Maria House is a homeless shelter for women and their children in my hometown of Dubuque, Iowa. The shelter takes less than 10 residents (and their kids) at a time, and is focused on transitional services to break the cycle of homelessness. It's not a faith-based organization.
The local paper reported yesterday that a production of The Vagina Monologues offered to donate 30% of their proceeds to Maria House, which refused the offer. Why, you ask?
"A couple of the scenes are not in our best interest to be associated with," said [Maria House director Michelle] Brown, who admits she has not seen the play. "We just feel it is better to be more prudent."
Don't all of their clients have vaginas? And a huge percentage of their residents are domestic violence victims. Seems like a perfect V-Day cause to me.
Given what I know about the organization, I'm assuming the real reason they rejected the money is that they just received a big chunk of funding from a local order of Catholic nuns. And the board membership (which includes my mother- more about that later) is generally very conservative. But really, what's so controversial about vaginas? (I mean, even the nuns have them...)
I know that hating on the Vagina Monolgues isn't exactly a new phenomenon, but this incident really hit home. Mainly because Maria House is one of the few causes my mother and I both wholeheartedly support. She's a conservative Catholic who doesn't believe in birth control, is against any sexual activity that's not between a married man and woman, and agrees with Pope Benedict's assessment that feminism is an "ideology of evil." Yeah, so we don't have much in common. And I'm sad that this has soured me on Maria House a little bit.
The paper's site is registration-required, so I posted the rest of the article below the jump.
Maria House declines play's proceeds
Producers offered to donate 30% to the women's shelter
By ERIK HOGSTROM
Maria House officials have rejected promised proceeds from a local performance of "The Vagina Monologues."
HogueMade Productions, of Galena, Ill., had planned to donate 30 percent of the proceeds from the Feb. 24-25 shows at the Dubuque Five Flags Center to the Maria House.
"We initially were grateful to be chosen and agreed to accept the proceeds," said Michelle Brown, the executive director of Maria House. "We did not really know how controversial this play was until we started getting more feedback."
The Maria House is a homeless shelter for women and children at 1561 Jackson St. in Dubuque.
Eve Ensler based her Obie Award-winning play on interviews with more than 200 women. The string of monologues portrays numerous women and their experiences, including sexual encounters and rape.
"A couple of the scenes are not in our best interest to be associated with," said Brown, who admits she has not see the play. "We just feel it is better to be more prudent."
"The Vagina Monologues" has inspired the creation of V-Day, a global movement to end violence against women and girls, and proceeds from the Dubuque shows will benefit the Riverview Center Inc. sexual assault prevention and intervention services.
"We are working with the production," said Josh Jasper, Riverview's executive director. "The show itself is basically raising awareness of violence against women and girls."
Jennifer Hogue, the producer and director of the local performances and one of the actresses, expressed disappointment with the Maria House decision.
"I support what they do," Hogue said. "I find it unfortunate that so many people are misled by the title of this show. It absolutely supports women."
Brown said her organization could have used proceeds from the play. About 92 percent of the Maria House budget comes from grants and donations.
"We feel that accepting funds from a production that includes a monologue portraying sexual exploitation would be contrary to the mission, vision and values of our organization," Brown said.
Hogue sought to allay such concerns.
"Once people in Dubuque come out and support this performance and see this performance, they will be empowered," she said.
Copyright 2006 Telegraph Herald
0 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: They don't want your dirty vagina money.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.feministing.com/cgi-bin/movabletype/mt-tb.fcgi/1526
Weekly Feministing Newsletter
Feministing RSS Feed
It's the lesbianism issue, more than likely. There is one scene involving a woman who had been seduced as a teenager by an older woman, and was unhappy about it at the time, but later in life thought she had gained some self-knowledge from the incident. Since this is less violent than most incidents described, and not the only incident involving a teen or child, I am concluding that it is the lesbian issue that makes this the highlighted objection for the organisations. This scene is the one cited by Focus on the Family and other right-wing patriarchal religious organisations as proving that the VagMon is an obscene and immoral play. (Amusing when the Catholic Church does the objecting...)
I know many find the vagina monalogues to be wonderful liberation up with cunt brew hahaha,
but i for one find it a bunch of trite nonsense, and that eve whats her name to be little more than a pompous female howard stern.
The absurdity would be seen if men were idiotic enough to have a "penis monalogues" If
there was any justice this "cock" shouting event would be laughted off stage... but, hey eve is rich now so great who gives a shit.
I am from Iowa too. I still live there, and this attitude doesn't surprise me.
I used to hate the VM, mostly because I'm not an emotional person and I don't like girlie stuff. Then I actually saw the play. I laughed my ass off! I am thoroughly convinced I would laugh my ass off at a Penis Monologues show, too.
So to all the VM haters, I say lighten up! It isn't worth your time hating something so harmless.
I've worked in non-profits for years, and I shake my head in wonder at someone being able to turn up their nose at money. I'm sure if you asked the women who reside there, they wouldn't care if the money came straight from a vagina. But horrors! How could we think of asking the people who actually benefit from the funds!
Ann posted: "Given what I know about the organization, I'm assuming the real reason they rejected the money is that they just received a big chunk of funding from a local order of Catholic nuns."
Oh, hey, which order of nuns? When I think Dubuque, I think the BVM's -- because their motherhouse is there -- and I see one is on the Maria House board. But the BVM's are generally a very progressive order, and I can't imagine that Sue Rink would object if she'd seen the text.
But I note that there are reps of several other orders on the Maria House board...maybe some also based in Dubuque, and you didn't mean the BVMs at all?...and...the way you phrased things leaves me a little confused. Did Brown say anything specific about this being her reason for backing off the funding? I went to a BVM all-women's college in Chicago, and I assure you, they were *very*very* progressive at the time, celebrating interfaith Seder / Easter services and teaching feminist texts in a mandatory "how to study" class given to all first-years. So... it makes me wonder what really happened here. :) Can you get your mom to tell you the inside story?