Well, this is good news. After community poster Gexx alerted us on Friday to Amazon's sale of a rape simulation game where not only does the player stalk and rape women, but force them to get an abortion, Amazon has now pulled the game from the site. "We determined that we did not want to be selling this particular item," said a spokesperson for the company.
However (and not surprisingly), the video game company, Illusion, is defending the game's right to exist. Their statement: "We believe there is no problem with the software, which has cleared the domestic ratings of an ethics watchdog body."
I wonder what fucked up, misogynist "watchdog group" that was.
0 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Quick Hit Update: Amazon Bans Rape Simulation Game .
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.feministing.com/cgi-bin/movabletype/mt-tb.fcgi/11987
"""I wonder what fucked up, misogynist "watchdog group" that was. """
Probably one in Japan, seeing as how the game was originally only supposed to be released there. *rolls eyes*
Sorry, but they're sorta known for that kind of thing. I hate to say it, but their society in general is very misogynistic.
Odd. When I emailed them I just got back a really hostile email informing me that they had never sold such a game.
That's...weird. I might e-mail them as well.
They did not sell the game. It was one of the Amazon Marketplace sellers so technically Amazon never stocked it. You can sell anything if you set up your own little Amazon shop.
Which is just fine, but they were pretty darn rude about it.
You should complain if you think their reply was improper.
well, being a former seller on eBay and considering Amazon.com/websites before choosing my own domain, like eBay , Amazon.com/marketplace will not allow waterpipes for " tobacco smoking" [ pot ] ; nor will they allow lesbian/other sex toys like vibrators.[ lesbian fashion accessories like bracelets, which I sell, are okay- but , like eBay, Amazon takes a huge chunk from your profits]
Then again, " Make War- Not Love" seems to be the modern philosophy behind this I'd think? Pot Pipes and vibrators being " bad" , but games promoting rape, stealing, war are all " good" here in the good ol' USA.
If this "ethics watchdog body" exists, wouldn't they name it, rather than referring to it in such a generic way? It's such an awkward mouthful.
The game certainly has a right to exist. And stores have the right to decide not to sell it, and we have a right to critique it and let Amazon know exactly what it is they're selling (especially since, if I remember the original thread correctly, it was an Amazon Marketplace item).
Not Amazon's sale, a vendor's sale. This is akin to eBay, where those who have accounts can put up most anything for sale prior to or without any vetting process done by the host.
The argument against the existence and ale of such material is sufficient w/o having to distort reality to make a point against it.
I also defend the game's right to exist. A lot of guys out there are rape fetishists. They have the right to every form of media they might want to excite this fetish through -- so long as they do not actually rape (or otherwise harm) people.
A lot of women have rape fetishes. I wonder if any feel marginalized by the storm this has brewed up on Feministing.
Well, as a woman who is into some types of violence/humiliation porn which may include contrived rape scenarios, I still found what I heard about the game pretty disturbing. Having read descriptions of it, it just sounds like it goes out of its way to be as graphic as possible (such as showing a bloodied penis) and I can't see it being a turn on except for maybe a very small, very twisted minority. One of the consistent features of porn from the BDSM community is that they're always very careful to show the actors in normal clothes/poses before and after a shoot, in order to give the disclaimer that 'this isn't real'. There doesn't seem to be much in video games (and I extend this to violent video games in general) to remind us that what you're seeing is neither real nor an OK way to behave in the real world. Anyway, I guess that's kind of getting on to another argument.
I think Seamster does have a point, and it takes bravery to address the taboo that is the rape fantasy (as held by both males and females). I agree that this game isn't going to make a normal person of regular intelligence go out and rape someone. I agree that you can have rape fantasies and be against actual rape, and be a completely non-violent, non-coercive person. However, in a society where the heinous crime of rape continues to frequently go unpunished, contributed to by sceptical attitudes as formed by the culture around us, we don't need anything that's going to make us take rape less seriously or, god forbid, 'see it as a game'. That's probably my main reason for wanting to see the game banned.
Tracker - I know what you mean about some aspects of Japanese culture seeming quite anti-women, and I can see how things such as hentai porn (depicting bondage, rape, women in pain etc) may support this. However, I may be going out on a major limb here, but I believe that fantasising about degrading women doesn't automatically make you a misogynist. If I want to tie up and spank my boyfriend, am I a misandrist? If I fantasise about dominating or hurting my partner during sex, does that make me a man-hater? No. It's just something I fancy in the bedroom. A man who would actually harm or sexually violate a woman is a misogynist. Someone who fantasises about it, or enacts the scenario with a willing partner - well, aren't they just being sexually honest which is something we're taught is healthy?
Also worth noting - Japan has a very low rate of sex crime, especially compared to the UK and US, and is renowned for its high level of public safety. Remember, this is a country where 5 year olds ride the underground quite happily on their own. So I'm really not sure we should be stating that their culture is any more harmful to women than ours...
Japan has a very low rate of *reported* sex crimes. They also have an extremely low conviction rate for the ones that are reported, and they reportedly take the rape victims back to the scene of the crime and make them do very triggery, humiliating walk-through reenactments of the crime to get the details down.
how do you know the crime reported does not accurately reflect the true crime rate?
I don't know the specifics about Japan but usually they do surveys (anonymous or some expectation of privacy) asking the general population if they've been raped, and then they compare those statistics to how many people typically report rapes. Almost everywhere you find that most rapes go unreported, but you can get different rates of how big the discrepency is.
I don't know the specifics about Japan but usually they do surveys (anonymous or some expectation of privacy) asking the general population if they've been raped, and then they compare those statistics to how many people typically report rapes. Almost everywhere you find that most rapes go unreported, but you can get different rates of how big the discrepency is.
Or they also ask "have you been raped and if so did you report it to the police" and that gives an even better estimate of how many people report or don't report their attacks.
"how do you know the crime reported does not accurately reflect the true crime rate? "
My head just exploded. D:
why?
This is something that's discussed a lot in feminist circles, college classes, etc, so I think some people are surprised that someone reading this blog wouldn't have heard of it.
Personally, I think its good to question statements like that that make no reference to the science behind them (in this case, the reference was assumed, but not everyone would know that).
At my school they used to put up signs saying things like "there were 5 reported rapes here last year, which means there were actually 25 rapes" -- which, sorry, no. Statistically it might be true that on average 1 in 5 rapes are reported, but that tells you nothing about a specific case when you get down to such small numbers. They should have said something like "on average 1 in 5 rapes are reported, so if 5 were reported last year that means its likely that there were around 25 rapes." I know people don't like putting complex arguments on signs, but the other result is that intelligent college students read the sign and go "yeah right, that doesn't make any sense" and discount the message.
In general, studies show that most rapes go unreported,and you can get more specific rates for various places and demographics. But it is useful to look at how they conduct the studies-- I know of at least one that was seriously flawed.
http://www.japantoday.com/category/kuchikomi/view/few-authorities-know-how-to-deal-with-rape-victims-in-japan
Http://www.aic.gov.au/publications/proceedings/27/dussich.pdf
"Rape victims are so poorly treated that there is no 24-hour rape crisis hotline, and the 1,948 rapes reported to police in 2006 are believed to be far below the actual number.
“Most of the clients I see won’t go to the police because of the way they are treated,” said Takako Konishi, a psychologist who assists female victims of violence at Tokyo’s Musashino University. “There is still a concept in Japan that women are responsible for putting themselves in bad situations, and women don’t want to risk criticism from their friends and family by going public.”
Some rape victims in Japan describe their experience with police as deeply humiliating. An Australian woman raped by an American serviceman in 2002 recalls being questioned for several hours without police providing medical care or an opportunity to shower.
They also demanded that she return to the scene of the crime to reenact the rape for police photographers, a standard Japanese police practice. Prosecutors would not press charges, but she won damages in a civil case."
http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:5duSkTTzEJsJ:articles.latimes.com/2008/feb/22/world/fg-rape22+rape+under+reported+japan&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=11&gl=us&client=firefox-a
Because it NEVER does. It comes closest for homicide, though.
the question was in the context of rape in japan, not crimes in general. bifemfatale's article addresses my questions head on.
not sure how much these sorts of games add to actually rapes, but the rate would have to be some 20 times greater to match that of the US.
Uhm, yea.......Japan is totally unique as the only patriarchal society EVER in which ALL rapes are reported. Sorry for the sarcasm.
Because it never does, when it comes to sexual assault, mainly due to the fact that in many countries there are low conviction rates, and the survivor, as a coping mechanism, usually goes into a mindset that it was their fault, etc. It's all over Rape Crisis websites. The true number can never be known.
Living here and having done a lot of study of modern society ...
On the surface you think that Japan is no more misogynist than any Western country. They've certainly come leaps and bounds in the past 10 years. But there are so many problems that are just so ingrained that it can be difficult to know where to begin ... well, how about the fact that it's still okay to weasel women out of the workforce?
The majority of women are just looking to get married, quit their job, and be housewives. That is still fairly normal here if you can manage it. Even just 20-30 years ago arranged marriage was the norm. It's a lot less common now, so it's much harder for people to find partners easily. A lot of SAHMs have expressed their frustrations to me because when the kid is old enough--about 7 or 8--they want to go back to work. But many companies have rules that they won't hire someone who's over 35. So the average woman in Japan gets married about age 27 or 28, she has a kid, she stays home for about 6 years until the kid's in 1st grade or so (let's assume she doesn't get pregnant right away, as they usually don't have kids until it's affordable), and then she's suddenly too old to get a job. Sorry. Also take into account that it is not customary still to change jobs (although becoming a trend) and most companies like fresh uni grads they can break and mold. It's truly screwed up.
And just personally ... in 3 years I've had 1 groping, 1 flasher, 1 guy trying to follow me home, 2 propositions, 1 stalker ... and did I "report" any of that? Of course not. What's the point? The Japanese police are highly ineffective at doing much of anything but giving directions. At the uni I had attended here some years ago, EVERY SINGLE WOMAN in my study abroad program had had something happen. One of my coworkers started having her underwear stolen and had a man standing out of their window poking them (the women) with a stick. Literally.
Men read porn on the train in plain view of everyone. Magazines and comics featuring photographs of barely-pubescent girls with their legs spread are on display next to the fashion mags. Cheating on your wife is considered A-OK as long as she doesn't find out about it. Marital rape and rape within relationships is just expected and par for the course. (Many women here report not liking sex one bit. Watch J-porn, where most men figure out how to do sex, and take a guess why.)
And so on. Rrrrgh. Sorry to go on at length, but it raises my hackles when someone presumes Japan to be so enlightened sexually because of a low rape rate. And just because a guy's not raping (in the traditional sense, because as I said, in relationships it's not considered rape) doesn't mean he's not acting out sexually, like flashing or groping or stealing underwear.
But I guess it's better than all these dudes going out and killing random people because of "stress."
It's the same in thing in Latin America. You have to put your picture on your resume (both men and women) and many times pretty, young people get hired over competent people.
Married women are routinely shunned from jobs. If they know you have a child, forget it. They think it means you are a bad worker.
Groping in the subway ... I never faced that. Buy plenty of whistling and dirty words even when I was dressed in a conservative suit (never mind if I was wearing more revealing clothes, then it was a given). It's not just women, my husband was groped on the subway but it is 95 per cent men doing it to women. Sometimes I'd take the female only subway train to avoid having to ignore some asshole.
Thank you for posting this.
I'm pretty impressed by the way you articulated your self. When i read this beginning article i was disgusted
"I think Seamster does have a point, and it takes bravery to address the taboo that is the rape fantasy (as held by both males and females). I agree that this game isn't going to make a normal person of regular intelligence go out and rape someone. I agree that you can have rape fantasies and be against actual rape, and be a completely non-violent, non-coercive person."
that is a great point, and i applaud you for being so brave to say something like that.
I'll never understand the defense of hate propaganda. Freedom of speech used to defend speech which is intended to limit other peoples' freedom just boggles my mind.
I could also defend its right to exist, but I would still feel weird for it to be sold via Amazon or eBay. I wonder if any of its keywords had it coming up when searching for rape/abortion counseling?
I also wouldn't blame this entirely on Japan ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Custer's_Revenge ) though I do think Anime offers a good deal of unhealthy gender roles on its own. There are always exceptions, but I can't help but see it as a genre where it's widely *enjoyed* by women, but designed for manchildren.
Yeah, is it fair for me to say I wouldn't censor it completely but I don't want it on Amazon? Maybe its because I'm not aware of Amazon having any safe search settings, so a kid could easily come across this game. But then, they sell erotica books already, so maybe they do have safe settings that I haven't noticed.
I'd rather have something like that sold on its own website, so you have to specifically go looking for it in order to see it.
What about all the other pornography you can find through Amazon or Ebay (not directly, but through people who have shops through Amazon Marketplace? I'm talking hentai tentacle sex and rape. I found La Blue Girl and many other video titles similar to that with a quick search.
I don't know what Amazon's policy is on that. I was asking if they have some sort of safesearch settings for kids? I guess the idea is that if you're shopping there you have a credit card and are thus 18, but its not like its hard for kids to access. Most websites with porn make you click a little box saying you're 18, which, obviously is very easy for kids to do, but at least then they know the site is not for them.
I don't think they have a "safe" setting (but neither do the other online book retailers I know, you can find anything from Playboy to erotica with a quick search). Which is why it's different from the old-fashioned magazine hidden behind a sleeve. In a traditional store, you'd have to go to the porn section and the magazine is partially hidden. But when it's not a brick and mortar store it's different.
Also, anime specific stores are a lot safer. For example, if you go to Anime Wild it asks for your age if you want to browse their porn section.
"There are always exceptions, but I can't help but see it as a genre where it's widely *enjoyed* by women, but designed for manchildren."
Anime really isn't a single genre, since different shows are aimed at different audiences.
Unfortunately, games such as these are not uncommon in mainstream culture. Grand Theft Auto, Colonel Custer's Revenge, and lots of other games. Hell, I even heard that someone created an online sex game similar to Sims.
I would like to see this game banned on he grounds that too much crap exists already that promotes misogyny and gender dominance through rape and violence. I know we live in a country where everyone is entitled to their own opinion (even if we disagree and their opinion is wrong), but freedom of speech shouldn't be used to promote misogyny, racism, and lots of other crap. OR at least removed from mainstream stores. Or if they're going to sell this game, put a warning on the box. Say at the beginning "this is only a fantasy; this behavior is not condoned in real life". Or put in another level on what would happen if it's ever done in real life.
No. Japanese Hentai games are very rare in Western mainstream culture. See below.
If we limit free speech to only things we want to hear or agree with, then it is no longer freedom of speech. While I don't agree, I know there are some out there who would say there's too much "feminist crap" already and any more should be banned on those grounds.
Freedom of speech, or at least the first amendment, actually guarantees the right to the freedom of religion without government interference, as well as the right to petition government to resolve greivances relating to governmental politics. Unfortunately, it is often used to defend speech which, as I have mentioned earlier, is intended to limit other people's freedoms. Funny how that works.
It is not sold through mainstream stores. You can't buy it at Best Buy. It is a *very* rare occurrence to find hentai games outside of Japan in a mainstream environment. In this case, it wasn't sold through Amazon but through an Amazon store where anyone can sell anything they want, which is why it happened.
Japanese hentai games do have warnings on the box. They generally have the rating and these specific type of sex games do not occupy the same shelf space as say Super Mario. Hentai games (or eroge if you want to go by the Japanese term) are akin to pornography.
We are not used to seeing hentai games in Western countries, specially an extremely offensive game such as this one.
However, lets not think that these games are regularly imported and sold in Wal-Mart.
Also, lots of hentai movies are still available through Amazon which begs the question, what to do about that? Unlike the magazine rack, where you put the pornography behind a paper sleeve, the Internet has no virtual sleeves. I can find cooking books as easily as tentacle porn through Amazon or other big Internet retailers.
A lot of people are also sexual aroused by other terrible things. Like child abuse. Is that ok to sell in video game form?
Maybe child rape? Or posting an image of your 8 year old daughter and imagining having sex with her? Or maybe your neighbors daughter/son? "Real Live Incest/Lay Fantasy," or something that could be similarly titled. Or maybe they could make one in which you kill your minority neighbors whom you hate because 'they' (you know what I mean) just moved into your neighborhood and now you've got all this pent up rage and want to take it out? Take their pics (from a friendly photo they sent you during the holidays of course) and post their pics in the vid game and shoot away! Or those damn homos that moved next door.....
yeah...there should be some limits
Oh no! Even games like Grand Theft Auto shrink from killing children. Killing prostitutes, though, is fine. Cause, you know, it's not like they can kill you back in the game, right?
Therefore, raping women in games like Rapelay is fine. That's just fantasy, after all! But killing children? Now, that's going too far!
I wonder if Rapelay included a scene where the main character tortured a puppy in between the sexual assault, if everyone would finally get upset. Because animal abuse rates are probably very low in Japan. And animal abusers need a safe outlet. No, check that; they have a RIGHT to an outlet for their fantasies. They're entitled. Never forget that.
"Oh no! Even games like Grand Theft Auto shrink from killing children. Killing prostitutes, though, is fine. Cause, you know, it's not like they can kill you back in the game, right?"
You can kill pretty much any non-player character in the game, and yes, the prostitutes can beat you down and kill you, just like any other NPC. There are the same penalties for killing them as there are for any other pedestrian. It's an immature game, with obvious moral issues, but aside from the cartoonish view of the sex trade there isn't any specific encouragement to kill prostitutes
Is it OK to sell rape/abuse/incest pornography in any form? Look, Rapeplay does not spring from a vaccuum. There's tons of hentai in movie form and numerous mangas that feature bondage, rape stuff, tentacle sex, etc. (For that matter, there are also Western websites that cater to that kind of pornography, but lets stick to Japanese animated/cartoonish porn).
Should ANY type of pornography that includes rape scenarios be banned? Even if it is Japanese hentai/mangas which are populated with animated characters? Because this type of video game fits squarely in a broader niche, in a broader category of pornography.
I can see where our culture could say that videogames effect our youth today. Wouldn't it make sense that after playing this game, a younger person who could potentially get their hands on it might find it a little more okay and a little less evil and wrong?
I think the effect to which games (let's focus on video games) affects people's opinions and morality is extremely complicated. It could depend on: the content and presentation of the game, the state of mind of the person playing (are they impressionable?), and/or other influences in their life (Do their parents condone/condemn similar behavior, etc.)
So, until I see statistics linking video game playing to real life actions, I'm going to lean on the side of "no, violent video games probably don't make the average young person think violence is more acceptable in real life." [Hate might be a more slippery issue and I don't know a lot of psychology]. The main reason I think this is: people should be able to categorize "games" as things not necessarily representative of reality. Furthermore, if the 'message' in a video game conflicts with another opinion a young person has come into contact with, what would make the video game more persuasive?
Well, obviously you're more up on the culture than I am and have more first-hand experience. I was just trying to address Tracker's comment that seemed to single out the Japanese for being 'sorta known for that kind of thing'. I suppose I was trying to say that I don't see Western Europe or the USA being shining paragons of right-on pro-feminist societies by comparison. I also acknowledge that the statistics often don't match the experiences (very much the case in the UK). I was mostly trying to address other issues in my post though and seemed to have inadvertantly caused a whole thread on rape reporting versus actual experiences, with my last little comment. Oops.
I really don't support censorship in any way- not only is it philosophically problematic, but it doesn't work practically. However, I think Amazon did the right thing. What they did is akin to self-censorship; they're not stopping this gaming company from selling it's game, they simply are refusing to be the outlet through which it's sold. I'm a huge advocate of self-censorship. Simply because something's legal doesn't mean it should be done. These gaming people should exercise decency and quit selling the game.
Now here comes the rant:
I don't care who it appeals to or why. The psychological damage it does to rape victims just by existing overrides any supposed-benefits it has for 'rape fetishists,' or, as I like to call them, people who need psychological help. Call me close-minded or what-have-you, but I don't condone any mind-set that views harming others as a positive... even if it's 'just' a fantasy. We need to take responsibility as human beings to be healthy and caring, not indulge our perverted fantasies of hurting others. Even if you don't want to take this responsibility, you should not sponsor a company that sells your fantasy; keep it in your mind and don't let anyone make a profit off of it.
/rant
We're all subjective, none of us are unbiased. We are all coloured by our experiences as our race/gender identity/sex/class/non-disability/sexual orientation, and we will never truly understand what it is like to be anything but what we are. And that is okay. That's why opening up to other viewpoints and listening to what others have to say exists.
So I really wish people would not be shut out as 'sex-negative' for having judgments or for criticizing things such as this. There is no such thing as the holy, freedom-loving, perfect feminist who gets everything right and has no biases for or against certain things ever.
I do not see you as close-minded at all for your rant.
im both a rape victem and a rape fetishist. Theres a huge difference between getting turned on by rape and getting turned on by simulated rape. Its something akin to BDSM with those involved getting off on the power play. Im not saying that people who buy this game are the same way, but they arent all mentally fucked up.
Actually, now that I've read more of the comments, I have to say I agree with wiccaman: this shit isn't even legal. It's hate speech. And I'd be more than glad to see it banned.
Lol, oh my god. One giant facepalm at these threads. This is why I'm so disengaged with third-wave feminism.
Yes, you can defend the game's right to exist. No one should be banned from making anything in the realm of fantasy. However, there is nothing wrong with people pressuring companies to not sell the games.
I already said (and proved with sources) in the other post about this that anyone who says video games have no effect on real life is either ignorant or dishonest. There are more links to video games and aggression increase than there is to smoking and cancer.
Also, the term 'rape fetishist' is ridiculous. Stop trying to shut out discussion by pretending that for some reason fantasies exist in a social vacuum, that come out of an impervious void. Fantasy is not off limits to some of us, thankfully, from critical thinking.
It doesn't mean I'd ever make someone go to jail or suffer for a thought crime, that goes against my beliefs entirely.
It does mean that these things are not off limits for criticism.
Things being a 'kink' or a 'fetish' does not mean they are off limits. At least to me. Thoughts luckily can be prevented from carried out in reality, but reality affects thoughts, and simulated reality can, too. I'll take researchers, experts, and scientists words on a subject that they thoroughly evaluate over a random person shouting "but I play GTA and I don't kill people!", missing the point entirely.
If we pathologize and medically prod at those who have suicidal and homicidal fantasies, proclaiming them unhealthy, then rape fantasies should not be off limits, either. Neither should child molestation fantasies.
However, if someone gets caught with rape porn that involves no real people, or shota/lolicon manga where young children are having sex with adults, does that mean they should go to jail or even be charged in my eyes? Nope. I don't think they should pay a legal price for actions that do not involve real people at all.
But I will still turn over their 'fetishes' in my head, and my opinion doesn't always have to be "It's your choice, and choices are good, therefore it's feminist and free for you to be playing this rape game!"
Thank you for posting this, well done.
I would argue in the game publishers defense if it werent for the fact that one of the victem charecters is a child, appearing to be no more than 13 years old. Theres even a choice of raping her in her pink and white bedroom, with dolls and teddy bears galore.
this is disgusting, even my 87 year old mom just said " why do they allow them to get away with this?" when I read the story to her. But, I guess just like that other game I never saw the sense in, Grand Theft Auto whatever; the "creators" based in deep intelligentsia [ " penis-brained testosterone theory"???]say they have their right to sell this piece of shit game. Wasn't one of the objects in Grand Theft Auto 3 to kill the prostitute after having sex with her? [never liked any of those video games really besides lady pacman].
They will argue " freedom of expression" , but maybe parents had a very valid point when they wanted violent video games like these BANNED! both the ' rape game' and 'GTA' being something which I think would be banned in such truly liberal societies as the Netherlands and Sweden; as would the " Hitler Holocaust Games" in Germany! oh well, welcome to the USA, a capitalist society, based on profit margins; where "money talks and bullshit walks", as they say.
"Wasn't one of the objects in Grand Theft Auto 3 to kill the prostitute after having sex with her? "
Nope, you COULD do that as with any other character, but that the media was obsessed with it has nothing to do with any "goals" in the game.
But the fact that it was even an option is the problem, regardless of the semantics of -how- it came into play.
thanks y'all for the company's name and shit. they[ software illusions] just got one fucking hell of a nasty , feminist fuck you, E-mail from me!
Cheryl Lynne Oropal
www.illusionstudios.com is the RIGHT COMPANY , not the one I e-mailed as well as many here- www.softwaresolutions.com . the dude at the latter company , Mike, said that they've been getting many angry e-mails and asked me where I heard it on this site. I apologized for both myself and everybody else and explained that women, and most sensible guys like him; would have to admit that the game was sick.
As for the right company? well I contacted them asking about that game, Rapelay; saying that I was " interested in buying it for my teenage daughter whom wanted it for her next birthday." A little sassy sarcasm, perhaps, true; but it just may be the best way to drive home the point and score a big win.
Ms. Cheryl Oropal
I am. disgusted.
"RapeLay?" Oh, jeez! Japan has always been tripple steps ahead with its perversions! This is really disgusting! But I was pleased to read here: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,525228,00.html
that Japan has decided to ban rape simulation games.