Tested. Ready. Now. - Feministing

http://web.blogads.com/advertise/liberal_blog_advertising_network

Tested. Ready. Now.

Does anyone else see pictures of Rudy Giuliani in front of his campaign slogan:

...and think, so he's declaring to the electorate that he's STD-free and ready to jump in the sack? Maybe its just me with my dirty mind. But given the man's history, that's probably not so crazy.

Also, when I ran this theory by Jessica, she replied, "It actually sounds a lot like a blind date i had once." HA!

Posted by Ann - January 23, 2008, at 04:44PM | in Humor

Email post to a friend |

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Tested. Ready. Now..

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.feministing.com/cgi-bin/movabletype/mt-tb.fcgi/6717

14 Comments

Sad thing is, I totally wasn't joking.

Posted by Jessica

| January 23, 2008 5:03 PM

Can. I. Call. A. Moratorium. On. Using. Periods. To. Emphasize. Words. PLEASEFORTHELOVEOFGOD?

But I agree. Either that or he's about to launch some nukes. Someone must be on the rag! ;)

Posted by Human Bean

| January 23, 2008 5:46 PM

Human Bean- BEST. MORATORIUM. EVER.

Posted by Genetic_Mishap

| January 23, 2008 5:57 PM

I know he isn't a good person. Like, at all. And I still love one opponent who claimed every sentence of his consisted of a noun, a verb, and 9/11.

But still - why is sexism okay when it's coming from feministing and directed at a dude?

We see Ghouliani the way some people see Clinton, so why is it okay to jump on others for trying on their sexism schtick, but it's okay to give it a pass here?

Just saying there might be another way to draw attention to his general creepiness without jumping on the sexist bandwagon.

Posted by colddaye

| January 23, 2008 5:59 PM

Colddaye,

I agree. I also got an sexist, anti-men impression from the post.

It's disappointing because it detracts from the critically-important values otherwise espoused on the site.

Posted by sky

| January 23, 2008 6:09 PM

Oh please, how in the world is this sexist and anti-men? Come on now.

Posted by Jessica

| January 23, 2008 6:47 PM

I really have no idea how this post would be sexist and anti-men. It's just a more humorous interpretation of what Guiliani's slogan might (but obviously doesn't) mean.

Human Bean:
I wholeheartedly agreee with the moratorium for overusing periods for emphasis. It hearts my eyes!

Posted by Sarmar

| January 23, 2008 7:05 PM

Haha, that's totally what I thought upon reading it. I mean, that's the only way it's even coherent -- otherwise, he's just sort of listing adjectives that just happen too (allegedly) apply to him.

Posted by the_becca

| January 23, 2008 7:09 PM

er, and by "too" I mean "to." D'oh.

Posted by the_becca

| January 23, 2008 7:12 PM

Oops! I mean it hurts my eyes. The cold has rendered my fingers too stiff to type.

Posted by Sarmar

| January 23, 2008 7:12 PM

If clinton had that stupidass slogan I'd laugh at it too. not sexist or anti-man.

Posted by Kmari1222

| January 23, 2008 7:40 PM

I wonder if Giuliani's STD test was paid for with his infamous shag fund.