http://web.blogads.com/advertise/liberal_blog_advertising_network
Liberal Prose BlogAds Network
Financial Times talks to Gloria Steinem

The Financial Times has an interview with Gloria Steinem if you want to check it out. Not-so-favorite moment? When reporter Chrystia Freeland (fully aware of the slightly ugh nature of the question) asks Steinem if she regrets not having children.

Posted by Jessica - August 04, 2008, at 02:47PM | in Feminism , Media

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Financial Times talks to Gloria Steinem .

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.feministing.com/cgi-bin/movabletype/mt-tb.fcgi/8366

9 Comments

[0+|0-] Author Profile Page demimonde said:

I really wanted to read this article, but Financial Times asked me to register to be able to do so. I realize that's not your responsibility, but is there some other version of this article to read?

"The New York Times talked to female students at Yale and found them to be mostly interested in becoming housewives."

Most of the female students at Yale want to be housewives? Why am I finding this so hard to swallow?

[0+|0-] Author Profile Page Rea said:

demimonde I also find it hard to believe that most of the female students at Yale want to be housewives.

[0+|0-] Author Profile Page bintie said:

(go to bugmenot.com to get a username/password for any site... in this article's case, just change the "false" in the url to "true)

Funny, nobody ever asks a woman "Do you regret having children?"

"Funny, nobody ever asks a woman "Do you regret having children?""
Heh, that is very true.

Even with that question in the mix, I enjoyed the article. I also liked how the interviewer noted how cautiously and carefully Steinem answered questions about sexism's role in Hillary Clinton's defeat, not because she necessarily should have to be but because this is a woman who has been around the block enough times to know that one verbal misstep and you're labelled for life.

And although I'm sure it has been mentioned other places before, Steinem's comment about how Clinton was praised after she admitted defeat was because society likes women who admit to failing and dislikes women who are successful was kind of like a lightening bolt "duh" moment for me.

[0+|0-] Author Profile Page Blue said:

"Steinem's comment about how Clinton was praised after she admitted defeat was because society likes women who admit to failing and dislikes women who are successful was kind of like a lightening bolt "duh" moment for me."

Interesting. That's the one comment in the article with which I took issue. She didn't specify who she meant was doing the praising that had been doing the criticising before. Obama and his supporters, of course, needed to criticize her while she was his opponent if they wanted to win the candidacy. But when your opponent cedes, what do you do? The right thing to do is shake hands, and say, "Good game." Also, Obama needs her out campaigning for him now that she is no longer his opponent, so he and his supporters should definitely play up her strengths at this point. That, to me, is the "duh".

I think she meant McCain more than Obama, and other news organizations and blogs. I'm sure she realizes that Obama had to criticize Clinton and now has to praise her in order to win.

[0+|0-] Author Profile Page Blue said:

I think she meant McCain more than Obama, and other news organizations and blogs. I'm sure she realizes that Obama had to criticize Clinton and now has to praise her in order to win.

Maybe, maybe not. Again, she did not specify. I would not presume to know the thoughts she did not fully express in words.

I think it's great that so many women have choices these days. It wasn't always so.

Many women are in the dark about how women won the vote - but now finding out is as easy as opening your e-mail.

"The Privilege of Voting" tells the sexy, shocking truth of HOW the suffragettes won the vote.

It is a new historical e-mail series that goes behind the scenes in the lives of eight well-known women from 1912 to 1920 to reveal the many exciting and surprising twists and turns that played into women finally winning the vote in England and America,

The women depicted include two of the most beautiful and outspoken suffragettes -- Alice Paul and Emmeline Pankhurst, along with Edith Wharton, Isadora Duncan, Alice Roosevelt, and two stunning presidential mistresses.

There are weddings and funerals, babies in peril, damsels in distress, war, peace, prohibition, broken hearts and lots of hot affairs on the rocky road to the ballot box.

The best part is it's ALL true!

Presented via e-mail in a unique, sequential, interwoven short-story format called Coffeebreak Readers that makes discovering the delightful heroines of women's suffrage history fast and fun!

Each action-packed e-mail episode takes about 10 minutes to read, so they are perfect to enjoy on coffeebreaks, or anytime.
You can subscribe to receive free twice-weekly e-mails at:

http://www.CoffeebreakReaders.com/tpovpage.html

I would be interested to hear your opinion on the series should you choose to subscribe.

Best to you,


Virginia Harris
Series Author
Publisher
www.CoffeebreakReaders.com

Leave a comment