In the midst of all the Spitzer drama last week, Washington Post blogger Mary Ann Akers noted that Silda Spitzer had (gasp!) worn the same suit and scarf before. Um, who the hell cares? I’m sure next we’ll hear that her habit of wearing her clothes more than once forced her husband to turn to escorts.
The point was, ostensibly, to mention how much happier Spitzer was the last time she wore this outfit on television, but the tone strikes me as a little snarky. And very different from most of the other posts in the blog.
Thanks to Sunshine for the link.
0 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: OMG, she totes wore that outfit in public before!.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.feministing.com/cgi-bin/movabletype/mt-tb.fcgi/7061
This snark column was probably specifically written to rile up the masses to blog there. Don't fall for it.
To me it reminds me of advertising that is geared towards offending people since there is no bad publicity.
At least she didn't show up to the prom wearing the same dress as "Karen." Now that would be embarrassing.
And we all know that if she wore different clothing all the time she'd be shamed for the frivolous spending of wealthy women.
Well, then she obviously deserved to be cheated on.
*eyeroll*