http://web.blogads.com/advertise/liberal_blog_advertising_network
Liberal Prose BlogAds Network
Girlfighting

A group of Irish women boxers are looking to participate in the Olympics, but skeptics are being douchey about the idea.

But former world flyweight champion Dave Boy McAuley, from Larne in County Antrim, has his doubts.

Flat noses, cauliflower ears and possible brain damage - it's a tough, rough sport, he said, and women just are not built for it.

...But to Dave 'Boy' McAuley, women boxing is a step too far.

"It is a tough, rugged sport, punches are not vitamins, women are not built to take that sort of punishment," he said.

Unless it's domestic violence of course. Sorry, not ok.

But Anya Norman, who works with the Irish Amateur Boxing Association, calls bullshit.

" Girls have not been out of boxing, they have had a pause since the 20th Century, we had female boxing in the Olympics in 1904," she says.

Norman hopes that the 2012 Olympics will step up...as do we.

Posted by Jessica - August 22, 2006, at 10:13AM | in Sports

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Girlfighting.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.feministing.com/cgi-bin/movabletype/mt-tb.fcgi/3831

9 Comments

[0+] Author Profile Page chem_fem said:

"It is a tough, rugged sport, punches are not vitamins, women are not built to take that sort of punishment," he said.

Rape, domestic violence, child birth womens bodies have taken much punishment over the years thankyou!

...

Nobody is built to take that kind of punishment. The error here is not in the statement that women shouldn't be boxing; it is in the implicit assumption that men should be.

Don't women already participate in professional boxing and kickboxing, wearing the same protection (none) as men? Don't they have their own mixed martial arts tournaments, as well as discipline-sanctioned full contact tourneys?

It's not as if they don't have examples out there...

Oh: What I mean by that is that restricting Olympic participation on the basis of safety is ridiculous in light of the other, existing, arenas for boxing.

Not to mention making "common sense" arguments about women's capabilities without any abstract data to back them up. You could substitute "boxing" in the claims made by these people for any activity, and find someone espousing that dumbass opinion.

[0+] Author Profile Page EG said:

Right. Because the sports women do compete in have no physical risks whatsoever. It's not like a slight mistake in a gymnastics routine can wrench a person's knee out of place and prevent her from ever walking again--oh, wait. It can.

Possibly this Irish gentleman has not heard of the sport of rugby.
Or perhaps he has never seen women play rugby.
Or perhaps he is being a twit.

[0+] Author Profile Page Yoko Tokinova said:

We all know stories of doll makers who magically make their pieces become living beings. In the real world, artists do not have that kind of fantastical ability. They do, however, work toward making their characters vibrate with life as much as possible with materials and process available or invented. They are ever on the alert for new technologies which will enable them to take you to new places and meet new people and ideas in their work. In the end, finishing the figure means endowing it with qualities that will engage the viewer and provide him with something to appreciate, think about, or even play with. Any well-done piece provides a surprise and the challenge to be understood, appreciated, or at least experienced by the viewer.

The part of the creative process where the artist interacts with the concept of character is unquestionably the key to creating a successful figure. What you see in the static figure is, for the artist, only a moment in the life and world of her imagined character. Although she only shows you an abstracted moment, in the artist's mind the figure exists as a total personality, with a life history and a unique environment. More artists are choosing to show these elements or parts of them in new, non-traditional forms and modes. This often brings us to a point where no lines of definition are possible. Nor are they necessary. An object does not have to be typed or named for engagement.
Artist Ellen Rixford has taken the traditional clockwork automata ideas and combined modern electronics to create figures that can show several aspects or moods of one persona. When she does that, is the result a doll, a mannequin, or a mechanical device? We don't have to know to be fascinated with the personality aspects it reveals as it moves.
All doll makers immediately recognize the element of doll-ness and, perhaps, an element of their souls in the work of Sha Sha Higby (below). She becomes the doll. Sha Sha literally makes it live.

[0+] Author Profile Page Yoko Tokinova said:

We all know stories of doll makers who magically make their pieces become living beings. In the real world, artists do not have that kind of fantastical ability. They do, however, work toward making their characters vibrate with life as much as possible with materials and process available or invented. They are ever on the alert for new technologies which will enable them to take you to new places and meet new people and ideas in their work. In the end, finishing the figure means endowing it with qualities that will engage the viewer and provide him with something to appreciate, think about, or even play with. Any well-done piece provides a surprise and the challenge to be understood, appreciated, or at least experienced by the viewer.

The part of the creative process where the artist interacts with the concept of character is unquestionably the key to creating a successful figure. What you see in the static figure is, for the artist, only a moment in the life and world of her imagined character. Although she only shows you an abstracted moment, in the artist's mind the figure exists as a total personality, with a life history and a unique environment. More artists are choosing to show these elements or parts of them in new, non-traditional forms and modes. This often brings us to a point where no lines of definition are possible. Nor are they necessary. An object does not have to be typed or named for engagement.
Artist Ellen Rixford has taken the traditional clockwork automata ideas and combined modern electronics to create figures that can show several aspects or moods of one persona. When she does that, is the result a doll, a mannequin, or a mechanical device? We don't have to know to be fascinated with the personality aspects it reveals as it moves.
All doll makers immediately recognize the element of doll-ness and, perhaps, an element of their souls in the work of Sha Sha Higby (below). She becomes the doll. Sha Sha literally makes it live.

Leave a comment


Search Feministing
Related Posts
Related Community Posts
Upcoming Events
  • Hell No! We Won't Go
    Thursday, 27 August 2009 05:00 PM to 09:00 PM
    Madam’s Organ
    Washington, DC
  • Activist Leadership Circle
    Wednesday, 9 September 2009 06:00 PM to 08:30 PM
    NARAL Pro-Choice New York
    New York, NY
  • Virtual Phone Bank to Elect Pro-Choice City Council Candidates
    Thursday, 10 September 2009 06:30 PM to 08:30 PM
    NARAL Pro-Choice New York
    New York, NY
  • Women & Power: Connecting Across the Generations
    Friday, 11 September 2009 08:00 AM to 12:00 PM
    The Omega Institute
    Rhinebeck, NY
  • Monday, 14 September 2009 06:30 PM to 08:30 PM
    NARAL Pro-Choice New York
    New York, NY






Recent Comments
Feministing As You Like It
Get involved with Feministing by joining our networks on:
Subscribe to Feministing