Yes, I'm very cranky today.

I'm blogging the hearings again today at BushvChoice, so go get the full story there. But if you're feeling lazy, just check out these tidbits from ConfirmThem (a blog organized by RedState.org). They're all gleeful and shit over Roberts’ answers on privacy. That should be enough to make you terrified:

Roberts’ answer was brilliant. He made a statement that will satisfy most Americans about privacy while leaving himself enough wiggle room to move the Court on that issue in the future.

A top-flight, leading conservative pro-life lawyer with a vibrant Supreme Court practice whose name most readers of this forum would know just walked into the room where I’m sitting. He was thrilled about Roberts’ answers during the dialogue with Specter and indicated his strong approval and endorsement. He explained that Roberts’s answer was carefully framed to provide a basis for revisiting and overturning Roe in the future. Specifically, he indicated that Roberts said that precedent could be overturned on the basis of changing circumstances.

Lovely.