http://web.blogads.com/advertise/liberal_blog_advertising_network
Liberal Prose BlogAds Network
Friday Feminist Fuck You: Rush Limbaugh

Inspired by a ten page article about Rush in NYTimes Magazine, I figured this was FU worthy. Rush has been spewing crap since I was a wee one and his frequently unfounded and baseless arguments are clearly constructed to be controversial, but actually affects public opinion. This is scary.

(I know I need to get a real camera.)

Thanks to George for the link.

Posted by Samhita - July 04, 2008, at 01:56PM | in Analysis , Friday Feminist Fuck You , Media , Politics

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Friday Feminist Fuck You: Rush Limbaugh.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.feministing.com/cgi-bin/movabletype/mt-tb.fcgi/7863

35 Comments

[0+]  MLEmac said:

DO YOU WANT ME TO GET UGLY!

Hah! love it.

[0+]  orchid said:

I'm sure Rush Limbaugh believes what he has to say is valid for shaping the culture just as you feel as strongly about what you have to contribute.

The fact that opposing viewpoints are available in the public marketplace of ideas is a good thing and one of the strengths of our open society. I don't think it is productive to suggest to those with whom you disagree to "shut up".

Because then you are advocating a less open society.

Although I agree with your politics more than Limbaugh's I will defend his right to utilize his forum to express his views.

Not only is it not "scary" but it is one of the fundamental aspects of American society that is worth preserving and fighting to preserve.

[0+]  sojourner said:

I vote for Samhita for funniest feministing vidoes.

[0+]  sgzax said:

Well Orchid, given that Limbaugh has been anointed with vast riches and a huge pulpit from which to spew his racism and evil I think "shut up already!" is a valid response. You'll note that Courtney is not trying to pressure the FCC to take him off the air, which is a tactic many conservatives have used against people they disagree with.

"Shut up Rush" is a wonderful and necessary expression of free speech in a society that has become less open simply because the very wealthy can afford to manipulate mass media in their own interests.

" feminism is just an ugly woman's......" what FUCKING ASSHOLE rush blowhard really is! as a transwoman, I can say that I still remember the few times, long before my transition back in florida; when I'd watch his show just to see what he had to say about liberals and bill clinton. I still remember his definition of " feminazis" being "those feminist women back in the 1970's whom wanted to do everything equal to men and not account for their feminity."[ something like that] anyway, I saw this guy as a fucking asshole back then- even through my period living as "M" of being angry and frustrated at women in general[the traditionally " feminine" ones only- I always respected EXTREME FEMINISTS and butch women, marching for abortion rights with NOW; and now know I hated what was inside me emotionally!]but I never can say I related to the power world of men, and this guy seemed then, still is- all about that. if he had his way, I feel that women would all be dressed in burkas and forced to obey their sheik husbands; just like in saudi arabia and all. come to think of it? I think I was angry at conservative " christian" women like those at " concerned women for america"; all whom are very anti-LGBT, abortion, and yes, rush's idea of " how a woman should act and be." I'm amazed this guy's still on the radio anymore??

[0+]  em said:

I completely agree with Orchids comment above. there is no reason to throw an immature FU to Rush Limbaugh just for doing what he does. Instead, how about writing some counterpoints of things that he says so that readers can be enlightened? in what ways are his arguments baseless? This video seems to be as baseless as anything that he has been saying.

I was really excited to find a 'feministing' blog but after having it in my reader and looking at it daily for the past couple weeks, all I can think when i click on it is "what now...". i thought it would be scholarly, educational, and mature...but I think you've lost a reader. Really...a friday FU?

[0+]  sgzax said:

Em, educate yourself on Rush Limbaugh. It isn't the job of this website to do so. Media Matters is a good place to go for an overview of his spew and the reasons it is objectionable.

Why should it be necessary for Courtney to legitimize racist spew by coming up with a point by point scholarly examination of why racism is objectionable? I assure you, Rush doesn't work that hard to produce his bile.

[0+]  sgzax said:

Sorry, I meant Samhita when I said Courtney. What a weird mistake.

[0+]  MLEmac said:

I never saw the friday fuck you's as necessarily being a forum used to debate as much as a forum to vent. They have been one of my favorite features of this site ever since they started for that reason. So often I find myself yelling "exactly" at my computer screen when the speaker hits the nail on the head of exactly how I'm feeling. Samhita, did make the valid point about how he should use his position responsibly. He should actually be making valid points instead of just spreading propaganda and making stupid racist, sexist jokes. Enough people take him seriously that he really needs to own up to his responsibility. The fact that so many people allow this idiot to shape their political views is just disgusting.

And by the way, comparing him to Jon Stewart is not a valid argument. Jon Stewart is on comedy central. He even said it himself on crossfire "the show leading into mine is puppets making crank phone calls!" (by the way, I do miss crank yankers....)

[0+]  ellestar said:

Instead, how about writing some counterpoints of things that he says so that readers can be enlightened?

When Mr. Limbaugh starts making rational and well-thought points to begin with, expect valid and rational counterpoints from feminists.

When he spews the equivalent of "feminists are ugly lesbians who need to get laid," I'd say a good "fuck you" is the perfect counterpoint.

in what ways are his arguments baseless?

Are you asking because you don't know, or because it needs explaining how calling feminism the vehicle for ugly women to get into the mainstream media is baseless? All that will come out of that is an equally ridiculous argument (but I'm pretty and I'm a feminist, but I know pretty feminists, etc.) that still aren't addressing the problems inherent in our patriarchal society.

So when some dumbass says stupid stuff on the air that a surprising amount of people unquestioningly believe, we get to call him on it and ask that he either get his facts straight or shut the hell up.

[0+]  waxghost said:

Am I missing something? I've never watched one of these before but the captions seemed really strange to me. Even if they are supposed to be sarcastically humorous, they seem to really undermine what Samhita is saying.

As for orchid's argument: comparing a short, one-time video by relatively-unknown Samhita (no offense! though I think you would say the same yourself, Samhita) and the weekly (daily?) radio emissions by a guy with the support of fame, millions of dollars and one of the few (and therefore gigantic) media corporations left in this country is laughable. And the suggestion that Samhita saying "fuck you" and "shut up" is somehow silencing Rush Limbaugh is even more ridiculous.

Haha, nice FFU.

To those who wanted a "scholarly and educational" experience... it's a Friday Fuck You. Samhita got the job done when she said: "Fuck you Rush Limbaugh for consistently putting out racist and sexist commentary and playing it off like it's political punditry."

She's not trying to rid of conflicting ideas and free speech, she just wants Rush to stop being an insulting douche bag.

[0+]  nutmeg said:

AMEN Samhita!!!

Unfortunately I was stuck on a 12 hour car trip with my conservative mother while she was listening to Rush...everytime he spoke I twitched. He's offensive, and racist, and sexist. I ran out of power on my Zune and bam...I was stuck. He makes no legitimate arguments or even ones that have a basis in fact. He claims to be able to debate the points of anything he brings up but in actuality he cuts off callers and spews the same crap to every argument. He deserves every Fuck You I can find in me...he is part of the reason that so many refuse to call themselves feminists...because they are ugly, ball-breaking, man-hating women...he perpetuated the term Feminazi so far that that is what so many hear instead of feminist. If he were stating his honest political opinion then that would be one thing but he spews hate and bigotry...he gets all the fuck yous that he can get.

[0+]  nerdalert said:

...I thought that pretty much everything the Feministing women post on this site was a counterpoint to Limbaugh's "arguments?"

And haven't we tried being nice for a long time now? You get a pat on the butt as a thank you, and you're usually worse off than when you started.
Fuck you Rush Limbaugh!
Rock on Samhita!

[0+]  Alice said:

I don't think there's anything wrong with telling Limbaugh to shut up, but come on, it's Limbaugh. When a feminist blog makes a video about how Limbaugh is sexist, I half expect the next post to be something like, "This Just in: KKK Found to Support Racist Policy!"

[0+]  GopherII said:

I second:

FUCK YOU LIMBAUGH!!!

[0+]  GopherII said:

" Instead, how about writing some counterpoints of things that he says so that readers can be enlightened? "

Yaaaaawn.....Hows about saying it like it IS to an already enlightened forum? Seriously, if youre listening to "Rush" you've got a looong way to go before even being open to anything other than his propoganda. I hardly doubt a nice, sweet couple of pointers would turn any of the Rush fascists around.

"Really...a friday FU? "

When is a feminist fuck-you NOT appropriate?!!I dont hear enough!!

[0+]  kave barney said:

Besides being a little sleepy, I found the FU to be hilarious.

Trying to "debate" with the likes of Rush is beyond the pale, about the only thing you can do is roll your eyes and say FU.

[0+]  orchid said:

Yeh, sure you can tell RL to shut up if it makes you feel better. If all you want to do is shout a FU to someone whose politics you find disgusting in an echo chamber - knock yourself out.

But, it won't change anything.

It has limited usefulness.

And if you really do want people like RL to be silenced, then I don't support that kind of suppression of speech.

That was my point.

Yes, RL has a huge pulpit. And I would hope that the Feministing.coms of the world would achieve the same kind of presence.

But, it won't to the extent you spend time venting FUs.

[0+]  waxghost said:

According to your own definitions, orchid, you are suppressing Samhita's freedom of speech.

I absolutely want people like Limbaugh to be silenced. But there is not just one way to silence someone, like you're trying so hard to say there is. I want him to lose the support of the masses, of money, of radio stations. I want there to be an actual choice between left and right viewpoints on the radio, and to not have the rightwing viewpoint be things like calling people "feminazis". That will silence him too.

And no, this isn't useless. Even if it is just preaching to the choir (which I don't believe), the choir needs to be preached to too. To suggest otherwise is to completely ignore the importance of support from people who believe similarly in a world that is very hostile to us.

Even soldiers get breaks. Give us a break too.

Ugh, I listened to Bob Garfield interview the reporter who wrote the NYT piece yesterday on On the Media and the reporter was being totally disingenuous. Garfield kept asking him pointed questions about the sort of things that Rush says, and the reporter would just beg off saying "oh, I don't know about those things."

You wrote a ten-page piece on the New York Times Magazine and you didn't bother researching his more controversial statements?

He also liked to beg off saying it was sarcarm or irony or opinion.

Rush Limbaugh said that the Native American populations are doing better now than they were when Christopher Columbus intially landed. This is a flat-out lie--Rush is not trying to pass it off as irony, or sarcasm, or opinion, he's trying to pass a flat-out lie as fact. And that's just one example of his dipshittery.

He was the template from which the likes of Bill O'Reilly, Sean Hannity, Michael Savage, etc were created. He is reponsible for the complete breakdown of political discourse in this country. He deserves the hearties Fuck You that we can muster.

[0+]  isabel said:

Excellent video, as usual. But I have one qualm:

I'm a feminist. I don't suck at math.

Unless, of course, that subtitle was supposed to sarcastic and I somehow missed it. If that's the case, then disregard this comment.

[0+]  GopherII said:

waxghost,
Exactly!

Everyone who is against feminist fuck-yous,

Do you think Rush puts out 'little pointers' boxes? Of course not! He comes out rambling bullshit and ends up gathering an audience with it! Feminists need all the rallying and reinforcement we can generate. Rush has a money army behind him, and blog feminists dont. Perhaps those that think a 'fuck-you' is inappropriate shouldnt call themselves feminists, or at the very least should gather some ovaries and come back later when youve got some.

[0+]  GopherII said:

"He is reponsible for the complete breakdown of political discourse in this country. He deserves the hearties Fuck You that we can muster."

Yeah!

Q: What's the difference between Rush Limp-Balls and the Hindenberg?

A: One is a flaming Nazi gasbag and the other is the zeppelin that exploded.

http://daltonator.net/durandal/blog/?p=74

I see Jesse Helms, another racist radio broadcaster kicked the bucket a couple of days ago. C'mon Grim Reaper! Don't let me down!

[0+]  AlaraJRogers said:

Are you asking because you don't know, or because it needs explaining how calling feminism the vehicle for ugly women to get into the mainstream media is baseless? All that will come out of that is an equally ridiculous argument (but I'm pretty and I'm a feminist, but I know pretty feminists, etc.) that still aren't addressing the problems inherent in our patriarchal society.

Or, you could respond by saying "Well, but that's only fair, because patriarchy was the means by which fat, ugly men like Rush Limbaugh got into the media. Obviously we either need more fat ugly women for balance, or we need to get rid of the fat ugly men the media already has, like Rush Limbaugh."

I mean, it's *RUSH LIMBAUGH.* He has no call to be talking about *anyone* being ugly or fat (which he considers synonymous; I do not, however, he qualifies as both.) If a trim, fit, hot young man on the media starts talking about ugly women, then you're kind of in a bind, yes, because all you can say is either "Yes, but some feminists are pretty" or "Fuck you, who cares if women are pretty or not if they have something to say?" But it's RUSH LIMBAUGH. When fat ugly men shoot off their mouths about feminists being fat and ugly, doesn't the response write itself?

[0+]  SarahMC said:

I am so sick of being told that, as feminists (or progressives in general), we must always take "the high road" and have an endless amount of patience for hypocritical, bigoted liars like Limbaugh.

This whole site is a calm, rational response to Limbaugh's (and those like him) ridiculous, insulting proclamations.

REALITY proves him wrong.

The point of the FFFU is not to win an argument. It's to blow of steam and have a bit of fun. Jesus.

I love these Fuck Yous. And I think Samhita is totally within her rights to say what she likes to that racist scumbag. You rock.

[0+]  flyinfur said:

Limbaugh's schtick is one long FU. He exists to shut feminists, liberals, and idealists down so that patriarchy may thrive and privilege remain undisturbed.

So why object when someone sends a little back at him?

So why object when someone sends a little back at him?

DITTO!

[0+]  CalliopeJane said:

Orchid, perhaps you should go to the "Finally, A Feminism 101 Blog" at http://finallyfeminism101.wordpress.com/ if you need enlightenment on why RL is wrong and why we don't feel the need to go into that here. Begin with the "Where to Start" stuff in the right hand column, starting with "Why was I sent to this blog"

[0+]  Kaylee said:

Here's one feminist that doesn't suck at math. However I have been imitating the "math is hard" Barbie for quite a long time now. :-)

Agreed on the other points that it would rock if Limbaugh would STFU. Or at least do *some* research and *attempt* some journalistic integrity. Sadly he's paid an obscene amount of money to blow it out his ass and won't likely change any time soon.

We don't have to apologize for our anger. Maybe people telling us to shut up and do more research (As if we could?) should be the subjects of a friday fuck-you?

[0+]  jen said:

I would like to second that "fuck you, shut up" shout-out to Rush, as well as send one along to Orchid.

Go ahead, whine about how I don't have the right to try to silence you, and praise Rush's right to silence feminists everywhere.

Liberal-claiming hypocrites amaze me.

[0+]  puckalish said:

oh, come on, sami's li'l bad-at-math quip was tongue-in-cheek... y'all know it... though sami is definitely kinda bad at math, but she knows it's not 'cos she's a feminist, it's 'cos she dedicates her studies to other subjects...

anyway, i just want to regurgitate the point that no one should have to complain for venting... tell rush to shut up! as far as trying to convince him to shut up through research - it ain't gonna happen!

"If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it." -goebbels pointing out that the truth don't matter if the lie is pushed hard enough.

fuck rush. and fuck these rush apologists... and fuck-yeah to "fuck you fridays" it brightens my motherfucking day!

i also want to echo the sentiment that, coherent or not, sami's are my favorite fff's!

Leave a comment


Search Feministing
Related Posts
Related Community Posts
Upcoming Events
  • Advancing Reproductive Justice
    Thursday, 12 November 2009 06:00 PM to 08:00 PM
    Three Peas Art Lounge
    Chicago, IL
  • The Annual Meeting of the Massachusetts Chapter of the National Organization for Women
    Saturday, 14 November 2009 09:45 AM to 01:30 PM
    Radcliffe Gymnasium at Harvard University
    Cambridge, MA
  • PROGRESSIVE SINGLE MINGLE a cocktail party for the left-leaning
    Thursday, 19 November 2009 07:00 PM to 10:00 PM
    People Lounge, in the heart of the Feminist District
    New York, NY
  • Transcending Boundaries Conference
    Friday, 20 November 2009 09:00 AM to 05:00 AM
    DCU Center
    Worcester, MA
  • Thinking Gender Conference (Deadline for Submissions is Next Week!)
    Friday, 5 February 2010 08:00 AM to 07:00 PM
    UCLA
    Los Angeles, CA

Recent Comments
Feministing As You Like It
Get involved with Feministing by joining our networks on:
Subscribe to Feministing