http://web.blogads.com/advertise/liberal_blog_advertising_network
Liberal Prose BlogAds Network
Ask Professor Foxy: Is Faking Always Anti-Feminist?

This weekly Saturday column "Ask Professor Foxy" will regularly contain sexually explicit material. This material is likely not safe for work viewing. The title of the column will include the major topic of the post, so please read the topic when deciding whether or not to read the entire column.

Dear Professor Foxy
I have seen a lot of feminist commentary that suggests "faking it" in bed is one of the most inherently anti-feminist acts a woman can do. Faking it is wrong, it is selling yourself short, it is depriving you of your right to a real orgasm and giving in to the perception that men shouldn't ever feel emasculated.

I've faked it before, and I'll do it again. And I guess for clarity's sake I'll explain what I mean by faking. I'm talking just about orgasms. Not faking the whole act, not moaning and groaning when secretly I hate or am uninterested in what's going on. I'm only talking about the occasions where both he and I have put in a good long effort trying to get me to cum, and then eventually getting to a point where I realize it's not going to happen, so I throw in a couple orgasmic cries or grunts or whatever so that he thinks I'm "done." With past boyfriends, I've faked it a lot more often than I do now. One of my exes probably thinks I came every time we had sex when in reality I probably only came twice in the year we dated.

And I refuse to be like that anymore. I've learned that communication in sex is more important than lying, or else I just won't want sex. And this current boyfriend is different. Most of the time, for one thing, I do cum when we fool around; we have a very strong sexual chemistry. But sometimes I don't have orgasms, and I know that's just a part of life, it doesn't bother me. And in fact, my boyfriend understands that. He knows sometimes it just ain't gonna happen and that doesn't mean the sex was bad or that he failed me or that I didn't enjoy it. Sex is about the process for me, not the result, and orgasms are just the icing on the cake. I love that my new boyfriend understands that. So most of the time, when I don't cum, I just say "OK, it's not gonna happen," he accepts it. Which, of course, makes it even easier for me to actually cum! I love our no-stress sex life.

But every once in awhile, I still fake it. Usually because I can sense something in him that cares a little more than usual. I just mean that sometimes you just lie a little to make someone else feel good. Is that really so wrong?

I know a lot of feminists generally abhor faking orgasms--I've certainly seen lots of comments that would suggest it on this website alone--but I really don't see how wanting my partner to feel good has anything to do with patriarchy. It has to do with my love for him. It's not about submitting or feeling unworthy of sexual pleasure; if it was about that, I would fake it every time I don't cum, and I really only do it very rarely. I don't think I have to cum or that there's anything wrong with me for not cumming. It's just about the particular moment, the particular feeling, the particular situation that is generally more complicated and invested with emotion than most commentary that says "faking it is bad!" can express. And basically what I want to know, is why others insist on making me feel guilty about it? Should I be?

Sincerely,
Proud Woman


Hi Proud Woman -
One thing that has been confirmed for me since beginning this column is that there is no monolithic feminist thought. It has been quite lovely.

This feminist is ok with the occasional faking. Our partners, regardless of gender, have egos. And many people have the desire to keep their partner's ego intact. However, we cannot divorce this from the fact that women are socialized to please, to make sure that everyone else is comfortable and happy, and that often women will do these things at the expense of their own happiness (and orgasm). Men and women do a lot of things to make their partners feel loved and supported. I think we all need to find our own line between taking care of our partners and losing ourselves in the socialized desire to please.

But there are some pretty large caveats to faking, even occasional faking. You seem like you have moved to a good place with sex, which means, for you, occasionally faking and a lot of honesty. The larger issue is that many, many women fake often and without thought, this is not a good thing. Consistent faking arises from a combination of factors: the aforementioned need to please, a fear of asking for what we want sexually lest we be judged, how regularly women judge and censor themselves, a lack of knowledge of our bodies and a fear of exploring them. I am ok with faking if you have thoroughly dealt with all of these things.

One of the most frequent questions I get asked by women is "why have I never had an orgasm?" My first response is always "do you masturbate?" How can we expect our partners to please us if we do not even know how to please ourselves?

And in these cases as you said "Faking it is wrong, it is selling yourself short, it is depriving you of your right to a real orgasm and giving in to the perception that men shouldn't ever feel emasculated."

The last part I want to address is people trying to make you feel guilty. Only you control your feelings, others can't make you feel things. If you don't feel guilty, no issue. If you do feel guilty, examine it.

As always, if you have a question for me, please send it to professorfoxy@feministing.com. Thanks!

Posted by Professor Foxy - April 11, 2009, at 12:44PM | in Anti-Feminism , Ask Professor Foxy

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Ask Professor Foxy: Is Faking Always Anti-Feminist?.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.feministing.com/cgi-bin/movabletype/mt-tb.fcgi/13022

100 Comments

[0+] Author Profile Page Peter said:

Professor Foxy sez:

The last part I want to address is people trying to make you feel guilty. Only you control your feelings, others can't make you feel things. If you don't feel guilty, no issue. If you do feel guilty, examine it.

Do you truly believe this -- namely that no one (fellow feminists or not) can make you feel guilty? Does anyone truly believe that "only you control your feelings"? (Hey, you! Stop feeling so sad, depressed, angry, aroused, afraid, and/or jealous!) And if someone does "make me" feel guilty about something, do we really want to say that I am either in charge or responsible for that guilt?

Doesn't sound human, much less feminist.

But on the main topic, maybe we can admit that all sex, at all moments -- organismic or not -- involves a lot of faking and acting. Indeed, sometimes the acting creates the reality. Where'd we get this idea that sex is this area of pure authenticity?

And last, I think that "Proud Woman"'s comment turns an uncomfortable spotlight on the orgasm-centered nature of a lot of comments on Feministing.

While the fight-for-your-right-to-cum rhetoric may sound empowering, it can also become yet one more benchmark by which a person measures her own shortcomings. We should take PW's concerns seriously.

(And, yes, I've faked it.)

[0+] Author Profile Page anonymous_coward replied to Peter :

I agree that sex isn't at all about pure authenticity. However, as a participant in sex, I would like to think that some parts of it are authentic. Like, is my partner enjoying this? The question is more about what level of authenticity is appropriate/required in a given relationship? What do both parties need and want to be authentic? I don't think it's fair to expect that nothing has to be authentic because sex is about "acting".

Your point about orgasms being used to measure self worth is very good. I think that's a very good pro-faking argument in that sometimes faking it can be empowering.

[0+] Author Profile Page anonymous_coward said:

I think faking is a pretty complicated issue with no easy answers. I generally fall into the not faking it camp. There are a couple of things about this question that stood out to me though:

PW explains her rationale of faking it to protect the ego of her partner. Both of them have apparently discussed the issue of not always having orgasms and the partner understands that this is reality. However, PW feels that there are certain times where the partner would feel better about a fake than a give up?

I would submit that this line of reasoning doesn't make a lot of sense to me, particularly if there is an established discussion and trust about not faking and instead giving up. There are some things in relationships that are important measures of trust. This might be one of them for this couple.

Or more straightforward- if you partner is totally cool with the fact that you're not always going to cum, and they would not like you to fake it and would trust you not to do it, i think it's kind of dick to fake it.

All this worrying about a partner's ego though seems kind of silly. Men need to get over their freaking egos, end of story. However, if you're with a man who's over it, and let's say for sake of argument a through and through feminist, I don't really understand the rationale to fake?

I apologize if I'm being naive here- I would very much like to hear other people's thoughts.

@Peter,

I cannot, of course, answer for Prof. Foxy but allow me to answer some of your questions.

Yes, I do truly believe that no one can make you feel anything, if you do not allow it. If you feel guilty, see if you've done something wrong over which to feel guilty about. If you have, fix it. If you haven't, then figure out what tape in your head is causing the irrational feelings of guilt. Seriously, think about this topic for a moment. Why in the world should a woman feel guilty for NOT having an orgasm? See how irrational that is? Pretty nearly as irrational as feeling guilty for having one, isn't it? But those tapes...see, we're taught to feel guilty for wanting to have one, i.e. wanting to have sex but by gosh, if we're going to go ahead with the slutty, we better as hell make sure the guy feels like the king he is and have an orgasm. We also know we're supposed to make it look as close to the porn-orgasms as possible, too. (BTW, they are faking more often than not.)

@ Proud Woman, Sometimes, despite the best efforts and desires of those involved, the orgasm just ain't happening--even if this is the same guy who usually bats in the high .900s. Faking is really the easy and quick way out of the situation. If you are anything like me, taking the easy way out seems to be wrong and lazy and anti-feminist and all that stuff but...well, at 12 midnight on a work night with 2 kids to get off to school and all the rest of it, do we really want to be up to 1am or 2 am "examining the problem"? I don't. I mean, if it happened all the time, okay there is a problem to be examined. But on the rare occasion? No. Actually, the only thing it tells me is that my body isn't robotic wherein if I press this button three times and twist that knob once, X is sure to happen every single time, which honestly, I don't see as a problem. I don't want my body to be robotic--I want it to be a human body. So, on those occasions where the spirit and mind are willing but the body is recalcitrant and time is an issue, I fake it. So, sue me. Just don't tell my husband.

[0+] Author Profile Page anonymous_coward replied to ChristinaM :

I would submit that if it's 12am and you tell your partner that it ain't gonna happen, and the result of that is that you're up till 1am-2am "examining the problem"... well, there's your problem right there.

Realize that for a lot of men it's not the end of the world, or even that big of a deal, if they make a solid effort but it isn't gonna happen. I think more men need to realize that women's bodies aren't robots like you mention.

[0+] Author Profile Page Dear Audrey replied to ChristinaM :

If you recognise your body as human, why are you faking it?
Why would not orgasming result in two or three hours 'examining the problem' if there is no problem?
I am very perplexed by your comments.

I imagine an even easier way out is to be honest with your partner and go to sleep.

Insecurity.

And it doesn't have to be with a stranger or someone you don't know very well for feelings to be hurt or insecurities to surface, esp. regarding sex. Actually, I've been married for 18 years. Insecurity over 'is s/he bored' or 'am I not as attractive as I used to be' happen to both sexes. I don't think it's a horrible thing to spare your partner that angst when it's not necessary or true.

I think there's a bit of disconnect here, though. If you're faking it every time, or most of the time, and you are doing it to stroke his ego at the expense of your own enjoyment, this is a problem. And a feminist one. If you are doing it because, as I said, it just isn't happening tonight for whatever reason, no harm to anyone so no foul. Shoot, there are times when masturbation won't produce an orgasm! If I can't do it for myself with the immediate biofeedback, how can *he* be expected to every single time without fail, even if he's doing everything right? And why in the world would I want him to feel failure and angst because of it? He didn't fail, it just didn't work this time for some reason. No big deal.

[0+] Author Profile Page Dear Audrey replied to ChristinaM :

Exactly, he didn't fail to get you off, and it's no big deal.
So why all the angst?
Instead of pandering to his irrational insecurity, why not promote understanding and acceptance of a perfectly normal and natural occurrence?

I don't want to delve into your personal relationship to discuss this issue, but perhaps challenging the idea of male ego being tied with female physical sexual responses would be a not entirely unfeminist thing to do. :-)

Yes, I do truly believe that no one can make you feel anything, if you do not allow it.

This is really patronizing, and I wish no one would ever say it again. An interview with an abused spouse, trafficked worker, or former FLDS member should disabuse anyone of this ridiculous notion. This particular conversation may be predicated on an equal relationship, but the broad statement that "no one can make you feel ______ without your permission" is simply incorrect.

Thanks, FB, for this comment--I'm glad someone called out this idea. While I feel like I "get" the original quote and where in our lives it can be applicable, there was something about it that gave me some apprehension. (Heheh, passive voice in that last part of the sentence! Ironical.) It can be read as a rugged individualism motto, if viewed in a certain (yucky) light. At worst, it can be seen as taking the responsibility off of the perpetrator and placing it on the survivor/victim. (I don't like the term "victim,"--implies no agency whatsoever, though in some situations, like those FB cites, an individual's agency can be eroded to scarily low levels.)

[0+] Author Profile Page Caton said:

Ha, this reminds me of when I first found out that mentioning on Feministing that you occasionally douche was like announcing that you sometimes like to set fire to kittens just to watch them die.

Sometimes a few of the commentators on Feministing can be a bit doctrinaire. Douching and faking orgasm are anti-feminist, period.

Well, not really. It's funny, I once caught my bf faking it. For some reason, something must have struck me as discordant, and I said "hey, did you just fake it?" And he said, umm, yeah. I asked why and he said that he just knew he wasn't going to come and he didn't want me to think it was my fault, he was just tired.

I laughed so much. That's exactly why I once in a while, fake it with him. Two people who have a genuine concern for each other's feelings. Is it the end of the world? Nah.

[0+] Author Profile Page Pantheon replied to Caton :

I don't see how douching is anti-feminist, but my doctor told me its generally bad for you because it can mess up the PH of your vagina. So it seems like in most cases its just not very healthy. I can see how feeling like you're pressured to douche is anti-feminist, but choosing to do it yourself is not.

[0+] Author Profile Page Cassie said:

Peter,

You brought up a good about sex and pure authenticity, but I think your comment is a bit too dramatic. Sex may involve some acting, if both parties are in to role play, but it doesn't need to take on faking or acting. I would consider 'faking' bad sex.

I think it's more about the connection and intimacy involved. If two people are connected to each other and in the moment, then there is no 'bad' sex. There's been times when I'm having sex with my partner and I don't cum, but it's still very intimate and I tell him where I'm at and we change what we're doing.

I think people put too much emphasis on having the 'orgasm' and not enough on actually being with each other and feeling everything that comes up.

[0+] Author Profile Page anitasaber replied to Cassie :

"I think people put too much emphasis on having the 'orgasm' and not enough on actually being with each other and feeling everything that comes up."

Agreed. My boyfriend is very into trying to make me orgasm during sex, which I love that he wants me to, but it's become so much of the focus that there's no way I'll be able to. What we have to do is just enjoy each other and let it go from there...

[0+] Author Profile Page Cassie said:

@PW- If you're not going to have an orgasm and he's trying his little heart out, tell him it's not working and do something different. My guess is if you're thinking too hard about having an orgasm, he's thinking to much about making sure you have one. The problem here: both of you are 'thinking' to much, instead of just being with each other.

From experience, there's been times when I'm stuck in my head about everything and I can't feel the intimacy, and I know he's trying really hard, and I feel bad for telling him I'm not going to orgasm. So when I've stopped and told him, he also feels good that I said something. And we'll cuddle or kiss. That gives me space to check in to see what my body actually wants. And sometimes my body just wants to be held or slow down.

I know, I know, as a woman, it's hard to tell our man to stop, but in the long run it'll help the relationship. Learn as you go, and don't beat yourself up over it.

[0+] Author Profile Page Pantheon said:

I faked it once and afterwards I felt like it had been pretty pointless, and I never did it again. Usually what we do is my boyfriend doesn't usually finish until after I tell him I'm done. Sometimes I tell him I'm done because I've orgasmed; more often its because I can tell I'm not going to and I'm starting to get sore. But in the middle of sex I don't announce that, I just say he can finish now. If he asks me after, I'm honest about it.

[0+] Author Profile Page ElleStar replied to Pantheon :

This is exactly what I do, too. If it's not happening for me, I just tell my SO, "You come." It's usually a signal that I've had an orgasm, but if I haven't, it's the sign that I've given up on it.

Faking it feels too much like lying to me. However, there are times that I have tiny, short vaginal orgasms that almost get lost in the activity of what's going on. So when he asks later if I came, there have been times I have to say, "I think so." It's weird. I still have a lot more to learn about my body when it comes to sex.

[0+] Author Profile Page questioning? said:

If he ever finds out that you faked orgasms, his ego will hurt far more than not cumming could ever cause.

[0+] Author Profile Page ItsJustMe said:

PW says she does it to save her partners ego sometimes. Do you know how much more damaging it would be to his ego if he ever found out you were faking it? Sometimes I can tell I'm not going to cum so I will let my partner know then give him a sexy grin and tell him it's going to be all about him tonight then I take over and please him. It eases his guilt and assures him that it's not something he was doing wrong. So what if I can't cum sometimes because in the end those sessions are PHENOMENAL for my partner and I. I love being selfless and pleasing him sometimes just as much as I love when he gives me a great orgasm.

I wouldn't say that faking it is good or bad, just that it's unnecessary.

[0+] Author Profile Page Marj replied to ItsJustMe :

In theory I agree with you. But it kills my boyfriend's fun so much if I don't come. Both of us are each other's firsts, and I think he's gotten the idea - from porn or men's magazines or something - that he's a bad sex partner if he doesn't make me orgasm every single time without fail -- after all, he does. I have resorted to faking it on numerous occasions, just because if I don't, sex becomes a sort of exercise in desperation on his end.

But I do know that it's the lazy, non-confrontational, less honest way out (I really don't care whether or not it's "anti-feminist"), and I'm trying to stop it gradually.

[0+] Author Profile Page lyndorr replied to Marj :

Once in a while I've pointed out to my boyfriend that certain expectations he has (like both people having an orgasm during intercourse, preferably at the same time) come from society and that we don't have to meet those expectations as long as we're both enjoying ourselves and that seems to help.

I mean if you still have fun even if you don't orgasm, then why is he bothered? Also, I think trying too hard (in desperation) can make it even harder to have an orgasm.

[0+] Author Profile Page Pantheon said:

I've got a question for the rest of you women-- is faking it something that only happens with vaginal intercourse, or do you also do it with oral sex? I ask because when I have a clitoral orgasm I can definitely tell, but when I'm having intercourse I'm not always so sure-- it isn't as clear cut. I am honestly not sure sometimes if I've had a vaginal orgasm or not. So is it faking it if I'm not even sure?

[0+] Author Profile Page smerdmann replied to Pantheon :

Many things I've read (ie- Anne Koedt's 'The Myth of the Vaginal Orgasm') suggest that vaginal orgasms are impossible for most women. I know they are for me, and I've never met a woman who's had one, so I don't bother aiming for that. It's nice in a way that the clitoris needs to be stimulated (for me) to orgasm because it allows us to pay attention to each other one at a time and eliminates the expectation that some crazy humping will lead to simultaneous ecstasy. Not to say that intercourse doesn't feel good, but it definitely doesn't lead (me) to orgasm. (I'm not trying to speak for everyone here. I'm interested to hear from those who HAVE experienced vaginal orgasm...)

[0+] Author Profile Page everyday22 replied to smerdmann :

*raises hand* I have.

They're definitely not as intense as clitoral orgasms, but I can usually achieve them rather quickly and have many in succession. During intercourse, I usually lose count. Fingers, dildos, penises---stick anything in my insanely responsive vagina and I'll orgasm in a minute or two.

Am I freak of nature? I don't know, but I know a lot of other women who can have vaginal orgasms, too.

On the other hand, clitoral orgasms can take a while for me, and that's *with* a vibrator. You can forget oral; to me, it's like getting a backrub or something.

I would disagree that vaginal orgasms are impossible for most women. There wouldn't be all these books out about finding the G spot if they were. I might agree that vaginal orgasms are impossible for most women from PIV sex, because I have found that it takes a partner with exactly the right size penis *and* the right position and technique. It's a lot easier to accomplish with finger fucking. I have had both kinds, and while for me clitoral orgasms are usually more intense, they're both enjoyable.

[0+] Author Profile Page Caton replied to smerdmann :

That's really interesting. I can and very often do come with no direct clitoral stimulation, while my bf is inside of me. However, I need the nipple stimulation. I realize that everyone's body is different, but I seem to have a direct connection between nipples and clitoris. In fact, orgasms resulting from intercourse while my bf is licking my nipples are the most powerful ones I have. But, with no nipple stimulation and just straight intercourse, no, it's not going to happen for me, unless I'm on top.

i pretty much ***only*** ever have vaginal orgasm.

i know, weird.

clit stimulation feels great to me, but i rarely if ever finish without having my g-spot stimulated. PIV sex is my favorite thing, though handjobs are good, too.

believe me, my friends and my boyfriends have told me how weird i am.

[0+] Author Profile Page SociologicalMe replied to Pantheon :

I've had some vaginal muscle contractions that felt good and may have been what some people consider vaginal orgasms. But they've never been strong enough for me to actually feel done and satisfied the way a clitoral orgasm does. Or two or three successive clitoral orgasms...

[0+] Author Profile Page Pantheon replied to SociologicalMe :

Yeah, see, I get something like that too. Its really hard to tell.

When I'm using a vibrator and have a clitoral orgasm, its really really obvious (and I've never had one without a vibrator, which makes me a little sad-- maybe I've desensitised myself, even though I use them on the low setting most of the time). But when I'm having sex, its a lot harder to tell. Usually it feels good the whole time (unless I'm getting sore) and then at some point there will be some tingles and it will feel even better for a moment. Is that a vaginal orgasm? I'm really not sure. So when my boyfriend asks me if I came sometimes I say yes, or no, or I think so... Its something I'm honestly not even sure about. But I don't make fake orgasm-y noises or anything.

[0+] Author Profile Page SociologicalMe replied to Pantheon :

I always tell him the truth when it's confusing like that- I think I may have had one, it's not like the other kind I usually have, it felt great though, etc. Sometimes I say it felt great but I'm still turned on, so now let's turn the focus to my clit...

[0+] Author Profile Page hecate66 replied to Pantheon :

What's important to note here, is that an orgasm is an orgasm. There is no "clitoral" or "vaginal" orgasms. An orgasm is the rapid contraction of the pelvic floor muscles. Clitoral and vaginal stimulation can both trigger orgasms, but so can anal stimulation, urethral stimulation, nipple play, and fantasy, just to name a few.

We get so caught up in clitoral vs vaginal (blame Freud if you want), but physiologically they are just an orgasm. We shouldn't be trying to have one over the other, they both cause the same thing. Some women like clitoral stimulation, some like vaginal, some even prefer anal stimulation. We need better education to dispel the vaginal/clitoral orgasm myth. Tell your friends :)

[0+] Author Profile Page hecate66 replied to hecate66 :

There "are" no clitoral or vaginal orgasms, not "is" no. Sorry for the poor grammar, it's early.

[0+] Author Profile Page Pantheon replied to hecate66 :

You may be technically correct (I think its debatable) but most people define vaginal orgasm as one caused by vaginal stimulation, and clitoral orgasm as one caused by clitoral stimulation. The distinction is still very valid when we're discussing what type of sexual activity works to produce them, and how they feel different.

[0+] Author Profile Page hecate66 replied to Pantheon :

If you think it’s debatable, then which muscles contract when you have a “clitoral” orgasm and which ones contract during a “vaginal” orgasm? I realize that we incorrectly consider them different when different things trigger them. That is what I was trying to correct. Most people defining it as such does not make it correct, I am sure that we can think of many erroneous beliefs held by many people (most gendered beliefs, for example).

The focusing on vaginal vs. clitoral puts even more pressure on women to orgasm and to orgasm a specific way. Believing that they are different has led countless women to either think they are weird for the way they come or to try to switch their natural way of coming to a particular prescribed method. We should be talking about what kind of stimulation gets us off, vaginal, nipple, anal, whatever, not focusing on different types of orgasms. And yes, they may feel different, but all orgasm can feel different: masturbation with a vibe vs. a shower head, oral sex vs. tribbing, today vs. tomorrow, really tired vs. extra horny. While the type of stimulation may influence the feeling of the orgasm, it is not the only thing that does, and vaginal vs. clitoral stimulation need not feel different to every woman, for some it does, for other it does not.

[0+] Author Profile Page Pantheon replied to hecate66 :

There is a difference, and the difference is, are you orgasming while being penetrated, or are you orgasming from clitoral stimulation (or some other option)? Whether the same muscles are spasming is really besides the point of what I was saying, which is that orgasms can be caused by different sex acts.

If I write about how I can easily tell when I have an orgasm from clitoral stimulation, but I'm not so sure when I have one from vaginal penetration, what is the point of telling me there's no difference between those?

The same muscles contracting does not mean you experience it in the same way. For an obvious distinction, in one case there's a big object inside of you that's in the way, which will affect how far the muscles can spasm. In the other case there is nothing there.

Freud had a lot of messed up ideas, including the idea that having an orgasm from penetration is somehow more mature and we should avoid having them from clitoral stimulation. That is ridiculous. But that doesn't mean that there aren't still different ways of producing an orgasm, or that different orgasms can't feel different.

[0+] Author Profile Page Pantheon replied to hecate66 :

Oh, and what's debatable is just how you define them. I know Freud had some weird ideas, but I'm not basing anything on his definitions. As far as most people discuss it, a vaginal orgasm comes from vaginal penetration, and a clitoral orgasm comes from clitoral stimulation. After awhile, words mean what most people use them to mean. There are many cases where there's an academic distinction to a word that most people really don't use in everyday conversation-- for example, in another thread recently someone said that "racism" academically doesn't just mean prejudice based on race, but also must include the ability to act on that prejudice. Well, ok, that just isn't how most people use the word. Another example that came up recently-- the clinical definition of "fetish" may not include body parts, but most people will still refer to a "foot fetish." So, my point was that people in everyday conversation can still talk about their different types of orgasms without meaning that they are subscribing to an obscure psychoanalytic definition. The fact is, many women can produce orgasms in different ways and experience them differently, even if the same muscles are involved, and its very counterproductive to tell us we can't talk about that.

[0+] Author Profile Page Arium replied to hecate66 :

Freud's artificial distinction between the clitoral and vaginal orgasm was not problematic by itself. Freud's assertion that vaginal orgasms are more "mature" was far more troublesome.

[0+] Author Profile Page hecate66 replied to Arium :

Yeah, that always pissed me off. But then again, so many things from Freud do.

My bf & I have the opposite problem. It's easy for me to come, usually multiple times, but it's much harder for him to and it takes a long time. Sometimes we give up on him finishing. Part of it is we have to use condoms. He told me that sometimes he doesn't come but it feels really good like an orgasm. It's kind of a gross analogy but he said it was kind of like dry-heaving as compared to vomiting, except good. That his body makes the motion to orgasm and it feels good but it's not really and orgasm and he doesn't ejaculate. Maybe 1/3 of the time he has one of those, 1/3 he orgasms and 1/3 he doesn't come at all. I wonder if any other men have an experience like that?

[0+] Author Profile Page Pantheon replied to ggg_girl :

Supposedly men who learn tantric sex techniques aspire to being able to feel like they had an orgasm without ejaculating-- then they can have multiple orgasms without losing their erection. So I don't know all that much about it, but it might actually be a good thing. You guys should look into those theories.

[0+] Author Profile Page ItsJustMe replied to ggg_girl :

This might not be much help, but it's all I have to offer.

Sometimes when my partner is fighting back an orgasm (as in, we JUST started having sex and he doesn't want to cum yet) he will hold it back enough so that he doesn't ejaculate, yet his penis spasms and it feels exactly like an orgasm.

Maybe it is some sort of mental block like your boyfriend is holding back just enough that his body still has an orgasm but he doesn't ejaculate.

@Pantheon haha I'll tell him he's mastered a tantric sex technique without realizing it.

@JustMe, he has the opposite problem of taking a long time to come, so he's definitely not holding back ;)

[0+] Author Profile Page CleanNeedlesSaveLives replied to ggg_girl :

Have you ever tried using a female condom? Some men find it less restrictive; some women prefer it because it gives them more control. You can insert it up to eight hours before intercourse, and it will actually warm to your body temperature and mold to your shape.

We haven't tried the female condom but I'm not sure if we would enjoy it, especially since it covers more skin (less skin-to-skin contact). Maybe we'll try it though.

What's sexy and considerate about lying to your partner? Especially when it comes to sharing an intimate experience?

As someone who has been faked on and someone who believes that honesty is a pretty important to a healthy relationship, I'm deeply disappointed with this article. An ego boost is not worth lying to the person you love. When they find out they're going to feel like shit [i]not only[/i] because they couldn't satisfy you, but because you feel like you can't trust them enough to admit it.

If it's not exactly anti-feminist it is disrespectful to your partner and not conducive to a happy, healthy love and sex life.

[0+] Author Profile Page Dear Audrey replied to SaynaTheSpiffy :

Yes!!!
What's so damn sexy about dishonesty and deceit?

If your partner is so freakin' fragile that the fact that you are a human being and not a sexbot fucktoy that orgasms on command, is going to turn a sexual encounter into two or three hours of 'explaining the problem' than it's not exactly indicative of a healthy honest relationship.

Personally I couldn't stand faking with my partner, I love them far too much to bullshit them.

[0+] Author Profile Page Joanne replied to SaynaTheSpiffy :

Agreed, I could never fake, I would feel terrible with myself.

An orgasm is not the be all and end all of sex, but faking suggests that it is, for you or him. Not only is it an unnecessary lie, it just confirms that the orgasm is everything, forget about the rest of the sex experience. Furthermore, I think that saying giving an orgasm to someone is an ego boost puts even more emphasis on the reward/failure thinking behind sex. It's not supposed to be like trying to hit the jackpot on a slot machine!

If it doesn't happen, it doesn't happen )although it often does), no big deal really, I still enjoy the rest of it.

[0+] Author Profile Page Joanne replied to Joanne :

...and in those situations where it doesn't happen, it's ok to say so, but that this is alright.

Although my boyfriend does sometimes say he feels so much better when I do come, I think that he can handle the other times.

[0+] Author Profile Page archy said:

hmm... for me the real problem with faking may be that you end up with a bunch of men who think they are doing everything right, and god's gift and whatnot, but who really have no clue.

And when these men find themselves with inexperienced women, it's suddenly the woman's fault if she can't come, and there is something wrong with her.

Generally I come easily, and I've had enough partners to know what works and what doesn't, but I have talked with women (including my mother) who spent their entire lives thinking there was something wrong with them b/c their much more experienced partner was sure he was doing everything right.

[0+] Author Profile Page Chas replied to archy :

Couldn't agree more. Never faked it, never will. It does no one - man nor woman - any favours. No one should consider their partner so fragile that they're unable to take some adult honesty in the form of 'sorry honey, that's just not going to do it for me tonight'. The fact that women fake at all, to me, is evidence of just how far we still have to go in terms of negotiating pleasurable sexual encounters. If I thought my partner faked anything to please me, I'd be mortified. I'd also be very concerned that he was unable to just tell me and had resorted to playing games. Why admitting you're not going to come, or stopping a sexual encounter because it's just not pressing your buttons, is still such a big deal for so many women just baffles me.

[0+] Author Profile Page Sehnsucht said:

I only fake with myself, is that wrong?

Seriously, though, I used to fake all the time with my first sex partner, until I realized how dumb it was and that I would never get any satisfaction if I kept letting guys think that what they were doing was actually enjoyable for me.

I also think that if you're going to be in a relationship with someone, honesty is key. If you would never lie to your loved one about other parts of your life, why would you lie about that? Maybe it's just this severe aversion I have to being dishonest, but I see it as all the same.

[0+] Author Profile Page CleiacHost said:

If what you get from him is as lovely as a juicy Big O, despite not quite being it - then do it, but only if you lack the comms to convey that fact, that it was exquisite, that it worked for you, regardless.

"Lack the comms" is not a judgemental term - just being factual. Some things maybe don't translate?

Otherwise, I dunno - which I think is the only honest response.

[0+] Author Profile Page CleiacHost said:

PS Off a different topic, and apols in advance: I dispute that "no-one can make you feel anything"?

What, then was going on in the past, when women were publicly and socially "made" to feel second rate?

What did rape do, if not "make" someone feel, something?

Or to be cartoon-esque, what if (grotesque but important) I turned up with a chainsaw, and hacked all your loved ones into little pieces?

Slowly?

Would I not then have made you feel, at least, grief, anger, whatever?

Answers welcome - this bugs me, maybe I am hijacking though, in which case sorry.

[0+] Author Profile Page SociologicalMe replied to CleiacHost :

I always hate the "no one can make you feel anything" bit. When my clinical depression is really, really under control I can kind of see what they mean about it. The rest of the time it makes me furious and seems completely unfair and victim-blaming. There are degrees- if it's a small slight I CAN choose not to dwell on it, etc- but some things I think if you don't react to them in a serious, emotional way, it would be really unhealthy.

[0+] Author Profile Page Chrissy said:

When I was with men I faked it often, but that's a whole other terrible sexual experiences story.

However, I'm in a same sex relationship now, and I've found that for my girlfriend and I faking is never really an issue.
Generally, we keep doing each other until the receptive partner says to stop, as it's difficult to tell when we've orgasmed versus just hit a plateau (and stopping is what you DON'T want!).
So when I'm "done", either because I've orgasmed or because I'm just not feeling it, I just indicate that I'm done. She does the same. Sometimes afterwards we'll talk about it, and neither of us have any qualms about saying that we didn't get off. In the moment though, it doesn't really matter.

I'm not sure how this would work with opp. sex couples, but it works well for us.

[0+] Author Profile Page LoveKrystal replied to Chrissy :

yep.. that sounds about right.. you bring up a good point about plateau .. i should bring that up to my bf. he doesnt get it sometimes.. but he tries. i think it sound like you and your girlfriend have good open communication.. and i think thats most important when it comes to sex. and i think that may be the issue when people fake it.

I'm a man and I've faked it before. I think men faking is more common than is generally acknowledged.

Anyway, I think you can fake it here and there and still teach a man what you want him to do for you.

[0+] Author Profile Page Siby said:


Orgasm only being the "icing on the cake" doesn't really apply to me. If I have sex without reaching orgasm, it feels more like labor than pleasure. The emotional pleasure that I get from giving him pleasure is nice, but the physical pleasure that I get is absolutely nothing. For me, it's just uncomfortable to have sex and not climax.
When I'm with a guy who can't give me an orgasm, he has to either be willing to learn or he's not going to get sex from me (which means the relationship is over, in most cases). It's no big deal if I have sex with him just a few times without reaching orgasm, but if it's most of the time I'm not going to want to have sex at all.

The only way I see this as being a feminist issue, as opposed to a personal one, is that sex always seems to revolve around the male orgasm. I would guess that most couples have never had sex without the man having an orgasm, but it just so happens that many (or maybe even most, I don't know the statistics) women don't have orgasms during sex at all. The majority of men probably can't even imagine not achieving orgasm during sex, so why do we disregard the fact that many/most women don't? Why is female orgasm so unimportant? Why does sex always end when the guy has an orgasm, regardless or whether or not his partner has had one as well?

I have had sex many times with my bf with him not orgasming and me climaxing. I wrote about it a few comments up. I would guess there are more times this situation occurs than the media and popular culture may lead us to believe.

[0+] Author Profile Page Siby said:

However, with that being said, asseenontv has a good point. There may be a lot more men faking it then I assume.

[0+] Author Profile Page SociologicalMe said:

This is a toughie. I would have always said faking is universally bad, for all the reasons everyone has covered. And I'll admit that reading PW's description of the sexual experience kind of made me cranky for an orgasm finish to it. It's a very accurate description, it seems to me, of the point during a sexual encounter at which I ask my husband to hold me or kiss me or stay involved some other way while I reach down and finish myself off with my hand. But I'm very used to an orgasm finish, and a big clitoral one at that. I can't say I've ever faked orgasm, but I've definitely exaggerated his role in giving one to me, while still telling him what I need from him to make it even better next time. So I don't know... if PW really is getting her needs met, emotionally and sexually, and so is her partner, I guess I don't see a problem with it.

[0+] Author Profile Page a.k.a. Ninapendamaishi said:

Umm... seems to me we'd have a healthier culture in general if orgasm wasn't seen as a necessary defining characteristic of sex (this goes for both men and women here). I'm just not big on the idea of goal-oriented sex, I guess. If you're mostly focused on the goal can you still enjoy the ride as much?

I can orgasm on my own just fine. I don't know when I'll ever be able to with a partner. I would like my partners to understand that if I'm enjoying the experience enough that's all that matters, and I'd like men to take the same attitude towards me (that is, that they can still enjoy it and it still "counts" even if I don't manage to give them an orgasm).

I don't fake because it teaches bad habits, and because I think most of the partners I've had have sturdy enough egos to take it if I don't get off. (Also I think my SO would know, and he'd be infinitely more irritated and hurt that I'd lied to him than that I hadn't come. I didn't come for the first five months we were involved, and he just did his best to make sure I was having -fun.- Which made it easier to relax, and eventually, to get off, which now happens most of the time.)

If someone doing something that doesn't get me off, but I fake it and let them think it does, they think what they're doing is pleasing me. They want to please me again. So they do the same thing again. Again, I don't get off. And while I'm totally fine with the fact that sometimes, I just don't have an orgasm, I'm not fine with letting someone keep doing things I don't actually enjoy. And if I did like it, but it just didn't make me come, what's wrong with saying "I loved that, it just didn't get me off. Don't worry about it, sweetie, I still had a good time"?

I generally appreciate it when a partner tells me what to do differently if what I'm doing isn't quite the thing. It's not them saying I'm inadequate. I can't know everything about another person's body right off the bat. It's nice when they teach me, so I can put that information to use and genuinely please them.

[0+] Author Profile Page Blithely Zealotic said:

My Personal experience only: I sometimes faked. My partner was incredibly insecure and needy, and sometimes I just didn't have the energy to reassure him it was good (especially when it wasn't... sex causes me pain because of medical conditions). I didn't want to get into a long argument.

I later learned how to say no to painful sex, so this is not an issue as much.

But wanting to please a partner can be a huge factor in the decision. How do you negotiate when you took your partner's virginity, all he knows is sex with you, and it causes you physical pain? Now he has a complex about it. As much as it sucked for me, I really cared about how he felt. Part of me also thinks he'd be insecure about it regardless of my experience. Oh well, live and learn.

[0+] Author Profile Page Blithely Zealotic said:

Oh, and a note to men:

THE BEST WAY TO HELP A PARTNER NOT FAKE IS TO NOT TAKE IT PERSONALLY!
I cannot emphasize how much I was tempted to fake if I knew my lack of orgasm would lead to all kinds of annoying emotional stuff. If she doesn't orgasm, the WORST thing you can do is put her in a place where she has to reassure YOU! This is not the way it should be.

Think about it this way.

Guys rarely if ever fake - and most men who were consistently having non orgasm producing sex with a woman would stop having sex with her (and would not hesitate to tell her why - with little to no concern about "hurting her feelings").

So, why is faking it OK for women - even "occasionally".

And not telling a man he can't make you cum A) makes your orgasm less important than his and B) wastes a "teachable moment" where you could show him how to make you cum.

So, yeah, faking orgasms actually IS a feminist issue!

[0+] Author Profile Page Blithely Zealotic replied to GREGORYABUTLER :

Women are taught it's their "duty" to please their husbands sexually. There have been legislations about this, that a wife must be sexually available to her husband at all times.

As teenagers, girl's desire/pleasure is seen as a non issue, and non existant. That's why the "oral sex epidemic" that people wring their hands over is not about girls being on the receiving end. Girls are taught shame about their "down there" parts from an early age.

In my highschool, many girls who allowed boys to give them oral sex were ridiculed for their "smell". How can anyone seek out pleasure in an atmosphere that's bent on slut shaming?

[0+] Author Profile Page Platypunk said:

I've had vaginal orgasms as well. I think it has something to do with the way I used to masturbate, I didn't figure out how to work the clit until after I'd been doing it the other way. It's not always easy to cum this way unless I'm on top and can adjust myself to a certain angle, otherwise I have to be either really aroused or able to touch myself.

[0+] Author Profile Page justsarahbarah said:

For the record, I have faked it while having sex with women, so I do not think this is solely an issue of men having fragile patriarchal egos, but rather an issue of the sensitive issue of sexual performance.

It would be nice to be able to have an honest conversation with every sexual partner and to expect them to take it well, but sometimes we aren't that emotionally connected. If we/I have sex with people I don't know very, very well, this lack of communication is sometimes the natural outcome. And that doesn't make me a bad feminist, it just makes me a woman trying to navigate the sometimes complicated nature of sex.

[0+] Author Profile Page LoveKrystal said:

for me.. faking it doesnt make any sense.. for my and my boyfriend sex is something fun that we do.. and if he's tired and isnt going to cum.. thats okay.. and if i just cant get there.. thats okay too.. and also.. if he's too tired to get me to cum.. i whip out my handy vibrator.. i think faking it is lying.. and its a pretty ugly lie to tell just because its not so serious that you need to lie about it.. and plus.. it always made me nervous in my past relationship to fake it .. because i never wanted a guy to think that was something that got me off.. if it wasnt. because i never wanted a guy to be like.. doing the thing that i "faked it" on last time .. thinking its gonna get me off. but its not cuz i faked it last time.

Thats my take on Fakin it. Id rather just say.. let try again tomorrow.. :)

Both women and men have posted here saying that they have faked/not come during sex or that their partners have faked/not climaxed (including my bf who fairly often doesn't climax), so I don't think it's strictly a women-not-coming/faking thing.

That being said, it certainly seems that part of the dialogue surrounding this issue is that women are the ones that are nearly always having difficulty achieving orgasm or faking.

This may be true in many cases, but I see this dialogue as an "othering" of female sexuality; in this dialogue female sexuality is complicated and mysterious, whereas male sexuality is the default. Men are accessible, easy to please in bed, their sexuality is uncomplicated, etc. It's time to re-examine the notions that it's always easy for men to come but not for women to, or that male sexuality isn't complex but female sexuality is.

These notions are constantly espoused in magazine articles, etc. but just don't hold up when anyone I know shares their actual sexual experiences. They could be true for many people, but not true for many others. These generalizations don't help any of us understand our sexuality either.

[0+] Author Profile Page sarah said:

I faked it one time with an ex boyfriend. I told myself I was NEVER going to do it again because it felt wrong and stupid and I felt like I was doing myself a huge disservice.

With my current boyfriend, I value him and myself too much to fake it.

Oh and just because you faked it and now you feel bad doesn't mean you can twist it into being a feminist decision when it isn't.
We have all faked it at one point or another, but we know that it's bad for women, it's bad for the relationship and it's anti-feminist.

I have never cum during sex. I have never cum from oral. I have cum from being fingered ONCE. Even masturbating is practically a labor of love for me, most of the time.

If ever it was impossible for a woman to cum during P-in-V sex, I would be that woman. But I love sex, orgasm or none. I initiate it at least as often as he does. If I'm not in the mood, I don't just do it anyway out of some strange societal obligation. So to tell me that it is somehow wrong for me to exaggerate it on occasion for the benefit of my boyfriend - whose greatest turn-on seems to be my pleasured reactions - just rubs me the wrong way. I don't give a flying fuck whether or not anyone else think it's "feminist enough" or not, it's what works for me.

[0+] Author Profile Page sarah replied to Joy :

Ss it against the rules to observe and analyze why we do the things we do?

[0+] Author Profile Page Joy replied to sarah :

Of course not, I just did it in my own post. I see a tendency to overgeneralize potential motivations for faking it (societal pressure) across the board, when different women do it for different reasons, some of which aren't remotely anti-feminist.

[0+] Author Profile Page sarah replied to Joy :

Well it's fine and dandy that you care so much about your boyfriends feelings enough to exaggerate your pleasure, but I wouldn't say it's feminist.

[0+] Author Profile Page justsarahbarah replied to sarah :

Sigh...that's kind of judgmental.

[0+] Author Profile Page Dear Audrey replied to justsarahbarah :

This discussion is about analysing whether faking is a feminist action.
I think it is safe to say that Sarah was making a judgment..... about the topic :-)
I'm of the opinion that faking orgasm for male pleasure is NOT a feminist action.
Joy - if your partner is turned on by your pleasured responses, instead of faking your response, how about he does something that.. you know... pleasures you. For real.
I know you "don't care" about other people's opinions on the subject of your own enactment of male fantasy, but surely you can see that even if you want to make it all about him, your genuine pleasure must be more of a turn on than faking?

I'm sorry - did you even read my post?

I find sex pleasurable. I find oral pleasurable. I find fingering pleasurable. But only ONCE have I ever had an orgasm from ANY of those things, with ANY of my partners.

Sometimes I exaggerate my reaction because my boyfriend likes to know he's pleasuring me - and while he definitely DOES give me pleasure, it just does not come in the form of the orgasm that so many people seem to think is the be-all, end-all of all sexual pleasure. And frankly, he shares the opinion which you seem to have, which is that if I'm not coming, he's obviously doing something wrong. I do NOT want him to feel that way, because he knows my body amazingly well and I love the way we fit together - and that's somehow unfeminist?

Different women have different bodies. It is EXTREMELY difficult for me to achieve an orgasm, even during masturbation.

[0+] Author Profile Page Dear Audrey replied to Joy :

Of course I read your post, how else would I know to reply? *looks confuzzled*
Or are you just implying that what I am saying has no merit because I lack basic comprehension skills or something? :-)

I did said 'something pleasureable' not orgasm, if whatever he is doing is not generating a response you and he deem 'groanworthy' maybe explaining that women have different sexual responses to those commonly seen in porn might be in order, certainly not conforming to them :-(

If you are genuinely enjoying sex, I don't see why you would need to fake. Some women loudly proclaim their enjoyment, others are quieter, even when they *are* orgasming. This is normal!!

Loving how you fit together is not the issue here, faking response to fit the idea of a one-size-fits-all form of womens' sexual expression is.

[0+] Author Profile Page sarah replied to Dear Audrey :


If you are genuinely enjoying sex, I don't see why you would need to fake. Some women loudly proclaim their enjoyment, others are quieter, even when they *are* orgasming. This is normal!!

Loving how you fit together is not the issue here, faking response to fit the idea of a one-size-fits-all form of womens' sexual expression is.


THIS. Agree 10000%

[0+] Author Profile Page Arium replied to justsarahbarah :

I don't understand this concept that an action must be either feminist or anti-feminist.

I presume that we're in consensus that an attitude that women's pleasure doesn't matter would be anti-feminist.

If a woman chooses to fake orgasms for whatever reason, I don't see this as a feminist issue. It is neither feminist nor anti-feminist. It is non-feminist.

[0+] Author Profile Page Dear Audrey replied to Arium :

Faking orgasm is a feminist issue.
When women feel societal pressure to conform to an idea of sexual expression that isn't genuine, that isn't real, that is commercialised and commodified and doesn't reflect reality, it's as much of a feminist issue as conforming to the beauty myth.

[0+] Author Profile Page Arium replied to Dear Audrey :

I agree with you that the societal pressure you discussed is a feminist issue.

The point I was trying to make was that I find the feminist critique of an individual action, whether it's orgasm-faking (or leg-shaving or lipstick-wearing or whatever), to be problematic. To stand in judgment of individual actions amounts to pressuring women to conform to an arbitrary feminist ideal. Pressure to conform is bad, regardless of its source.

[0+] Author Profile Page Dear Audrey replied to Arium :

But Arium, if we don't critique, challenge and question ideas such a beauty norms, we don't change anything. What is the impetus for change besides awareness and understanding? Discussing an issue is not about judging an individual personally. Your statement that faking orgasms is non-feminist fails to take into account the social pressures that I've mentioned. I'm sure you've heard of the phrase 'the personal is political' I strongly believe it is up to us as feminists to raise our awareness of feminist issues, however this doesn't mean we must live by each and every feminist ideal at all times, or our feminist club membership will be revoked; this would be neither practical not beneficial to all women. We all assimilate to some extent and conform to the values and mores of society.

Feminist ideals are far from arbitrary, though they are debatable, and that is what we are doing. Facilitating an understanding of the specific issue of women faking orgasms.
Silencing debate because discussing faking orgasms involves critiquing faking orgasms is not particularly helpful or constructive.
It seems to me that your post is (ironically) a pressure on me to conform to your arbitrary idea of what is a suitable or 'unproblematic' topic for debate. :-(


[0+] Author Profile Page Arium replied to Dear Audrey :

I'm starting to wonder if our disagreement isn't over semantics.

But Arium, if we don't critique, challenge and question ideas such a beauty norms, we don't change anything. What is the impetus for change besides awareness and understanding? Discussing an issue is not about judging an individual personally.

I agree.

Your statement that faking orgasms is non-feminist fails to take into account the social pressures that I've mentioned.

I believe my qualification of the context of individual actions takes this into account.

I'm sure you've heard of the phrase 'the personal is political'

My current understanding of this phrase is that harms that affect individual women are political issues. Until recently, I thought it meant that individual actions can harm the cause. I felt relief when I learned that my previous understanding was erroneous.

I strongly believe it is up to us as feminists to raise our awareness of feminist issues, however this doesn't mean we must live by each and every feminist ideal at all times, or our feminist club membership will be revoked; this would be neither practical not beneficial to all women.

I agree.

Silencing debate because discussing faking orgasms involves critiquing faking orgasms is not particularly helpful or constructive.

This is not my intent. I wish only to ensure that debates enhance awareness and understanding without being judgmental.

[0+] Author Profile Page Dear Audrey replied to Arium :

Arium,

I'm glad we agree :-)

I think it is quite clear that no one here blames individual women personally for faking orgasms, as most of us seem to be aware of the pornified context in which women's sexuality is viewed in our society and culture; however claiming that faking is a 'non-feminist' action, outside the scope of feminist critique is not conducive to enhancing awareness, it removes the discussion from a feminist viewpoint.

I think maybe the single most useful thing for men to learn is that many (most?) women can enjoy sex without having an orgasm. And if she doesn't come every single time, it doesn't mean you're lousy in bed.

But where are men going to learn that? Not from any depiction of sex in mainstream culture (movies, TV, the odd porn flick) that I've ever seen. We learn that when women are having sex we should moan and groan and thrash around in apparent ecstasy. With that kind of expectation, no wonder. Too much pressure.

Being able to relax and enjoy sex without being focussed on coming ... well, if anything, I'd say that's more likely to produce results.

At least we have an expectation that in straight sex men are going to try to please their female partner. That's certainly a feminist issue, and I expect that's changed a lot over the years. Now we just have to work on the "how."

I love orgasms, but I don't always feel the need to have one. Everything leading up to it is damn good, too. I'd rather have the freedom to not feel like I MUST orgasm.

If the big O doesn't happen, it doesn't happen. I don't mind - and I've let my husband know this. Some days, he'll want me to when I just...well...won't, for whatever reason, but I won't fake it for him. It would feel too much like deception, and if he ever found out I were lying about it, or if he even suspected it, he would be a lot more upset than were I not to "finish" every now and then.

[0+] Author Profile Page Arium said:

One point that I haven't seen raised is that faking is not always done for the sake of protecting a partner's ego. I submit an (admittedly rare) scenario in which faking is done for the sake of expediency, for want of a better term.

In this scenario my SO and I engage in intercourse, in a position that provides more stimulation for her than for me. After a while, we both realize that neither of us is as into it as we thought. For her, this means an orgasm seems unattainable. For me, this means this position is not going to bring me to orgasm without the added mental stimulation of her orgasm. Regardless my SO accommodates my desire for an orgasm. Given the choice between switching positions (with the loss of momentum that would entail) and faking, my SO may choose the latter.

I don't view this as a deception, but rather as her pragmatically utilizing her knowledge of my sexual response.

[0+] Author Profile Page sarah replied to Arium :

I think that the main problem with faking is dishonesty, but it seems that you and your partner understand each other and know that if you fake it, it's not because you're being dishonest. So I'd say that is the exception and not the rule.

My first response is always "do you masturbate?" How can we expect our partners to please us if we do not even know how to please ourselves?

Heh. One thing I know, masturbating doesn't please me.

[0+] Author Profile Page Siby replied to FrumiousB :

It took so many tries and many hours of trying different things before masturbating could please me. Have you tries using a vibrator? My first orgasm was from using a vibrator on my clit.

My first was also from a vibrator, the ever-trusty Hitachi Magic Wand.

[0+] Author Profile Page justsarahbarah said:

Also, um, not to be repetitive, but this thread is really heteronormative. Enough with the notes to men already: lesbians and gay men fake it, straight men and straight men fake it.

[0+] Author Profile Page jellyleelips said:

Faking is not only anti-feminist, it's anti-pleasure. I used to fake it all the time, because it was definitely easier than admitting to myself and to my partners that I wasn't coming and that they weren't doing enough. I think it comes from the fact that I come with partners through oral, and really don't enjoy coming during PIV intercourse with clitoral stimulation. I come every time I masturbate. I was self-conscious about asking for oral almost every time I had sex (even though none of the guys who were worth it cared in the least about going down on me every time) and I really wanted to give the guy the satisfaction of "cumming on his dick." How stupid and porny is that? I think all the faking also had to do with the fact that I didn't think I had a g-spot until a little over a year ago when one of my partners magically found it. I still haven't had a g-spot orgasm, but now PIV sex is intensely pleasurable even without coming. Tehanu said it right, that hetero and bi men need to understand that women can greatly enjoy PIV sex without cumming.

Now that I've stopped faking it and started communicating more, my eyes have really opened to male insecurities about female orgasms. A few weeks ago I brought an attractive gentleman home with me after a party and he was just way too stressed out that I wasn't going to come. If I said, "I'm not going to come," he responded with, "YES YOU ARE" and apologized the entire time that he wasn't making me come. It's tough to explain to guys who are this insecure that it says nothing negative about them if they listened to my directions, tried their best, and I still didn't come.

Faking it really starts a vicious cycle. Woman feels bad she takes a long time to come, needs very specific stimulation, can't come during PIV sex, yadayadayada, then starts faking it to make man feel better. Man feels like a stud, woman feels guilty and admits she's been faking, man feels like complete shit and becomes obsessed with making her come. He becomes super stressed out when they have sex and tries wayyy too hard without enjoying it, she feels even more pressure because he is so focused on her orgasm, so she likely continues to fake it. And the whole thing starts again! I don't think faking is bad because it teaches men the wrong technique, it's bad because it causes extreme stress, insecurity, anxiety, confusion, and poor communication. While I think it is anti-feminist to do something that WILL hurt your relationship in the long run, I will never knock individual women for faking it. I completely understand why they do.

[0+] Author Profile Page jellyleelips replied to jellyleelips :

I just realized that the start of my last paragraph sounds like I'm blaming women entirely for faking it. I didn't mean it to sound like that, I meant it more as an acknowledgment of societal pressures that portray some women's sexuality as wrong that make many women consider faking orgasms.

[0+] Author Profile Page sarah replied to jellyleelips :

I always liked when guys wanted me to come. I understand some people don't like the pressure, but I guess I work well under pressure.

Before I was a feminist, I felt like I needed permission to come, because I felt embarrassed to reach down and stimulate my clit without them aware of what I was going to do. I felt like they would be weirded out that I could only come from clit stimulation.

Now that I'm with a partner who cares about me, I always cum because I touch my clit while we have sex. It takes a lot of confience as a woman to be able to make yourself cum while having sex, when you've always been told it should 'just happen'.

[0+] Author Profile Page jellyleelips replied to sarah :

I wonder if I can't get over a mental hurdle with regard to touching my clit when I have sex. I think sometimes I still feel like an orgasm is something done to me, not something I get myself, and that HE should be touching my clit. Which is never done satisfactorily enough for me by another person, in my experience. Or, I feel like he isn't really making me come if he's fucking me and I'm touching my clit, because I'm doing the action that will put me over the edge, while he's just helping. I guess I need to change my approach. I agree when you say "It takes a lot of confience as a woman to be able to make yourself cum while having sex, when you've always been told it should 'just happen'." I have a big problem with this; I'm still resentful that I can't come quickly and easily during sex in the first place. Which is silly. But lord I'm in a better place than I was a year ago, or even six months ago.

[0+] Author Profile Page sarah replied to jellyleelips :

I totally see where you're coming from.
I think that this idea that somebody else 'makes' us come is actually really not true because we can only come if we want/allow ourselves to.
Believe me, I was in a relationship for a year and never came during sex ever. Not once.Because like I said earlier, I was always under the impression that I 'should' only cum if it just happens, or if HE stimulates my clit, not me.

But think about it this way; if you were having bad sex, cumming from clitoral stimulation would be impossible.
If he was only 'helping you' you wouldn't be having sex with him in the first place, because you could do it all by yourself.
Sex is an experience in every way, and everyone doesn't come from the same kind of stimulation.

For a lot of us, we have to use our hand and it works for us and we shouldn't be ashamed of it.

And if a guy would rather you not cum at all then only cum with your own hand, then he doesn't have your best interest at heart.

Leave a comment


Search Feministing
Related Posts
Related Community Posts
Upcoming Events
  • Advancing Reproductive Justice
    Thursday, 12 November 2009 06:00 PM to 08:00 PM
    Three Peas Art Lounge
    Chicago, IL
  • The Annual Meeting of the Massachusetts Chapter of the National Organization for Women
    Saturday, 14 November 2009 09:45 AM to 01:30 PM
    Radcliffe Gymnasium at Harvard University
    Cambridge, MA
  • PROGRESSIVE SINGLE MINGLE a cocktail party for the left-leaning
    Thursday, 19 November 2009 07:00 PM to 10:00 PM
    People Lounge, in the heart of the Feminist District
    New York, NY
  • Transcending Boundaries Conference
    Friday, 20 November 2009 09:00 AM to 05:00 AM
    DCU Center
    Worcester, MA
  • Thinking Gender Conference (Deadline for Submissions is Next Week!)
    Friday, 5 February 2010 08:00 AM to 07:00 PM
    UCLA
    Los Angeles, CA

Recent Comments
Feministing As You Like It
Get involved with Feministing by joining our networks on:
Subscribe to Feministing