http://web.blogads.com/advertise/liberal_blog_advertising_network
Liberal Prose BlogAds Network
Memo reveals Alito's anti-choice strategy

It just gets worse and worse with this guy!

A recently released memo
written by Alito in 1985 shows that the Supreme Court nominee has been working to undermine choice for years.

The memo, written during Alito’s tenure in the Reagan administration, says that the Justice Department should aim to overturn Roe, and until then, should weaken the law through state restrictions.

Nancy Keenan, president of NARAL Pro-Choice America, said, “Alito’s memo is a litany of legal strategies designed to undermine women’s reproductive health. He even confuses birth control with abortion and advocates additional restrictions on women’s access to contraception.

Nice huh?

Of course, Alito's supporters say he was just doing his job:

"He was by no means suggesting the formulation of a policy here -- he was simply acknowledging and proceeding from a common premise from within the Justice Department" that Roe v. Wade was a flawed decision, said Chuck Cooper, a former assistant attorney general who worked with Alito in the Justice Department.

Wendy Long, chief counsel for the conservative Judicial Confirmation Network and an Alito supporter, said she believes Alito would be restrained as a jurist by a respect for legal precedent. Even if Alito personally opposes the legal reasoning or the impact of Roe v. Wade, he could still vote to uphold abortion rights, she said.

"The memo is more about inside baseball and tactics" rather than Alito's own views, she said.

Sure. That must be why he refers to doctors as "abortionists" and suggests telling women that "certain methods of birth control are 'abortifacients.'"

Posted by Jessica - December 01, 2005, at 11:16AM | in News , Politics , Reproductive Rights

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Memo reveals Alito's anti-choice strategy.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.feministing.com/cgi-bin/movabletype/mt-tb.fcgi/3020

2 Comments

[0+]  racya said:

The last thing we need is a man who dosn't know the difference between progesterone and an abortion to be in a position to rule on either.

He dosn't strike me as the type to pay proper heed to scientific inquiery and scientific fact. But then again scientific fact is so twentieth century these days.

"Inside baseball and tactics?" I thought he was a dispassionate judge who only tried to divine the meaning of the Constitution. The words "judicial activism" come to mind...

Leave a comment


Search Feministing
Related Posts
Related Community Posts
Upcoming Events
  • Baltimore - Roe at 36 Happy Hour
    Wednesday, 28 January 2009 06:00 PM to 08:00 PM
    Red Maple Restaurant and Lounge
    Baltimore, MD
  • Application Deadline for Midwest and Western Reproductive Justice Leadership Institutes
    Sunday, 1 February 2009 07:00 AM to 05:30 PM
    Ann Arbor, MI and Tucson, AZ
    , DC
  • Midwest Reproductive Justice Leadership Institute
    Sunday, 1 February 2009 11:00 PM to 01:00 AM
    Ann Arbor, MI and Tucson, AZ
    , AL
  • Feminism 2.0 Conference
    Monday, 2 February 2009 09:30 AM to 05:00 PM
    George Washington University, Betts Theater at the Marvin Center
    Washington, DC
  • You’re Invited to Talk About Choice!
    Monday, 2 February 2009 07:00 PM to 08:30 PM
    Durant Center
    Alexandria, VA

Recent Comments
Feministing As You Like It
Get involved with Feministing by joining our networks on:
Subscribe to Feministing
Weekly Feministing Newsletter