More evidence that "post abortion syndrome" doesn't exist
Researchers out of Johns Hopkins University shows that there has been no reputable study done that can show having an abortion causes mental health or emotional distress or the existence of a "post-abortion syndrome."
The researchers also noted that efforts to show that the syndrome does exist are politically motivated. (You don't say!)
Thanks to Janet for the link!
Related: The answer is no, "post-abortion syndrome" doesn't exist.
0 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: More evidence that "post abortion syndrome" doesn't exist.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.feministing.com/cgi-bin/movabletype/mt-tb.fcgi/10749












Duh!
Sorry! We both posted on same article twice. Took the other one down. Have got to get better about refreshing my browser window! Sorry bout that.
Blech. Comment gone. :(
Well since my computer crashed, I wonder if my post ever got published. I was wondering if the depression these flawed studies tout was more due to the victim-blaming, the lack of compassion, the judging, and the finger-pointing that many women who want an abortion face. It seems that they want to instill a guilt-trip into the woman and I am wondering if that is where the depression comes from.
Perhaps the religious right has created a sense of self-prophecy here...guilt-tripping women into depression and then touting it as oh abortion causes depression...
Well since my computer crashed, I wonder if my post ever got published. I was wondering if the depression these flawed studies tout was more due to the victim-blaming, the lack of compassion, the judging, and the finger-pointing that many women who want an abortion face. It seems that they want to instill a guilt-trip into the woman and I am wondering if that is where the depression comes from.
Perhaps the religious right has created a sense of self-prophecy here...guilt-tripping women into depression and then touting it as oh abortion causes depression...
OMG, ucsb... I could not agree more. I wonder if anyone has done studies to prove that other medical procedures -- say, apendectomy or setting a broken bone -- can also sometimes be accompanied by depression? Since when is having to go to a hospital/clinic for ANY procedure not kind of scary and mood-altering?
Oh wait... but no one was protesting your apendectomy. And chances are you didn't have to hide it from a disapproving family member or employer, or make up a fake illness to justify time off so that you wouldn't feel judged. No, an abortion procedure does not cause depression. Shaming, blaming people and a society that polarizes a personal medical issue quite possibly can.
I'm sure there are many medical procedures that cause depression- mostly anyone that makes you limited in your mobility for a period of time. That can be really depressing! But, of course, since these are usually considered necessary procedures, there's no political debate as to whether or not you should have them. Though, I wonder if anyone suffers depression from things like plastic surgery...?
I'm sure there are women who get depressed after an abortion, but those are linked to their own issues about abortion/kids/family etc. that would have existed even if the procedure hadn't been done. To claim that the act itself causes depression is silly.
I posted the same article in my blog and got a comment from the editor of LifeNews.com.
*Snort*
He tried to convince me that other studies exist to "prove" that abortion is, in fact, linked to depression. Hm, I wonder who funded the studies? I wonder why only LifeNews.com has published these studies and not MSNBC?
Religious wackos rarely let silly little things like truth and facts get in the way of a good con job.
Just because you find it hard to believe that no one ever would become depressed following an abortion does not make you a religious wacko.
No, but conducting a poorly executed, scientifically unsound study to further your own bigoted, sexist, religiously motivated agenda certainly does.
"The researchers also noted that efforts to show that the syndrome does exist are politically motivated. (You don't say!)"
Gee, and the same cannot be said for this study as well? Probably a bit politcally motivated as well. You should not commit the genetic fallacy of dismissing an argument because you do not like the source.
How about some outrage over the practice of forced abortion? How many unborn girls are killed in China and the world because of abortion? And the fact the President-elect Obama will restore funding to organizations that help propagate forced abortions. I would like to see some criticism of that.
This is a blog. It does not purport to neatly and clearly show rage/happiness/a reaction to everything ever in one post. Jessica et al have blogged about the reproductive situation in China before, and are highly likely to do so again.
As for "genetic fallacies" (I don't think that means what you think it means), the fact that no reputable study has, oh, EVER found a strong enough trend to back up the idea of a "syndrome" related to abortion means something, whether a wingnut wants it to or not.
Also, citing as your source a personal blog post that cites itself and a wingnut website as proof of - well, I don't know, because you just kind of run yourself into a circle of concern-troll and "omg pro-choice = forced abortions for all!" - is not really effective when trying to change the opinions of, say, people who think.
Do tell, do you have any outrage to share with us about forced pregnancy?
This is a blog. It does not purport to neatly and clearly show rage/happiness/a reaction to everything ever in one post. Jessica et al have blogged about the reproductive situation in China before, and are highly likely to do so again.
As for "genetic fallacies" (I don't think that means what you think it means), the fact that no reputable study has, oh, EVER found a strong enough trend to back up the idea of a "syndrome" related to abortion means something, whether a wingnut wants it to or not.
Also, citing as your source a personal blog post that cites itself and a wingnut website as proof of...
Do tell, do you have any outrage to share with us about forced pregnancy?
How exactly does name calling make your argument more powerful? It seems an indication that one is loosing an argument when they have to resort to such tactics.
Would you ever "accept" a reputable study that said there was such a connection between having an abortion and serious long term consequences? That seems like a more important question and yes, I know what a genetic fallacy is.
As to my blog, follow the links there to other souces, like writing an article, so maybe you have issues with them.
Your last comment morally equivocates between two radically different situations. Comparing forced abortion or people who are forced to do abortions to a pregnancy does not work. By this statement you seem to back up my initial critique that Liberals want to force their views on others even those who do not want to do abortions. Why can't you tolerate someone not wanting to participate in an abortion? I see little moral difference between forced abortion and forcing someone to do abortions.
And please someone answer this question: If you do not want the baby, then why not give it up for adoption?
The end result is the same. If you do not want to be a mother to your child, then at least let someone else be a mother and father to the baby.
I see little moral difference between forced abortion and forcing someone to do abortions.
With forced abortions, it's the right of the woman to make decisions about her life and her body that is being violated. It's a violation of her right to personal autonomy and bodily integrity. These are also the rights that are at stake when it comes to forced pregnancy.
Forcing someone to perform an abortion is a violation of their freedom of conscious. However, the exercise of such a right impinges on the woman's rights described above. If there was someplace else that was easily accessible where one could obtain an abortion, then this wouldn't be a problem. But it is.
And please someone answer this question: If you do not want the baby, then why not give it up for adoption?
1) You still have to go through 9 months of pregnancy, during which time you would not be able to go about as though you were not pregnant. It would take up time away from work or school or other commitments. It alters your mood. It effects your health. It alters the way people relate to you. It is no small imposition on a woman's life.
2) If a woman is with an abusive partner, pregnancy means that she will face a greater risk of violence. One's partner might insist that you not give up the child, and use the child as another lever of control.
You seem to be missing the point. Maybe these women that have forced abortions are really more depressed about the FORCED part, and not some supposed chemical reaction to having an abortion. I think that's a very different situation that generally saying "abortion causes depression". If someone forced me to do anything, I'd have a much more negative reaction than if I had chosen to do the same thing of my own free will.
Do you need a study to prove that having an abortion can cause emotional distress?
It would be ridiculous to claim that no women ever have abortion-related mental health issues.
The right is trying to pathologize abortion and that's not good, but this is just as bad in the other direction. I would be offended that an organization like John Hopkins is claiming to have a monopoly on knowledge about the mental health of women.
If one of my friends were to have an abortion and were suffering distress from the experience, should I say to her, "You know, there's no statistical proof your distress is real"?
I am 100% certain that some people get depressed after an abortion. That doesn't mean they have a syndrome. That's where the pathologize part comes in.
Well said.
Yes, but according to Jessica's post they are denying the pathology (good) but also denying any mental distress:
"no reputable study done that can show having an abortion causes mental health or emotional distress or the existence of a "post-abortion syndrome."
I don't think we disagree, I just want to point out that it sounds like we're taking it a little too far in the opposite direction of pathologizing abortion-related mental health problems.
I think "no reputable study done can show" is shorthand for there exists no evidence of a significantly strong statistical correlation between having an abortion and having resulting mental health issues or emotional distress, not that there exists no woman who has ever had an abortion and suffered resulting emotional distress.
Exactly.
You're arguing in circles> "Post-abortion syndrome" means that there's a depressed condition that is linked directly to abortion. It's not to say that no woman gets depressed after an abortion. It means that abortion in and of itself doesn't CAUSE depression necessarily. Scared young pregnant women are often told that if they get an abortion, they'll get depressed and kill themselves.
Danyell,
I made the distinction to which you are referring. The OP stated:
"no reputable study done that can show having an abortion causes mental health or emotional distress or the existence of a "post-abortion syndrome."
If I'm understanding the use of "or" correctly, the OP said that no study shows abortion causing emotional distress.
I'm perfectly happy with the conclusion of "no post-abortion syndrome."
you know what else is probably often accompanied by depression?
being raped and having to carry the child to term.
giving birth to a child you can't afford to take care of.
being forced to give up your child for adoption.
dying as a result of pregnancy complications.
In my experience, finding out you have an unwanted pregnancy is far more traumatizing than an abortion. It would appear that if one were to be traumatized from finding out they were pregnant, and/or deciding to have an abortion, and/or the abortion its self all of those negative feelings would hit AFTER it was all said and done. Thus, a post-abortion syndrome wouldn't necessarily be caused by the abortion even if there was evidence that it existed.
To be fair, this is not "More evidence." This is simply referring to a review of the "already existing evidence." One could say that it "confirms that 'post-abortion syndrome' is a politically motivated myth" but there's no novel studies being presented here. Just a rehashing of the work that's already been done.
This is also a little misleading. The article specifically says, "long-term mental health." Yet when it was transferred to this site Jessica simply wrote "mental health distress."
I find it a little easier to stomach that there are no long-term mental health effects, but the way it was presented here made it seem like women are not troubled at all after experiencing an abortion and that women who have depressive episodes after an abortion are statistically invisible.
Hey, has anyone here ever found getting an abortion to be a positive experience?
When I found out I was pregnant, I felt horrible. I kept crying, I felt guilty, dirty. My boyfriend and I had already decided that if I ever was to get pregnant, I'd have an abortion, and he would pay any expenses. Even though I was pro-choice, I had been raised Catholic, and gone to a Catholic school, and there was this little niggling voice at the back of my head, telling me that what I was going to do was wrong. I stayed at my boyfriend's place, hiding from my family, until the day of my appointment.
When I got to the clinic, I was a little surprised at the diversity of people there. There was a teenaged girl in a hoodie wearing a nose ring; a couple white middle class women, one with her husband and one with her mom; a very slight, young looking Chinese girl with her Chinese-gangsta boyfriend; a South Asian woman whose husband was waiting outside with their kids; and a Muslim girl with an older man who I assumed to be her father - he did all the talking for her - both very traditionally dressed. To be in the same room with so many different women, all of us going through the same thing... it was kind of neat. I chatted with the South Asian woman for a bit, she had just had a baby and had gotten pregnant again right away, and had too many kids to deal with.
The nurses and doctors were great - professional, but supportive. Before the procedure they asked if there were any religious or moral issues I wanted to discuss, and I said no. I got two different kinds of pain killers, a shot of morphine and laughing gas, but it still hurt a lot. But it was short. In the recovery room the nurse was very friendly, passing around cookies and giving recommendations about birth control options. They had these pecan cookies that were really good.
I was buzzed for the rest of the day. Not just on the drugs, but on relief. I felt a hundred times lighter. My boyfriend, who had been concerned and supportive the entire time, had been waiting for me in the lobby, and he told me later that while he was waiting, he was thinking that he's going to be doing a lot more worrying in waiting rooms in the future, when we do decide to have kids. He said that the way we had gotten through the experience together proved how strong we were as a couple, and that we would make good parents one day.
So it wasn't really a bad experience at all. I felt connected to the other women in the clinic. My relationship with my boyfriend really grew and strengthened. And I got some fun drugs. I'm not saying that I'd want to get an abortion again. But I do feel that it has positively effected my life.
Hey, has anyone here ever found getting an abortion to be a positive experience?
When I found out I was pregnant, I felt horrible. I kept crying, I felt guilty, dirty. My boyfriend and I had already decided that if I ever was to get pregnant, I'd have an abortion, and he would pay any expenses. Even though I was pro-choice, I had been raised Catholic, and gone to a Catholic school, and there was this little niggling voice at the back of my head, telling me that what I was going to do was wrong. I stayed at my boyfriend's place, hiding from my family, until the day of my appointment.
When I got to the clinic, I was a little surprised at the diversity of people there. There was a teenaged girl in a hoodie wearing a nose ring; a couple white middle class women, one with her husband and one with her mom; a very slight, young looking Chinese girl with her Chinese-gangsta boyfriend; a South Asian woman whose husband was waiting outside with their kids; and a Muslim girl with an older man who I assumed to be her father - he did all the talking for her - both very traditionally dressed. To be in the same room with so many different women, all of us going through the same thing... it was kind of neat. I chatted with the South Asian woman for a bit, she had just had a baby and had gotten pregnant again right away, and had too many kids to deal with.
The nurses and doctors were great - professional, but supportive. Before the procedure they asked if there were any religious or moral issues I wanted to discuss, and I said no. I got two different kinds of pain killers, a shot of morphine and laughing gas, but it still hurt a lot. But it was short. In the recovery room the nurse was very friendly, passing around cookies and giving recommendations about birth control options. They had these pecan cookies that were really good.
I was buzzed for the rest of the day. Not just on the drugs, but on relief. I felt a hundred times lighter. My boyfriend, who had been concerned and supportive the entire time, had been waiting for me in the lobby, and he told me later that while he was waiting, he was thinking that he's going to be doing a lot more worrying in waiting rooms in the future, when we do decide to have kids. He said that the way we had gotten through the experience together proved how strong we were as a couple, and that we would make good parents one day.
So it wasn't really a bad experience at all. I felt connected to the other women in the clinic. My relationship with my boyfriend really grew and strengthened. And I got some fun drugs. I'm not saying that I'd want to get an abortion again. But I do feel that it has positively effected my life.
aw, crap, double-post. sorry.
"Hey, has anyone here ever found getting an abortion to be a positive experience?"
Having at least two abortions that I know of, allowed my wife to conceal the fact that she had been having affairs, including getting pregnant one month before our wedding (in both cases she was unsure of whether those men or I were the father). This allowed her to preserve the image of a happy marriage, and me to be ignorantly happy not knowing.
I consider my wife's abortions to be positive, because her affairs and abortions coming to light allowed us to relate on a deeper level. I had naively believed I was marrying a near perfect woman, and that in being married, I was "keeping" my girlfriend. (Getting married at 28 was only my second "serious" relationship, and we taught each other about sex.) I've grown up some since then. Decades of marriage and raising children is not like the thrill of dating.
My wife, who is strongly influenced by post WWII traditional Japanese culture, considered marriage a business partnership, with her looking after the home, and the man (no one in particular) providing financially. Unknown to me in the early years of our relationship, my wife did not "love" me in the western or romantic sense, despite saying she "loved" me. (She and I also "loved" watching Japanese animation together while dating.) Seeing the marriage in jeopardy made my wife reevaluate how she felt about our relationship, and me. She realized she had her own reasons for being with me. I allow her to stay or go at her discretion. She had more money than I did before we were married, and due to our circumstances, she has at least three times the assets I do (Japanese bank accounts are not held jointly; she has "her" money saved for herself and the children. "My" money was spent on living expenses and my education.).
Ironically, I'll bet the same folks who are convinced Post-Abortion Syndrome does exist are the same folks that are convinced PMS and Postpartum depression don't exist.
Haha, good point! The postpartum one especially, because how could a woman EVER be anything less than overwhelmed with joy after giving birth? Babies! More babies! I like babies!
YMMV but the only thing that distresses me mentally about my abortion is how other people treat me once they know I've had it.
I have had more than one abortion and I was deeply miserable after each one. Having said that, I don't see the need to make a syndrome out of it. I had upsetting experiences and was very sad afterwards. Sadness is a normal human reaction to upsetting life events, especially ones that convention forbids sharing with your family and friends for fear of condemnation.
Despite the sadness I experienced, I am glad I had a choice. Carrying an unwanted pregnancy in difficult circumstances would not have made my life easier, more pleasant or happier. Those who think that forcing women to carry an unwanted child will somehow make everything alright must be living in cloud cuckoo land.
But you know, even if a study was one day to definitively show there was a causative link between abortion and depression, it wouldn't constitute an argument against abortion. It would merely indicate a need for more counselling and support. It's normal in the UK, for example, to offer heart surgery patients counselling and support because many suffer depression during the recovery period. Nobody is arguing against heart surgery however.
If you do not want to be a mother to your son or daughter then why not adopt to someone who does?
The end result is the same, you are not responsible for bringing up your child so your life will not be inconvenienced by him or her.
Too bad there is that whole giving birth thing, which is very expensive and physically taxing. Why won't you, for once, care about the children already here? There is already millions of children in the adoption system that need good homes, and I find it cruel that someone would seriously think about adding another to that large number. Actually care about the children, in stead of trying to force women to suffer for being "sluts".
Too bad there is that whole giving birth thing, which is very expensive and physically taxing. Why won't you, for once, care about the children already here? There is already millions of children in the adoption system that need good homes, and I find it cruel that someone would seriously think about adding another to that large number. Actually care about the children, in stead of trying to force women to suffer for being "sluts".
Too bad there is that whole giving birth thing, which is very expensive and physically taxing. Why won't you, for once, care about the children already here? There is already millions of children in the adoption system that need good homes, and I find it cruel that someone would seriously think about adding another to that large number. Actually care about the children, in stead of trying to force women to suffer for being "sluts".
I care about the children out there as well. I find it hard to believe that justifying the killing of innocent babies does not help to contribute to child abuse out of the womb as well.
And it's not cruel to kill the baby boy or girl? A little perspective would be good here.
Where did I ever call anyone a name? Seems like all the name calling is coming from the responses to my posts. I am trying to better understand your views, but if you feel some need to call me names for then I can deal with it but please don't accuse me of something I've never said.
My only response to those who insist that women should only ever adopt, not abort, is this:
How many adopted children do **you** have?
So, blue collar, how many adopted children do **you** have? One? Two? Three? Ten?
Because you see, unless you're like the ONE and only person I've ever met who is pro-life AND has adopted children (lovely woman, actually, I adore her, she's also a foster mother), everything out of your mouth after "I can't adopt because of - " is bullshit.
Put your money where your mouth is.
My only response to those who insist that women should only ever adopt, not abort, is this:
How many adopted children do **you** have?
So, blue collar, how many adopted children do **you** have? One? Two? Three? Ten?
Because you see, unless you're like the ONE and only person I've ever met who is pro-life AND has adopted children (lovely woman, actually, I adore her, she's also a foster mother), everything out of your mouth after "I can't adopt because of - " is bullshit.
Put your money where your mouth is.
Let me probably surprise you in agreeing with that critique of those who say adopt and do not. That is a problem, one that will hopefully be corrected soon. And yes, my wife and are now in a position to adopt and we will hopefully have our first adopted child by the end of next year.
So the obvious response to this is then: If there are enough families wanting to adopt, then will you choose to adopt your unwanted child? And how inidicative is your response in the larger feminist community?
If there were 1 million families willing to adopt, could that translate into 1 million less abortions?
Honest answers would be appreciated.
no. if 1 million more familes were willing to adopt, we would have 1 million fewer children without parents.
1 million fewer abortions, without other corresponding changes (e.g. fewer unintended pregancies) = same number of children in protective custody. no net gain for society - the 1 million "saved" from abortion would simply displace 1 million other candidates for adoption. however, we *would* have 1 million more miserable women forced to gestate and give birth.
this abortionless country sure looks like a fuckin utopia.
sorry...what i meant is that, if both of your hypothetical situations were to occur (1 million fewer abortions, plus 1 million more adoptions) there would be no net gain for society. there would be the same number of children in protective custody, because the outcome of 1 million more adopted children is exactly cancelled out by the 1 million more children that would be generated by the 1 million fewer abortions.
forgive me; i'm slightly exhausted at the moment...
Let me clarify since I think you missed my hypothetical. I do not think there is a cancelling out. I'm saying that instead of the woman aborting her child, she gives it up for adoption, so that ought to have direct impact on the number of abortions.