This is a couple of years old, but just too good to ignore. The Gunn Brothers - a devout duo that produces Christian films - created this masterpiece, The Monstrous Regiment of Women. The title really says it all.
You'll see in the trailer that our favorite female misogynist Phyllis Schlafly kicks things off with her wisdom on feminism, saying the movement tricks women into thinking that they're being victimized. (You know, like women who only think they've been raped by their husbands!)
A couple of other titillating teasers:
- That Hillary Clinton's decision to have one child means she has no sympathy for stay-at-home moms
- Sexual assault in the military means women shouldn't be in the military to begin with
- "Loose"-dressing women shouldn't be surprised they're perceived to be "loose" (my response here)
- The Quiverfull argument that we're children haters for not being willing to offer our uteri to harbor God's army
Can't wait for my copy! By the way, you must see the website banner. Classic.
0 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Why this didn't win an Oscar is beyond me.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.feministing.com/cgi-bin/movabletype/mt-tb.fcgi/11528












well actually it did win a award it was the "Best of festival" at the San Antonio Christian Film festival.
So...I only think I'm a victim? Good to know. I'll tell everyone in my life who's ever hurt me that they're off the hook.
People who work for Abortion Clinics want girls to get pregnant and have abortions? Really? So THAT'S why they handed me all those condoms and told me how I could get free birth control, because they wanted a repeat customer.
Where on earth did they get the statistic that sexually active young women between 13 and 19 have three to five abortions? I was pretty sure the statistic was something like 43% of women at age 45 have had at least one abortion.
Yeah, none of it really makes sense. I know plenty of women who were sexually active during those years and either didn't get pregnant or had a baby, but none got abortions. Even one. Myself included.
Always use a contraceptive if you don't want to get pregnant ^_^ I've always figured that abortion would be my backup birth control if I ever got pregnant when not wanting to, cause I always use contraceptives. Isn't that how places like PP teach young women? Or did I just dream that up?
It's exactly how Planned Parenthood educates. That abortion is a last-resort-measure. They teach young men and women about contraception and safer sex practices but say "IF you get pregnant you have options."
When I went to a clinic when I needed an abortion, there were signs in very nice frames all around the waiting area saying something like "You DO have options. If you are pregnant, you can go through adoption, parenthood, or have an abortion. Please talk to your friends, family, or one of our counselors about your options."
In my opinion, Planned Parenthood and Women's Clinics do more to prevent unwanted pregnancy than "pro-lifers" do any day.
On a different topic though, I stay at home (due to disability) and make the best home-made cookies in the world. Does that mean I'm approved by these people?
I've been sexually active since I was 17yrs old and I've never had an abortion. I must really skew their mythical statistics.
And this is why I sincerely believe that feminism and the Abrahamic fairth are destined to conflict. Say what you will of these poor, deluded, self-loathing women, they read their Bible.
I almost can't believe something like this actually exists. From the website:
"Starting with the infamous 16th century essay written by the reformer John Knox against the reigning female monarch, the Gunn Brothers find plenty of application to America’s political landscape; where feminists vie for every possible office including the presidency."
God DAMN those feminists! Someone stop them before it's too late! I mean, for the love of all things good and holy, they're trying to become president now!! It's almost as though they think that they're... that they're... EQUAL TO MEN!
It's just too ridiculous to get upset at, but it's a good laugh
Yeah, but I think I'm going to cry...:/
Ridiculous yes. Too ridiculous to fear...maybe not. This is up there with the time my mother told me I couldn't use tampons because only "sex perverts" use them. Fortunately, even the average 12 year old (ahem, even the below average 12 year old) can generally see this crap for what it is.
This has me steaming! The fact that these two men feel that they have to create a film that speaks to women about their history and future is one of the most upsetting things to me. this is not a new concept and i doubt that it will ever fully stop within my lifetime, but i do hope to hear from more women and men about how this is patrichary at its finest! This is why i also have constantly questioned faith of all kinds and what they say about women!
I have also been sexually active since i was a teen, but i never once dealt with abortion or STDs because my amazing mother decided that it was up to her to educate me about options i had other than abstaining until marriage.
The website is a nightmare! I'm not sure why but this has actually upset me to the point of tears but it did also remind me of why I'm prusuing a gender studies minor. i've got a lot of work ahead, clearly!
holy fucking shit.
Umm.. Stacy McDonald, author of "Raising Maidens of Virtue," (which made me laugh out loud in my office and I'm totally going to the library to see if I can find it) sort of confused me. When I wear a sexy outfit, it's because I think I'm sexy and want to feel that way. It doesn't mean I want to have sex with anyone who looks at me.
I don't believe in a god, but if I did, I'm pretty sure I'd think she thinks I'm sexy, too.
So where's the lie?
Okay, I just clicked "Play," saw it was Phyllis Schlafly, and decided it wasn't worth my time. GRRR to that one.
And just to relish a little in some of what tried to occur with Rick Warren on Tuesday....
http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/stories.nsf/education/story/D00F2F30B4689B3A8625744B00821014?OpenDocument
That was an interesting article. My personal view is that it is not appropriate to turn your back on a speaker, but I'm not going to hold it against people who do, I just haven't really made up my mind on it yet. Schlafly was so irritating, though, when she was going on about how the people who expressed disagreement with her weren't mature enough to get degrees...and blah blah blah bullshit about how women need to respect the homemaker role (while it seems like this is the ONLY role SHE respects for women). In any case, I will never complain about my own schools' honorary degree speakers again! And one of my schools had a speaker who rambled for over an hour when she was only supposed to talk for no more than ten minutes, so that's saying something :)
I'm 63 years old and I've been hearin Phyllis Schlafly since I was in my 20's. I woud just like to say - Phyllis Schlafly, sit down and SHUT UP!
Oops, I meant "hearing", not "hearin"
nothin' wrong with a little southern 'g' droppin' ;)
Haha, did you notice their sidebar? Hate 'male.' Oh, so clever!
And listen to the description of their other film:
"The Gunn Brothers take you to Shaky Town to show you a history of Christian persecution including fire bomb attacks, threats, legal assaults, and now, more recently, a mayor who attacks the Christian institution of marriage.
You'll hear testimonies from Christian Heroes involved in a front-line battle against immorality in the so-called “tolerant” city. You'll also see real video footage of Christian churches in San Francisco being attacked by violent groups of homosexuals. So be warned, this movie is not for the faint-hearted!"
Ok first of all... GodTube? hahahahahahahahaha
Also, I'm pissed at the idea that only having one kid means you hate children. I would really, really like to have a second child but I'm currently choosing not to because I don't think I have the monetary and emotional resources to support a second one without severely impacting my existing son's quality of life. Damn near every minute of every day, the smallest to the largest decisions, I'm taking my son into account. But no, apparently I hate kids because I've only got one. Amazing.
I also found the only child comment from the video clip to be birth order discriminatory. As an only child, this seems to be a common sentiment that having one is somehow something negative.
Seriously. "You hate children, because you choose to focus your time and resources on raising the one you've got, rather than creating more that you aren't sure you can handle!"
This made me throw up in my mouth a little.
And geez, the one lady only gave us two options for dressing-- maternity clothing or slut uniform. That sounds familiar..
Let's play "Name That Monster" in the website's banner:
Hillary Clinton, ????, Barbara Boxer, Mary I, Mary I again.
Why is Mary I in there? She wanted and tried (unsuccessfully) to have lots of kids, she was a hardcore Catholic, and she obediently allowed herself to be used as a political pawn by her father. What could they possibly have against her? Was it simply because she was a queen and wielded power? Because she killed Protestants, perhaps? But, seriously, you'd think this group would be down with good old-fashioned pro-patriarchy Papists.
Never mind. I went there.
From the site's FAQ:
"What is the Monstrous Regiment?"
"This title is based on the essay written by John Knox in the sixteenth century in which he admonished the reigning female monarch. We use it now for our documentary admonishing women and men for their role in the unbiblical practice of feminism."
Okay. So Knox was criticizing the existence of queens in England.
"For who can denie but it is repugneth to nature, that the blind shall be appointed to leade and conduct such as do see? That the weake, the sicke and impotent persons shall norishe and kepe the hole and strong? And finallie, that the foolishe, madde and phrenetike shal governe the discrete and give counsel to such as be sober of mind. And such be al women, compared unto man in bearing of authoritie. For their sight in civile regiment is but blindness; their strength, weaknes; their counsel, foolishnes; and judgment, phrensie, if it be rightlie considered."
I notice the Monstrous Regiment website also has an FAQ that asks, "Does this movie hate women?" "No, we love them, we just want them to be servile."
Given that they base their title on a document that pretty much says women are everything bad, I say they're lying through their teeth.
See, if they were going to after a Queen for being a woman with the audacity to try to actually, y'know, do her fucking job right, they should include Elizabeth and Victoria.
Elizabeth would not have been amused.
Nancy Pelosi is the 2nd woman
Thank you!
I feel stupid. I should've known that.
California, represent!
Oh boy- the woman in the abortion indstry right after Shafly talking about how the abortion industry's "goal" is for girls to have MORE abortions. I'm getting a little twitchy from watching this.
And somehow Hillary Clinton is evil because she didn't want to "stay home and bake cookies" ?
ugh.
Read the comments from people who bought this drivel..../barf
I would really like to think that at least some of those are fake, but I guess I'm just too cynical to believe it.
Metabonbon - the redhead on the far right is Elizabeth I not Mary.
The fucking gall of people who are deeply invested in violent, hate-driven religion to refer to another group, any group, as "monstrous" really just takes the cake.
Ugh. That is all.
FINALLY a movie to put those uppity women in their places.
I mean honestly, all of this equality and excess leadership by women is really making the men suffer.
OH and I hate children. Clearly.
(But then I remember that there are people who really buy into this shit, and that I'm probably related to some of them)
Well damn. What a shame letting my uterus go to waste. My husband and I don't particularly want kids so I guess this makes me less of a woman. And god forbid I wear an outfit that makes me feel good and shows off some boobies. Please. I'm an intelligent human and can make decisions for myself.
I'll be sure to dedicate menopause to these lovely people.
I know girls who are being raised Quiverfull and this is one of the few movies they are allowed to watch (it won a prize for best Christian movie one year and is promoted by conservative Christian groups).
Their parents and their community really believe every word of it. To them it's happy proof that they are right in keeping their daughters from going to college, since they are to be 'keepers at home'. It also lends them to encourage 'courtships' (read: arranged marriages, basically) when they come of age, at which point they are ready to be submissive to a father-approved husband instead of to their daddy.
Oh, and Phyllis Schafly flying around the country being paid big money for book deals and speaker engagements, working full-time to tell other women they shouldn’t work outside the home? That one should just speak for itself.
That makes me really sad.
I would like to see a documentary exploring the ways girls are raised in quiverfull families. I would like for everyone to see how limiting and conniving their environment is and how abusive it is. They are breeders, and thats it. Its like an animal farm, but for humans.
I can't for the life of me understand why they have a picture of Mary I of England up there. She was a devout Catholic, and so desperate to have a child that she had two false pregnancies that made her the laughingstock of Europe. She also tried to change her will so that her husband, Phillip II of Spain, would inherit the throne of England after her.
Idiots.
Well, Mary I (or, "Bloody Mary") was loathed by many of the Protestants. Extreme Protestants especially hated her. Actually, at that time in England, a lot of the anti-catholicism was coupled with misogyny. A Catholic wife was seen as a women who would emasculate her husband; the Pope was often depicted as female. The colourful vestments of Priests was seen as effeminate. Catholics undermined marriage by valuing celibacy more, and allowing women to escape marriage to convents. This was some of the standard anti-Catholic discourse in Knox's circles.
Of course, Knox was also horrified that Elizabeth was taking the throne after Mary. He firmly believed that England would become weak, and fall apart under these authoritative Queens. (Regarding Phillip II, remember that he wasn't crowned King. This meant that Mary, in Knox's viewpoint, wasn't subservient enough to her husband because she had more power than her husband in England). Knox was agitating for a male King.
I think we need to remember that sovereign Queens really threw Renaissance folk on a mind-trip. How could they accept a Queen as monarch (who was head of the state and head of the church), while still subjugating women in the rest of the country?
Anyway, I'm just horrified that these people are using John Knox as a guide for how to live today. Those poor women must really be self-loathing to be able to read things like Knox and accept it. I mean, even in Elizabeth's and James' time, women (and men) did respond to misogynist texts with outrage.
Bleah, sorry for talking for so long!
No need to apologize, I thought that was interesting.
Ha, where is Sarah Palin on the website banner? Oh, and they also forget Margaret Thatcher, who happens to be American right-wingers' favorite welfare state-killing, conservative British prime minister. I'm sure it was all an unintentional omission.
Oops--hit the "submit" button too quickly. Phyllis Schlafly supported Palin.
The Monstrous Regiment of Women is totally my new band name.
Christ on a cracker! 3-5 abortions?!?
Haven't any of these women listened to their own advice. How dare they take time out of their domestic duties to talk to a camera crew or have jobs or earn PhDs?!?
Damn straight. Why dont they (along with "Dr." Laura) shut the fuck up go back to the fucking kitchen, go brain-dead and bake cookies all day! These twits need to take there own advice.
Pratchett's The Monstrous Regiment is such a good feminist-themed fantasy book. Sadness.
I was just going to comment that aside from my rage at this in general, I'm most upset that this piece of trash shares ANYTHING with Pratchett's book - let alone a highly-recognizable title.
Makes me want to kick someone in the socks.
Pratchett would have named his book after Knox's essay for irony's sake, so I think if he knows about this movie, his toes are probably curling with glee.
Well, it makes a nice contrast, at least. Maybe more people will find the book, do search for "Monstrous Regiment" or something? Convert them to the Pratchett-y ways!
It makes me want to make them to read it. Then the sock-kicking. :D
Pratchett's book sounded right up my ally, so I typed it into the search at paperbackswap.com. Another title came up, "A Monsteous Regiment of Women" by Laurie R. King, a mystery in a series about a female apprentice of Sherlock Holnes. It's apparently a popular title.
Make that "alley."
In the website's FAQ the last question is "Is this movie suitable for kids?" Answer: "We advise you to view the film before showing it to children." Why? "It contains subject matter in regards to abortion, sex and IMMODESTY."
At least they warn folks beforehand. You strive so hard to keep your little angels away from places like schools & supermarkets where they might be exposed to miniskirts or women in trousers, and what do you know, even when you just want to relax in front of a nice self-affirming Christian film, you're confronted by immodesty. Jesus, Mary and Joseph, there's just no escape these days.
I love how people make the assumption that if they only show women saying all of this shit, then it can't be criticized as sexist or hateful towards women.
I'm pretty that was exactly their plan.
Or maybe they're very open about calling themselves sexist, I don't know.
Oh also,
"Feminists often argue that if you're going to have children at all, only have one..."
WOW, really?!
Somehow I've managed to miss that feminist argument.
To be fair, that's an argument often put forward by environmentalists, and the two movements do intersect.
Their idea that it's somehow "hateful" to have only the children you feel you can support, rather than spreading yourself thin having a dozen, is just ridiculous.
Gee, I was ALMOST impressed. I thought that they had taken the Puritans' language and used it in an innovative way, but, as usual with these imaginatively challenged people, they just lifted a title from an old Puritanical piece of patriarchal propaganda, the original full text is available at Project Gutenberg: , and it was written in the 16th century, 1558, by John Knox.
From Knox's Preface: "I am assured that GOD hath revealed unto some in this our age, that it is more than a monster in nature that a Woman shall reign and have empire above Man."
It is all about men trying to keep power. Women who help them are stupid. Hear that Phyllis? STUPID.
Umm…what I want to know is why these women are allowed to be talking in the interview? Don't they know that by taking the time for this movie they're neglecting their poor family by doing this?!?! And since when did they think that they could have opinions? And why aren't they making babies right now? And where do they get the idea that they can wear pants? Those harlots.
yah know, i agree with the woman about society's hatred of children because there are lots of elements in society that making parenting and working and parenting and being fully participating citizens extremely hard. daytime curfews, piss poor maternity and family leave requirements, the fact the government is much happier spending money to send its children out to die than to improve schools, "family" restaurants without changing tables (or they are only in the women's restrrom. just a personal pet peeve).
but i cant think of one of those things feminism is responsible for. in fact feminism has tried to help many of these.
I don't have a child because I simply can't afford one right now. OTOH, if I get myself into a more financially stable position, one child is all I'm going to have because it's easier to provide for one child. I'm conflicted about having a child for other reasons as well, but I'm not going to get into that here because I've seen enough posts on feminist websites that cover those topics. Anyway, according to these religious fundies, any decision I make would be the wrong one anyway do I could care less what their opinion is anyway. One thing for sure, if I have a child it will be through a sperm donor, and that alone, will give make these people pitch a fit. I really could care less.
wow this video just really hurts to watch. i know they are ignorant bigots who hate women, but it just makes me sad for the world and for women who have to live under doctrines like this. when that "quiverfull" woman talked about how the world hates children, I just had to laugh. almost as ridiculous as the statement about the number of abortions sexually active women have. these people are insane!
I just thought that someone should point out the last review they have posted on their review page--the one from "Harriet Wimpleton"--is pretty obviously a spoof.
That they include a link to her blog, which is even more clearly mocking, suggests that they may be irony illiterate....
PRICELESS. I almost feel like cluing them in.
Yeah, scroll all the way to the bottom and you'll see:
"*if it isn't obvious already, this is a satirical blog."
Oh Phyllis. She came to speak at my college a couple years ago courtesy of the Republican Club. My friend and I duct-taped our mouths shut, wore aprons, bought like 4 baby dolls, held mixing bowls, and sat in the front row with signs that said "happy now?", "shit, i should be in the kitchen!". We told my friends mom and she was like "That lady is STILL going at it? SHUT UP already Phyl!"
oops, I just threw up in my mouth a little.
See, if women think that feminism is bullshit then it really must be!
arggggggg!!!!
I wonder if John Knox was around to see Elizabeth I turn England into the most powerful empire in Europe for centuries--and know its biggest threat, Spain, out of contention forever.
Second, the Gunn brothers show their moral bankruptcy by calling female leaders "monstrous" just for being female when history is full of male leaders who are clearly "monstrous."
So, it's all right if you starve your people, commit genocide, set up prison camps and crush political opponents just to stay in power--as long as you're man? Kim Jong Il and Robert Mugabe are not monstrous? But a democratically elected woman who's just doing her job is? Alllll righty....
This video is disgusting, and the scariest part of this message is that people are actually listening to it.
Yet, a little bit of hope: on the reviews page, one of the only people they could get to comment on it is the husband of one of the women in the actual 'film' who says, "If I must say, my wife's interview was great!"
There will always be a minority of skewed individuals (outliers in a bell curve, if you will) in a free-thinking nation like ours, unfortunately. However, we can take solace in the fact that they are a minority, and the woman's place, despite their protests, is no longer restricted to the home.
In response to their accusations, the woman can remain in the home IF THAT IS HER CHOICE. If being a homemaker is what she truly wants to do with her life, that is up to her, and as feminists we can respect that. What we can't respect is society *telling* women that the *only* place for them is in the home. I for one am so proud that people like Betty Friedan and Hillary Clinton taught me that I could be what I want to be, not what someone else tells me I *should* be.
Somebody needs a nap.
OK. That's enough out of you. Reporting.
Troll is gone - thanks for heads up!
This pisses me off as much as it pisses off the rest of us fab feministing-ers, but let me throw one thing out there.
I'm from a sickeningly traditional family. My mom has a masters in accounting - and has been a stay-at-home mom since I was born (and I'm the eldest). I promise, I get many of my feminist values from her - her advice to always see beauty on the inside and not prioritize it, to always have dreams, to never plan life around marriage, to be ambitious, to punch back HARDER if ever punched.
So let's remember that the feminist haters around here are the ones in this God-awful (yes, I said it!) film - not necessarily the housewives they wish to be the role models of all women.
Some of the stuff on there actually makes sense. Isn't feminism support ALL women, whether they want to be modest and God fearing or Atheist and "slutty"?
I've seen so many things on here stating that you have to agree "x" in order to be a feminist. Doesn't that go against feminism??
But not all women are feminists. Many even say so. I could think that someone deserves equal rights without agreeing that they are a feminist as well.
Supporting someone's decisions doesn't mean you have to agree with them on anything.
I was pretty sure the statistic was something like 43% of women at age 45 have had at least one abortion.
Online High School Diploma | Accredited High School Diploma | Online High Schools