I'm pretty sure this piece was exhibited at the Brooklyn Museum in the Sackler Feminist Art Gallery, which opened about a year ago. The Global Feminisms exhibit that it opened with was AMAZING. Also, Damali Ayo has done some really brilliant and innovative work around race.

I think that this work is beautiful and fascinating, especially in light of the complex politics around exploitation of women's bodies, being biracial and being part of a biracial couple...it is interesting to think about what constitutes art versus exploitation, when expression is self-authored or imposed...any thoughts?

I would love to see this in person; it looks beautiful and powerful. I too, wonder about the politics of using one's body as art or expression. I'm thinking back to the Peta ads using women's bodies to make a point, which I remember getting slammed in this forum. What's the difference? In both situations, a woman is making a choice to use her own body to express a feeling or a viewpoint. Does calling one "art" make it acceptable from a feminist point of view? Full disclosure - I'm a Peta supporter who always felt that the Feministing analysis of their campaigns was superficial and too harsh. I'm curious to see the discussion about this piece in that context.