if you can afford it. If you can't, you might be able to find some place that offers it free or very cheap. Find some friends -- not the ones who are victim-blaming you -- and talk to them about it.
Take a pregnancy test unless you were already on birth control, and get an STI screening as well. You don't remember everything you did and you should play it safe.
I have to start off by saying that I do agree that this was assault and that there is no excuse for what he did. Can you smell the but coming?
Many posters keep talking about her "friends" and how they should have stepped in to stop her from doing this. I don't disagree, and especially that it's a pretty shitty friend who continues to harass you to drink when you have already told him that you don't drink because you lose control when you do. (here comes the but)
But, do you know who my best friend is? Me. I tell myself not to drink because I don't want to lose control. Anyone else who tells me different is not a very good friend. Again, don't take this as excusing what happened once she had been drinking, but it bothers me that the topic of personal responsibility had not come up. Nobody dragged her to this party against her will. Nobody forced drinks down her throat. She made those decisions, granted under peer pressure, of her own free will. If someone gives you a revolver with one bullet in it, spins the chamber, and bugs you to put it to your head and pull the trigger do we put all of the blame on the person who loaded the gun? No, they suck and should be blamed too, but it's not very smart of you to pull the trigger either.
It's a pretty cliche line, but "Just Say No" works in this situation just fine.
Now, that being said, all of the other advice about getting help and support to cope with the assault is very good advice and I feel horrible to hear what happened to you. I hope that people don't think that I'm a "rape apologist" because I think what he did was deplorable and even worse because he obviously planned this in advance and wanted this to happen.
"Nobody dragged her to this party against her will. Nobody forced drinks down her throat. She made those decisions, granted under peer pressure, of her own free will."
While peer pressure may not have a very strong effect against you, it's hard to judge how Time reacted against the pressure she was feeling at the party. With her 'friends' all against her trying to stay sober, it can certainly be said that she would have a harder time to stick to her guns about not drinking than you would have.
It's great to see that you would be able to 'just say no' while in the same situation, but you also shouldn't make the judgment that it was as easy for her to make the same choice.
I experienced a date rape a couple of years ago and before I even realized that I had been raped, I was experiencing some sexual side-effects from the trauma. Sex was very painful. Luckily, my boyfriend (who is not my rapist) understood that I was experiencing pain and we worked through it together. After about 6 months (and right around the time that I started to realize that I had, indeed, been raped) the pain-with-penetration suddenly, almost magically went away. I don't know why or how, and I don't know if coming to terms with what had happened changed how my body felt about sex, or if my boyfriend's love and understanding (and slowing down or pulling back when I said "ow") changed how my body felt about sex... but the physical side-effects from my assault did eventually go away and I did eventually stop reacting to everything like I was re-living the experience.
There is hope. You just need a really good support system and to be really open and honest with your sex partner (even if that's just yourself) about your physical limitations. I think that realizing that not all people we have sex with are at all like the person who assaulted us is a big part of sexual healing.
thanks
Im sorry this happened to you. I think you need to stand up for yourself, and not let this GIRLFRIEND and guy tell YOU what happened to you.
You told the guy you couldnt control yourself. He obviously wanted to get you in this mind-set. Im also concerned that he wanted you to take a pregnancy test. He remembers parts of the night that you do not, this is just really F*cked up. I could only imagine how vulnerable and humiliated you feel. It seems like everyone knows what happened except you. I think you should stay strong, tell that guy to fuck off, tell him that HE raped YOU and he KNOWS it. None of this is your fault, nothing. You know he knows it no matter how much he tries to lie to himself. In the future, I wouldnt reccommend drinking around people you dont completely trust, or around guys who want you to lose control. You deserve more than that kind of negative attention.
I can't believe my comment was deleted, and many of the other thoughtful, non-troll ones that were simply asking questions and critiquing the "Yes it was assault" response. I was very careful in my comment to be clear that I don't think it was TIME's fault (not victim-blaming), I was just questioning the malicious intent of the guy and addressing the gray area of consent while intoxicated.
And as another poster has said, you were wrong to title this: "Was I assaulted?" if you didn't want some analysis of the topic (besides those that agree with you, that is).
The message I'm getting from this is that feminists must always blame the man (which is a horrible message to send). I'm hearing that only men are capable of committing rape, and questioning this= victim-blaming.
I agree. I thought we were having a nice civil discussion with well reasoned and interesting posts (with the exception of a couple all-caps posts). I am far more offended by the idea that posts are being deleted simply for answering the question posted in the title than I was by people disagreeing in the first place.
This is kind of a gray area I think... you were drinking and people make bad decisions when they're drunk. :|
That said, your friends suck. If I was out with my friends, and one of them got drunk and was flashing people, I'd take her home. Friends look out for each other. The guy is also a douchebag, but you know that.
it sickens me how much all of you are debating whether or not a woman was raped while she is who knows where reading your debate! do you have any idea how much your commments - positive and negative - impact a victim/survivor of sexual violence? do you have any idea of how much your advice - positive and negative - impacts a victim/survivor of sexual violence? but most of all, i cannot believe the nerve of people who would actually comment after her post, arguing with people who affirm her assault, and BLAME THIS WOMAN for her and all the world to see...
listen to, support, and affirm her. who the hell are you people?
strangers. we are strangers. we don't know this woman who wrote the letter. most of us don't know each other.
and i hope that in the future, anyone who writes a Prof Foxy letter about a sensitive subject understands that his or her problem will be discussed by complete strangers on a bulletin board that is designed specifically for that purpose.
while slut-shaming and automatic woman-blaming are clearly out of line, the letter IS entitled "was i sexually assaulted?", which clearly motivated readers to ponder this very question.
as a survivor of THREE different attempted sexual assaults, i can certainly agree that time should be treated with sensitivity, but as a person visiting a feminist website specifically because of the interesting discussion that it raises, i don't see the point of refraining from discussing the ethical and moral questions raised by the letter.
I think comments on this specific post should be disabled. No one on Feministing cares about this poor woman, they just want to fight with each other.
This is absolutely not true for most of the posters.
May I point out that this was published publicly? If Prof. Foxy thought it was too sensitive to discuss publicly, perhaps she shouldn't have published it on a popular blog, but instead answered her privately.
Miriam posted something publicly on the main page of Feministing earlier this week and disabled the comments and none of you went ape shit over it.
And not just Prof Foxy, but the original letter writer, who wrote this in intending it to be published publicly, knowing comments would be forthcoming from others. Maybe the letter writer wanted to hear other perspectives? Personally based on past Prof Foxy comment threads, if I wrote a letter to her I'd be just as interested to see what comments it got as to see Prof Foxy's response. I've found a lot of her advice lacking, but the details from people who've had similar experiences or different perspectives really add a lot to it.
Advice columns are published every day that don't give you a way to respond to them, and you aren't going ape shit over those either.
The letter writer could also have written in to one of those, if they didn't want to read other perspectives. This site is very comment oriented.
Also, its one thing to disable comments from the start, its another to shut down an existing polite discussion because you don't agree with some of the posters.
I'm not going apeshit over anything, thank you very much. Here's how I see this.
Time has a horrible experience, wants to move on. Decides to write Prof. Foxy about it, knowing full well this will not be private advice. Prof. Foxy posts it publicly with the title, "Was I Assaulted?" Time's story and the question in the title spark debate. Some commenting are rude and completely insensitive, but most are analyzing the situation from their own perspective and posting it thoughtfully. All dissenting comments are deleted, and anyone who posted them is derided as anti-woman, anti-feminist, and/or a rape apologist. We suggest that if discussion wasn't welcome, perhaps another approach to her situation would have been wiser.
Who, exactly, is going apeshit?
I think "Is this assault" is the wrong question to ask.
The right question is "Why would you coerce someone into drinking?"
I cannot think of a single answer that does not involve malicious intent. Even hardcore partyers don't think that if one person doesn't drink the party will be ruined. Sure, drinking is fun, but if I gave that reason to a friend, and s/he still said no, I would take the no. If the guy couldn't take no for an answer on the alcohol, it is likely because he had an agenda.
Maybe instead of asking "Why would you coerce someone into drinking?", we should be discussing the effects of bullying and peer pressure on decision making.
Time said that her the guy had been had been "harassing" her about drinking for a while, and apparently she had no support from her friends about that. IMO, the bullying interfered with her ability to consent both to drinking and to what happened afterward.
I disagree in a big way.
I know many, many people who are partiers and encourage people to drink so the they loosen up, become uninhibited, get silly and loud, dance, get the party going. They want everyone to have fun. That single sober person in the room makes them anxious. That person is a giant wet blanket, they might be judging everyone else, etc.
I've all sort so people, male and female, do this. Is it healthy? No, not really, but it's not malicious.
It's one thing to be an enthusiastic host. It's quite another to keep pressuring someone to drink after they've told you that they have a problem with alcohol.
My thoughts exactly.
Eh..I don't know. I have seen people badger others about drinking because of malicious and predatory intent (they want to get them drunk because they think it will affect their judgment enough that they will have sex with them) but I have also seen people try to get others to drink simply because they are drinking and don't want to look the drunk fool in front of sober people or think drinking will "liven somebody up", make them more outgoing, or relax them. I'm not saying that pressuring people to drink is ok or ever motivated from anything more than a selfish view point but it doesn't always have to be malicious in intent.
I'm glad you wrote in to Prof Foxy. Something similar happened to me years ago with a bartender and I have lived with guilt and shame ever since. I know some would call what happened to me an assault, and I know others would not. I just know I felt like shit then and I should have sought help a long time ago for it.
Does the woman who asked the initial question know if she was given any sort of drug without her knowledge? This reminds me of an incident that happened to me when I was about nineteen and a supposed friend of my boyfriend's came over and while we were waiting for my boyfriend to come home this friend and I had a couple of beers. Next thing I remember he was on top of me and I was crying because the past two hours were gone and I didn't know what had happened. I was so ashamed that I couldn't tell my boyfriend and years later after we'd broken up he told me that this friend of his had confessed one night to drugging me and raping me. This woman's story seems eerily similar and I'm wondering if maybe this guy slipped her something without her knowledge. If he went so far as to badger her and seemed to have it planned, is it beyond the realm of possible that he may have drugged her as well, which would account for some of her memory loss?
I think deleting my post was out of line. I am not a rape apologist so I don't know why mine got deleted. I was bringing up the issues of personal responsibility and "friends" being horrible to you by not stopping that before it happened.
I also mentioned a counselor. Apparently that's not welcome here? I'm an active member of Feministing, not a fucking troll.
Welcome to the club. I'm getting really sick of the hate some people have for fellow women, feminists and human beings who have a slightly different perspective than they do.
inb4 a REAL feminist would agree with me!!!11!
Yeah... mine was removed too. I didn't even present a dissenting opinion. I stated that victim blaming is NEVER okay but that I hope young women will make discerning and savvy choices. And I wasn't even specifically referring to "Time." I don't think that warranted removal especially considering some comments I've seen stay up.
"I stated that victim blaming is NEVER okay but that I hope young women will make discerning and savvy choices."
And you don't see the inconsistency???
Of course I see inconsistency! And hypocrisy, and unfairness.
Everyone takes measures to protect themselves from every manner of violation, however Being alert and educated just makes sense.
Exactly. Drinking enough so that you black out is dangerous FOR EVERYBODY and raises the potential of harm, not just in terms of sexual assault, but assault in general, reckless driving and general injury.
What someone else DOES to you while you are in that state and cannot give consent or be fully aware is THAT PERSON'S action and his (or her) responsibility.
Was "Time" assaulted? I would say Yes. Is it her fault because she drank? No.
Should people in general probably avoid situations where they are out of control and cannot give consent? Yes--Not because they "deserve" or "chose" what happened to them, but because it is an inherently unsafe state of being.
I think this is what posters have been getting at, and calling them "rape apologists" is unfair.
Time,
Assuming you can even stomach most of these comments I want to say that it is irrelevant, completely and totally irrelevant whether or not legally this was rape, whether he could be held legally responsible, or the policy implications of alcohol and rape.
I hope you don't spend more than two seconds right now thinking or listening to those conversations. Sometimes people sit behind their computer screens and ponder things without realizing that actual human beings are involved and are hurting.
It sounds like that it feels like sexual assault to you in that you're experiencing some of the symptoms that other rape survivors experience. In this moment, what is important is providing you with the help and support you need to feel okay again. Period.
Please ignore the academic and ethical debates we're having here and go talk to someone. It will help. Promise.
I just want to say that even though I made an argument below for the whole "personal responsibility for actions while drunk" side on a theoretical/ethical level, I COMPLETELY AGREE with this idea.
Something happened that was painful for you. Whether or not someone else is to blame, your feelings about the event are valid, you do not deserve to suffer for it, and you have every right to expect your friends to be more compassionate towards you afterwards.
I think you're right in that we (and Time) can't really tell if what happened to her was assault. And in some ways that makes it worse. He was drunk, so was she, no one was capable of consenting or making aware decisions, there's no way to tell who did what to whom and how the other person felt about it at the time. All that's left is how she feels about it NOW, and I think the really important thing is to focus on *that* as valid.
We CAN tell, though, that the 'friend' who pressured her to drink and the 'friends' who are shaming her are all complete assholes.
I agree.
I sympathize with Time because her "friends" were complete jerks, the guy was an asshat for harrassing her to drink and his GF was WAY out of line. This guy bullied and possibly did it to see if he could get in her pants, but the reason she chose to drink doesn't nullify her subsequent will or actions. *Why* she drank has nothing to do with the choices she made (i.e. flash him, give him a BJ). She doesn't say or even suggest that the sexual activity was coerced or otherwise against her will, and I fail to see how treating it as though it were an assault (i.e. attend support group) will actually help her.
If my best friend were in that situation, I would definitely sympathize but I would also help her work through the guilt she would feel for getting drunk and cheating on her BF. Sure, she deserves to be mad at this guy for urging her to drink & possibly worse, but I think she needs to be true to herself, own up to her vulnerability to booze and try to figure out why some part of her gave herself permission to flash & give this guy a BJ. Maybe she'll decide she was looking for an out in her relationship. Maybe she'll realize that she really loves him and and she wants to try to work things out. Maybe they were in a rough patch and she vented her frustrations inappropriately. Maybe she's just a very sexual person and she needs to only be around trusted friends when she's drunk. IMO, Time is not going to get over the sexual discomfort she is experiencing until she holds herself accountable for HER contribution to the situation. I hope she has a good friend or family member who can help her work through it.
I cant really comment on the assault bc I dont know what happened but it bothers me that people are speculating about this guy and saying he forced her to drink so he could have sex with her.
my usual disclaimer when I comment on issues like this, which I state to show I have an academic/research based understanding of sexual offenders and sexual assaults:
1)I worked at a Probation and Parole Office and interacted with sexual offenders, as well as was tasked with reviewing their offender files for use in evaluating the effectiveness of the Department of Corrections polygraph program. I probably reviewed about 80 offenders files in depth.
2) I also was a research assistant at my University on a epidemiological study of sexual assaults in my city. I read over 800 police reports and 1400 sexual assault dyads.
The guys behavior is classic sexual offender. He is manipulative to the highest degree and was basically able to pull off the highest achievement of manipulation: he got the victim to blame herself.
He was also able to convince his girlfriend that even though he pressured Time into drinking and he was a willing participant, he was the victim.
The dude is a snake in human form.
Further that, his use of alcohol was to his advantage. He wanted to have sex and used alcohol to facilitate his desires.
He got everything he wanted.
Of course the guy is an asshole for pressuring her to drink. But that doesnt mean he had an "agenda" to maker her drink so he could have sex with her. Lets for a moment take gender out of the equation..if my SO came home and told me he cheated on me bc this girl was "badgering" him to drink all nite, and he gave in so he would not seem "boring" and that all he remembers is taking his shirt off for her and then giving her oral sex..well I would say I could nto know if it was consensual or not..but I do know even though the girl was a jerk for pressuring him, he barely knew her so why give into her pressuring him???
Re: the idea that it was HIS fault she got drunk, and that her friends should not let her do things she'll regret
This is an issue that I struggle with. On the one hand- I try to assertively express my agency and power. I am a grown-ass woman, and I make my own choices about what happens in my life. I don't need anyone else to take care of me or make my decisions for me.
And yet on the other hand, there are always circumstances that we can't control, and other people who act upon us, and these things are obviously not our responsibility or our fault.
But when it comes to our actions while drunk? Where does this issue fall between these two ends of the spectrum? Is it up to other people to prevent us from doing things that they know we will regret? Sure it's nice of them if they stop us, but is it their responsibility? And what if everyone else is drunk too? Can I just count on the fact that someone else will protect me from making bad decisions?
I am NOT talking about actions that other people make upon me, e.g., if I am unconscious, or if I am awake and passively allow something to happen, I have no question that this is not my fault. I am talking about actions that I myself initiate.
I personally think that things I do while drunk are my responsibility. However, I think we can still be compassionate and supportive of people who make bad judgment calls. Especially if the person is not experienced with drinking, or didn't understand the situation they were in, etc. If someone makes a mistake, it doesn't mean they deserve what happens to them, or they "should have known" what would happen. They are still feeling pain and regret, and good friends should offer caring support for that. But, that doesn't mean that it has to be someone else's fault.
(This does not necessarily apply to Time's story, because as discussed before, we don't know how much she initiated things. But it could apply, depending on how things happened)
This is why I add my disclaimer...
The guy expresses classic sexual offender (SO) behaviors. Sexual offenders come in two basic (simplified) types, manipulative and physically forceful.
This guy appears to be completely manipulative. Some SO will manipulate their victims into a place where they can be violent, but not this one.
He manipulated Time, was able to get herself to blame herself, then was able to manipulate his GF into seeing him as the victim.
The use of polygraph examinations to supplement sex offender treatment and post conviction supervision was created for people like the instant offender.
He is living a life based on lies over lies and probably only views whats 'truthful' with whats 'self-serving'
Its the whole "like a pig" line of reasoning...
If it smells like a pig, looks like a pig, squeals like a pig... its most likely a pig.
If he acted like a florid sexual predator, he most likely is a sexual predator.
While I completely understand this feeling :"it sickens me how much all of you are debating whether or not a woman was raped while she is who knows where reading your debate!", I also wonder why this is posted online and why it's titled "Was I assaulted?" if people aren't expected to discuss it. Honestly, I commend the OP for putting her story out there, but you can't expect there to be one unanimous response from an open question. I don't think people should be unnecessarily hurtful, but there are people out there who would say she wasn't assaulted (I'm NOT one of them, but that's irrelevant), and there's no reason they shouldn't respond to a public debate. If this was intended to be discussed privately, it should have been kept private.
If dissenting opinions that are expressed politely are not welcome, you should probably just disable the comments.
I though Prf. Foxy's advice was right on.
I think the biggest issue here was the reaction of the OP's "friends" who blamed and further victimized OP after the fact. The whole situation reflects the unfair and sexist attitude in our culture that women are ultimately responsible for the sexual behavior of men, hence the OP becoming a "slut" in their eyes and the manipulative boy becoming the "victim." Total and utter bullshit.
I would recommend that in addition to seeking support from groups like RAIN the OP check out Alcoholics Anonymous. There she could find a group of people who understand alcohol addiction. It's easy for people who don't know what it's like to blame one for not have better self-control. Also, the OP would greatly benefit from a group that supported her commitment to sobriety and her health rather than her old "friends" who mocked her for it.
That's the problem I have with the "this was rape, pure and simple" crowd. That makes him a rapist. An assaulter. And we don't know enough about the situation to make that kind of statement. He sure seems like a douchebag, but that's all we can glean from her story.
She was too drunk to consent. But, possibly, so was he. It's a two way street--we can't say that if a woman is drunk she can't consent and also say that when a man is drunk he is not only capable of consent but of manipulation and sexual assault.
At the worst, he premeditated the whole thing and he's a rapist. At the best, they were both too drunk and they made a mistake. We all make them.
I think we need to be careful about making snap judgments about these things.
"or perhaps she raped him. But, I see no evidence that he raped her."
Where is the evidence that she raped him?
I didn't mean to imply that she did, in fact, rape him. Just that she might have. To answer your question though, there is no evidence for it.
This column reminds me of a guy I know who, when we're all drinking, is always pressuring people to drink more, drink more. Not really understanding, for some reason, that a person who is pushing 30 probably has been around the drunkenness bend and has a good reason for not wanting to drink more (beyond "I'm afraid I'll get in trouble with my Mom" or something like that). Now that I think about it, he only pressures girls to drink more. Creepy. Think I'll call him out on it next time.
You're ignoring the repeated, unrelenting nature of how this woman was coerced into drinking. I can't tell from what she describes who actually initiated the sexual acts that occurred, so it's hard for me to make a definitive judgment on whether she was assaulted. It's possible that the guy really did end up feeling violated.
BUT: It's clear that the guy coerced her into drinking. Women are socialized to not say "no" to people, and when someone badgers you to the point where you know they won't shut up unless you give in, your giving in is not true consent. Coercing someone into drinking is ABSOLUTELY a violation, and the fact that this guy coerced her into drinking and then was involved in sex acts with her suggests pretty strongly that he got her to drink in order to get in her pants.
Look, what you and DisposableName are missing is that she DIDN'T consent to drinking. This guy repeatedly badgered her into it, to the point where drinking was probably the only way she could think of to shut him up. Coercion nullifies apparent consent.